Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ilsa

(61,690 posts)
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 11:30 AM Jan 2012

My impression of Santorum on MTP, etc

Let me say first that I find Santorum's political positions revolting, and I think some of his personal beliefs are kooky, but he is entitled to them.

After seeing the goofballs on the GOP debates not understand some very basic current topics, after seeing the morally ambiguous Newt, Cain, and Romney lie about their personal and professional behavior, Santorum looks sane and intelligent after a cursory look. He looks like a cross between Tom Hanks and Chevy Chase, and is a good speaker. It doesn't surprise me that the Santorum is (gag) surging. He has a charisma that Newt and others lack. We need to watch out for this guy.

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
My impression of Santorum on MTP, etc (Original Post) Ilsa Jan 2012 OP
Man on dog ain't going anywhere madokie Jan 2012 #1
I agree, Santorum has no chance. The money players want Mitt. sarcasmo Jan 2012 #2
You may be right: the GOP primary Ilsa Jan 2012 #8
The money boys do want Mitt customerserviceguy Jan 2012 #20
Where did that term come from? MoonRiver Jan 2012 #9
It stems from a quote Santorum made to an AP reporter riderinthestorm Jan 2012 #13
OMG, what an idiot! MoonRiver Jan 2012 #22
He always strikes me Mz Pip Jan 2012 #3
That's the thing: he's not acting petulant Ilsa Jan 2012 #6
To be honest, I was impressed by his performance with Ed Schultz at the campaign event. Santorum is Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2012 #14
The people of his own state voted overwhelmingly to oust him from office. Bandit Jan 2012 #15
Yes, but then that same state (my own PA) voted in Sen Toomey Marie Marie Jan 2012 #27
I don't see it, deucemagnet Jan 2012 #4
Sun light is the best disinfectant bahrbearian Jan 2012 #5
We can only hope that the Ilsa Jan 2012 #7
That will require eye bleach. GoneOffShore Jan 2012 #21
I see what you are saying etherealtruth Jan 2012 #10
Santorum lacks appeal. MineralMan Jan 2012 #11
I don't give a shit about Santorum as long as he does better than expected. I want ANYONE but Mitt Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2012 #12
To paraphrase my wife's brilliant insight, we need only look at how coalition_unwilling Jan 2012 #16
Yes!! See how quickly Americans forget how cruel and offensive this man is... Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2012 #18
To paraphrase your paraphrase: rustydog Jan 2012 #23
When I saw him at the latest debate, he seemed awfully full of himself, lacking coalition_unwilling Jan 2012 #17
I agree customerserviceguy Jan 2012 #19
The tea partiers called themselves "teabaggers" -- it wasn't our idea starroute Jan 2012 #25
Yes, that's how the name started customerserviceguy Jan 2012 #26
He's the perfect choice for the GOP. They should nominate him. n/t deacon Jan 2012 #24

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
20. The money boys do want Mitt
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 01:16 PM
Jan 2012

but that's only because Santorum has been at 2-3 percent in the polls until just this last week. Is there any doubt that they'd get what they want from a President Santorum? He'd unite the tea partiers and especially the fundies to the ticket in a way that Mittens never could.

If Romney gets the nomination, they'll have to spend a LOT of super-PAC money on, "Mormons are normal people just like the rest of us" ads. They'd much rather spend it on ads attacking President Obama. My prediction is that if Santorum can do well in Iowa and New Hampshire, then win South Carolina and Florida, the money players will gladly shift their wagers over to him.

They want to win more than anything else, Shrub proved that they don't care which idiot it is with, they can all be manipulated.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
9. Where did that term come from?
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 12:32 PM
Jan 2012

I've heard it for years, but can't recall, maybe never knew, what it referred to.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
13. It stems from a quote Santorum made to an AP reporter
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 12:44 PM
Jan 2012

Lara Jakes Jordan in response to the Catholic Church sex abuse scandal

"In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That's not to pick on homosexuality. It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be. It is one thing. And when you destroy that you have a dramatic impact on the quality —" (At this point, Jordan commented, "I'm sorry, I didn't think I was going to talk about 'man on dog' with a United States senator, it's sort of freaking me out," coining a phrase widely used in connection with this incident.)[7

Mz Pip

(27,434 posts)
3. He always strikes me
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 11:50 AM
Jan 2012

as being a petulant, dogmatic and self-righteous little prick. The evangelicals love him because he's just like them - petulant, dogmatic, self-righteous little pricks.

Ilsa

(61,690 posts)
6. That's the thing: he's not acting petulant
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 12:26 PM
Jan 2012

In front of the cameras anymore. He's trying to sound patient and reasonable. He all but said, "I'm a uniter, not a divider," on MTP this morning. For example, he explains his votes on some conservative issues as the first step in getting what they want.

He's getting better campaign help from someone.

GOP voters have short memories. They aren't going to remember his crybaby episodes from previous elections.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
14. To be honest, I was impressed by his performance with Ed Schultz at the campaign event. Santorum is
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 12:45 PM
Jan 2012

usually brash and arrogant. Not so much so at this event and in interviews.

