General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEssentia Health fires 69 employees over refusal to get flu shots
http://www.fox9.com/news/essentia-health-fires-69-employees-over-refusal-to-get-flu-shots"KMSP) - Essentia Health announced it has fired 69 employees who refused to get a flu shot.
According to the Duluth-based health system, of their 13,900 employees, 99.5 percent of them complied and got the flu shot, leaving 69 employees who did not get the flu shot. The deadline to get the shot was Monday.
If they didn't get the shot by that deadline, their employment was terminated. "
If you are going to be an anti-vax idiot, why would you get a job in a hospital?
mcar
(42,298 posts)Hard to disagree. Why keep on healthcare workers who risk the health of their patients?
ileus
(15,396 posts)We were required to have it by 10/31 at our hospital.
brooklynite
(94,489 posts)Calculating
(2,955 posts)Can't have anti-vax idiots working in a hospital and spreading disease.
still_one
(92,116 posts)RobinA
(9,888 posts)does not make one anti-vax, it just makes one anti-flu shot
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)That would be like me being anti respirator even though I work on Superfund sites.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)I'd still do it, but it's a bit terrifying.
Retrograde
(10,132 posts)The nurse giving the shot yesterday was quick: I felt the alcohol swap, then that was about it. I found that looking away and talking helps.
gristy
(10,667 posts)And I'm a diabetic!
brush
(53,764 posts)quick and painless.
I didn't get one last year and got a horrible case of the flu, it lasted 3 weeks
This year I said, never again.
Ilsa
(61,692 posts)But it can be less effective, I've heard. Plus, you are getting an attenuated virus, so you might feel achy or even feverish.
I hate getting shots, but I hate having respiratory diseases more.
moriah
(8,311 posts)Either the effectiveness of the method is becoming problematic or this year's batch sucked, but here's what they've got on their page:
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/qa/flushot.htm
Sorry, needlephobes...
Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)it is a live virus and can cause shedding of the virus which can harm patients as well.
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)hatrack
(59,583 posts).
Doreen
(11,686 posts)I will get them every year now.
TomSlick
(11,096 posts)If you work in a hospital, nursing home, etc. you must have your flu shot. People's lives depend on it.
A nurse with a needle phobia or religious scruples against vaccinations? You're kidding right?
bluestarone
(16,900 posts)this is wrong. if they can force them they can force ALL!! Give me a break this is not democratic thinking here. force a person to do something JUST ISN'T RIGHT
brush
(53,764 posts)flu from them.
The requirement is just common sense.
bluestarone
(16,900 posts)brush
(53,764 posts)to patients and other there?
bluestarone
(16,900 posts)some have major reaction to it they cannot with 100% confidence deny this
brush
(53,764 posts)a hospital.
You can't possibly think that's a good idea.
The flu can kill people.
bluestarone
(16,900 posts)AFTER the flu shot if they are the one to have this reaction????
BoneyardDem
(1,202 posts)with the vast majority having had shots prior to employment as part of their required pre employment education. They already know if there exists any allergic reactions prior to being hired. Have you even contemplated looking up the allergic reaction rate of those health care providers getting the flu shot?
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)these are folks that either didn't ask for one or didn't get one
bluestarone
(16,900 posts)you don't know if you would be the one to get a bad reaction to it until it's too late? THEN WHAT?
KT2000
(20,572 posts)knows in advance that getting a flu shot is a requirement. For those who do not want to take the risk they would have to find a different type of employment.
Flu shots are required for those in medical programs at the local college because they are in contact with patients. It's about the patients.
People are free to not get the shot, just not work in the medical field if they don't want it.
How about this - you are scheduled for surgery and check in to the hospital. The admitting clerk is coming down with the flu and he/she goes home after checking you in. You have your surgery and then after, while you are recovering, you come down with the flu. There could be serious complications for you.
Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)so I expect the ones that dropped dead from it didn't make it out of nursing/radiography/respiratory therapy school.
So it is reasonable to assume that everyone has been exposed to the shot at least once.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)you're just blabbing.
WHY ARE YOU TALKING ON THIS SUBJECT?
if you want to challenge experts BRING EXPERTISE!
you're just blabbing.
bluestarone
(16,900 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)let's answer that question first.
also, 105 out of how many and how soon? and congratulations on your googling. how many posts in this thread devoid of any knowledge did you post before even providing one link?
This myth is most common with the flu vaccine. Doctors often hear, I got the flu shot and I got sick, says Pedro Piedra, a professor of molecular virology and microbiology and of pediatrics at the Baylor College of Medicine.
The flu shot cant cause the flu, though, and getting sick soon after receiving a flu shot is probably a coincidence, he says. Most influenza vaccines are delivered in the fall and early winter. Thats when we have the highest rate of respiratory viruses circulating and causing mischief, Piedra notes.