I hope he wins Iowa, just to spite Mitt Romney. It's anyone but Mitt for me!

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
15. The people of his own state voted overwhelmingly to oust him from office.
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 12:46 PM
Jan 2012

His own state doesn't like him..

Marie Marie

(9,999 posts)
27. Yes, but then that same state (my own PA) voted in Sen Toomey
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 11:59 PM
Jan 2012

who is far to the right of even Santorum. I am so ashamed (for ever giving either of these two a position in congress)and my apologies to the Nation.

deucemagnet

(4,549 posts)
4. I don't see it,
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 11:55 AM
Jan 2012

but Republicans are running out of options. Every time they move the spotlight to another candidate, they react with a shudder. Now it's Santorum's turn. Maybe this will work to his advantage, because he doesn't have to be good, just the least repulsive.

Ilsa

(61,690 posts)
7. We can only hope that the
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 12:28 PM
Jan 2012

Spotlight will reveal his weaknesses and goofiness. Let's hope the stress gets to him.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
10. I see what you are saying
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 12:34 PM
Jan 2012

With a cursory glance (sadly much of the american populace only gives a cursory glance) ... he doesn't appear to be an imbecile (Palin, Bachman, Perry) .... he doesn't have the well publicized lack of ethics/ decency as Gingrich and Cain.

One doesn't have to dig deep to find his crazy ...but, one has to wonder how lang he can conceal it ... ?

I'm not worried about the guy; I am not sure Republican insiders support him ... but after the Bush presidency I rule nothing out.

MineralMan

(146,281 posts)
11. Santorum lacks appeal.
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 12:41 PM
Jan 2012

Call it a lack of charisma or a lack of "gravitas" (a word I detest), but the bottom line is that he is boring. He has not a prayer of being a Presidential candidate for the GOP. He's just a distraction.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
12. I don't give a shit about Santorum as long as he does better than expected. I want ANYONE but Mitt
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 12:43 PM
Jan 2012

Romney to win Iowa because I believe that if Mitt were to pull this out, the momentum is with him. So I say, go Santorum! Go Ron Paul! Go Newt Gingrich!

I do not want Romney to win. He's an arrogant asshole, piece of shit, already announcing that he is going to win. Asshole!

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
16. To paraphrase my wife's brilliant insight, we need only look at how
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 12:49 PM
Jan 2012

Romney treated his dog to know how he would treat us:

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1638065,00.html

This message brought to you by the K-99%

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
18. Yes!! See how quickly Americans forget how cruel and offensive this man is...
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 12:55 PM
Jan 2012

...and his cocky-ass sons who can't go to Iraq because they have to help their daddy get elected!!

rustydog

(9,186 posts)
23. To paraphrase your paraphrase:
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 02:33 PM
Jan 2012

Mitt (Willard) Romney strapped company workers jobs to the rooftop of the company truck he bought and drove the jobs to china. (Man he loved hat job.)

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
17. When I saw him at the latest debate, he seemed awfully full of himself, lacking
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 12:51 PM
Jan 2012

any sense of humility.

Maybe that's a requirement to become POTUS. But I think that inflated sense of self-worth might be Santorum's Achilles heel and one that a clever Obama team ought to be able to exploit, the way Lloyd Bentsen famously served Dan Quayle so many years ago.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
19. I agree
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 01:12 PM
Jan 2012

He managed to handle himself quite well today. I really expected a stumble or gaffe of some kind, and he didn't do it. He managed to steer the conversation over to his 'successes', in other words, make it all about him.

I think a lot of fundies are going to go home after church today, they've heard the buzz at the coffee hour after the service, and will actually watch that videotape of MTP, and be impressed. If any of them do Google up his name, they will be shocked, and will rally to him even more. Did calling tea partiers 'teabaggers' shame any of them out of those beliefs?

starroute

(12,977 posts)
25. The tea partiers called themselves "teabaggers" -- it wasn't our idea
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 03:16 PM
Jan 2012

Once everyone found out what it meant, they were mocked for it. But until then they'd been wearing teabags on their hats, selling miniature silver teabags at their rallies, and everything else imaginable.

And Santorum's weaknesses aren't a matter of people making fun of his name. They have to do with things like the way he was cheating the state of Pennsylvania out of expensive online tuition for his children while having no official residence in the state except a small cottage that he was renting out to someone else.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
26. Yes, that's how the name started
Sun Jan 1, 2012, 04:16 PM
Jan 2012

but we really ran with it. I don't think it did anything other than cause them to distance themselves from progressives who might have made common cause with them on issues like prosecuting banksters.

It remains to be seen if the tea partiers will sour on Santorum for the cyberschooling his kids got, my guess is that it pales in comparison to the millions Newt's taken from Freddie Mac. All Santorum needs to do is reimburse the school district, and he'll probably get a pass. Newt's Stepford wife was never going to let him pay back the Freddie Mac money, it buys way too much Tiffany for that.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My impression of Santorum...