The shot may spark some mild and temporary flulike symptoms, a sign, says Swanson, that the vaccine is effectively building immunity.
None of the other vaccines approved by the Food and Drug Administration can cause the illnesses they protect against, either. But they can have temporary side effects, such as a mild fever or swelling at the injection site.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/4-common-myths-about-vaccines/2017/11/17/422093b4-b42b-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html?utm_term=.c0244bc2dc7a
bluestarone
(16,900 posts)NOTHING is as safe as they make it out to be or do you trust everything they tell you? and then it's there way or the hi-way Sounds like more how the Repubs think
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)and based on that WHO should we trust more on this topic YOU? or SCIENCE?
if everyone here trusted science MORE than the kind of ignorance you're peddling, we'd all be a hell of a lot safer.
bluestarone
(16,900 posts)pushing anything here except my right to think. and seems like that bothers quit a bit.This is a dicussion forum and SCIENCE like YOU say CANNOT guarantee 100% no reaction! from the flu shot
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)than if you accepted all the valid studies? (primary sources, not secondary by the way)
if you think that makes you smarter or more informed, you don't know what you're talking about.
but you pretty much established that from the start.
by the way, do you go to doctors?
WHY?
YOU'RE TOO SMART FOR THAT. We're the sheeple going to the doctors, getting vaccinated, accepting scientific conclusions MORE than cranky crackpots using 1% of that science and 99% of their own head stories to say their ideas are better.
But we're the dumb ones.
You have fun now.
bluestarone
(16,900 posts)but the problem i have is people being forced or lose there job! I realize they can quit but after 20=30 years hard to do that
ProfessorGAC
(64,988 posts)A scientist here! Forcing me? You have a point! Forcing a health care provider? You don't!
And you "reaction" argument? Consider it an occupational risk.
brush
(53,764 posts)person refusing to take a flu shot.
Doodley
(9,078 posts)womanofthehills
(8,690 posts)Why Are Cases of Shoulder Injuries From Vaccines Increasing?
Last year when I posted info on SERVA, some DU'ers said they might have it.
Doctors now have a name for Cassayres condition: shoulder injury related to vaccine administration, or SIRVA, caused by a vaccine injected too high up on the arm. The prolonged pain and stiffness of SIRVA is distinctin other words, much worsethan typical soreness from shots.
While very rare and still little-known, SIRVA cases settled in the governments so-called vaccine injury court have shot up in recent years. Under US law, all vaccine injury cases come before the Office of Special Masters of the US Court of Federal Claims, rather than the usual state or federal courts. Since 2011, the court has ruled to compensate 112 patients for SIRVA, with more than half those cases in the past year, according to an analysis in the Wall Street Journal.
A month ago, the government proposed an obscure rule change that has big implications for SIRVA. SIRVA would be added to the Vaccine Injury Table, a list of known vaccine complications for which getting compensation is easier and faster. The addition of SIRVAafter years of reviewis confirmation that the scientific evidence is valid and the suffering of victims is real.
https://www.wired.com/2015/09/cases-shoulder-injuries-vaccines-increasing/
Doodley
(9,078 posts)vaccinations for many decades.
Response to bluestarone (Reply #51)
Post removed
procon
(15,805 posts)Check your source, the owner is a charlatan who promotes 'quack treatments', he has no background in medicine or science, he's just a conman peddling snake oil and magic pills based on his crackpot pseudoscience and crazy anti-vax conspiracies.
Revanchist
(1,375 posts)And we all know how reliable he is!
Response to CreekDog (Reply #42)
Post removed
kcr
(15,315 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)... their patients.
Almost all state nursing boards have regulations about immunizations. A nurse practitioner I know who had measles as a child still didn't test out with high enough of an antibody titer and had to have a total of three doses of measles vaccine before her titers showed her officially immune.
And given that we've had measles outbreaks here because of churches that have a lot of homeschool anti-vaccine people having people come back from mission trips with it and spread it among the non-immune.... she's glad they didn't just go by her childhood history as she could have ended up with it as a 55 year old woman.
For influenza, the only obstacle that really can't be overcome is a prior history of Gullian-Barre Syndrome. There are recombinant vaccines that are vegan, and the CDC has a flowchart about how to handle varying degrees of egg allergies if the only shots available *are* egg-based...
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/vaccine/egg-allergies.htm
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)and find a job that doesn't involve posing a risk to hospital patients.
Your seemingly major crisis solved.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)Problem solved.
womanofthehills
(8,690 posts)A VERY VERY small percentage of people have a bad reaction to the flu shot. If you have a severe reaction, there is a Dept of Health Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Some hospitals will let nurses opt out of the flu shot if they wear a mask.
https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/index.html
For the vast number of vaccines that are given, only a tiny percentage of people are injured & compensated. Here is the compensation chart posted by the government Vaccine-Injury Compensation Program. However, the number is getting higher each year and one would hope it would be going in the other direction. In 2017, the program paid out $282,010,851.21 in award money according to their below report.
>
https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hrsa/vaccine-compensation/VICPmonthlyreportNov2017.pdf
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)Plus your own link says the side effect from influenza shots is severe allergic reaction. Thats easily dealt with beforehand, especially if the shot is administered in the hospital.
Some of the childhood vaccines have been linked to genetic diseases, and accusations have been made about the flu shot and GBS, but nothing conclusive.
If one is unable to safely perform ones job duties, perhaps one should not be doing that job. Theres a reason narcoleptics and epileptics usually cant get CDLs. Its dangerous to other people.
womanofthehills
(8,690 posts)the childhood vaccines have been around so long they have been perfected while the flu shots are made up new each year and there are only a few months to test them.
If you look at the websites of the hundred or so law firms that the government has ok'ed to work with the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, here is the list of vaccine injuries most of them have on their sites. These are the specific injuries that the government will cover. i don't think I can post individual law firm sites because that might be prohibited on here. I know Guillain-Barre Syndrome is only about 2% of all the shots given according to the gov site.
Vaccine Injury Coverage Includes:
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Transverse Myelitis
Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM)
Anaphylaxis
Anaphylactic Shock
Encephalopathy
Brachial Neuritis
Chronic Arthritis
Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
Paralysis
Intussusception
SIRVA
Shoulder Injuries
and More
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)Because I am, naturally and as always completely correct
My wife, however, says that Im always jaded and cynical, especially to everyone involved in a medical malpractice lawsuit. More specifically, Ive been informed that I am just exceptionally bitter and cranky tonight. Shes always right: thats simultaneously the best and worst thing about marrying someone smarter than you.
I just keep looking at the news and thinking about how stupid people are trying to elect a pedophile so that he can help billionaires steal working peoples money, and even if you show proof of all of it they say we have alternative facts. Then I think about that psycho just down the street from me who decided to shoot 600 people with a machine gun, the panicked phone calls from friends and family who work in adjacent buildings, the calls from friends soaked in other peoples blood. Incindiary ammunition aimed at the jet fuel tanks.
Hundreds of lives taken or wrecked. I know people who just went inside their house after the first round of funerals, waited a week, and then made their families hurt twice as bad because they couldnt live with the survivors guilt. More than a thousand people killed in America since then and no ones done shit. The gun nuts are so good at repeating the script the NRA has spent forty years perfecting, so good that they muddy up the issue just enough to make even small, sensible gun safety reforms impossible.
So I get depressed and wrapped up and anxious and soon Im arguing with strangers about the proper way to apply a cost/problem analysis to the solution of things like influenza vaccines and gun violence.
Tl;dr. Im in a weird mental space tonight. Very funky, but not P-Funk funky. Furious and helpless there's nothing I can do.
So: sorry i wasted your time.
womanofthehills
(8,690 posts)If you like to argue, DU is your place . I get where you are coming from. I live outside of a small rural town and the hostility of the conservatives towards the liberals is growing like nothing I have even seen.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)out.
liberalhistorian
(20,815 posts)they are putting a lot of people in danger EVERY single day that they are on duty, ALL day. The flu is actually pretty dangerous for children, the elderly, the sick and those with compromised/weakened immune systems. Which is pretty much most patients. Even healthy people can die or have serious complications from the flu; I was one of them a few years ago. We tend to ascribe the word "flu" to any kind of sickness we feel or have, but that's completely inaccurate.
It is the height of selfishness for a medical worker to do this. There are times when the good of community MUST come before individuals, and this is one of them. Our extreme individualism has gone too far and is killing us.
Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)you have a choice of taking the shot or finding a new job.
womanofthehills
(8,690 posts)Many hospitals have religious and medical exemptions.
Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)It is very difficult to wear a mask all day.
Pretty much the only options at our facility is a documented medical reason or a documented religious reason.
Leith
(7,808 posts)First of all, this is an employer, not the US government. A truck driver is required to have the correct license classification to have the job, for example. Would you consider it against a job applicant's rights to be fired for not keeping his or her license up to date? How about a pharmacist who refuses to dispense birth control or morning after pills to someone with a prescription?
Second, do you think it's a good idea for a hospital employee who has come down with the flu but is not yet showing symptoms (meaning: contagious) to tend to a patient who is fresh out of surgery? I sure as hell don't. One of the leading causes of death is infections that the victim got from being in the hospital.
The least that a civilized society can expect is for health care workers to keep themselves as healthy as possible - THAT IS JUST AND RIGHT.
bluestarone
(16,900 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,324 posts)I'm going to tell my employer they can't "force me" to come to work.
Nobody is being held down and made to endure a small needle jab.
There are requirements for many jobs, whether it's an advanced degree, ability to communicate, background check, certification, license, to name just a few.
This is nothing more than a requirement of being a health care worker. It is most likely in the contract: prevention against communicable diseases. And it's just good sense.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)They still haven't had the vaccine, so they weren't forced to get it, by definition.
Skittles
(153,141 posts)perhaps they should work in those fields
BoneyardDem
(1,202 posts)Your employers can force you to produce verification of claims you have made on a resume, for certain certifications and education. You might have to prove you can type 55WPM, you might have to prove that you are actually a State certified counselor. You might have to provide a valid social security card, CDL license, EMT certificate. Don't like the rules the employers established PRIOR to hire? Then move on. There is nothing outrageous or over the top in requiring a health care provider not be a source for illness, and sickness to a vunerable patient base.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)It's a condition of employment, just like coming to work on time, or calling your supervisor when you're taking a sick day.
Staph
(6,251 posts)I'm a cancer survivor, currently undergoing chemo. I can't have a flu shot. I depend on the herd immunity of all of you other kind folks who get your shots regularly.
MurrayDelph
(5,293 posts)but I am allergic to something in the flu shots (I became violently ill every time I was given one), so I am appreciative of those that get the shot, so I can also piggyback on the herd immunity.
(For the record, I am up-to-date on all my other vaccinations; it's only flu shots I have to avoid).
TexasBushwhacker
(20,165 posts)to health workers (or anyone) who has the flu. They put anyone with a compromised immune system at risk.
lame54
(35,282 posts)Are not the same thing
I don't get flu shots yet i am fully vaccinated
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Just to a family of viruses that never stop evolving.
Your choice not to get one unless you want to work in a hospital. In which case not getting on will result in termination
lame54
(35,282 posts)The shots i got as a kid have prevented me from getting those specific diseases
Each year people get flu shots and still get flu
Each year people pass and don't get the flu
The consistency is not the same
Childhood vaccinations are a must
Flu shots - not so much
Not getting a flu shot does not make one an anti-vaxxer
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)But saying stuff like you did does make one an anti-vaxxer.
But you think saying it about just one vaccine makes you special and informed.
Nah.
womanofthehills
(8,690 posts)When researchers followed 328 households during the 2010-2011 flu season, they found much to their surprise that the only people who really seemed to benefit from immunization were the ones who hadn't gotten a flu shot the year before. These "unexpected findings ... require further study," the researchers wrote, in 2013.
A larger and more robust study, published last year in Clinical Infectious Diseases, added more evidence that the 2013 study was onto something important. Researchers followed more than 7,000 people for eight yearly flu seasons, and they learned people got the strongest protection against the flu only when they were vaccinated for the current season and at no other time during the previous five years.
Considering that some vaccines require multiple doses to be effective, as Branswell notes, "the fact that repeated vaccination against flu might diminish rather than enhance the vaccine's protection is perplexing." But it's possible that "antibodies produced in year one may neutralize some of the vaccine in year two's shot before it can trigger a full immune response," she writes.
http://www.businessinsider.com/annual-flu-shots-may-lower-effectiveness-2015-11
Mariana
(14,854 posts)No vaccine is 100% effective.
Laffy Kat
(16,376 posts)That's the deal about the influenza vaccine. You may still get sick but you won't get as sick. It the difference of a few days of feeling achy and tired versus pneumonia.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)I'm trying to argue with the foolish implication that a vaccine that doesn't prevent 100% of recipients from contracting the disease isn't worth getting.
When an unvaccinated person brought measles to my town, I got sick, and so did one of my classmates (also vaccinated). Then herd immunity came into play, the virus had nowhere else to go, and our little epidemic ended with us two. That's a fantastic result, even though I had to be one of the exceptions that proves the rule that the vaccine works very well indeed.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)Therefore there are different shots, targeted at the viruses predicted to be active the next year. Sometimes the prediction is off and a different strain becomes the one that breaks out.
Mumps is mumps. Rubella is Rubella. Influenza A has around 144 different strains.
Now do you understand why the consistency is not the same?
All flu shots ARE vaccines. Being against them makes one against vaccines. Maybe there should be a term for those who only object to the flu vaccines, but in general, a lack of knowledge is what lumps them together with the people that object to all vaccines
Regardless of your thought process on flu shots, getting one is a requirement for working in a hospital setting. There are terms when you agree to do a job. If you are averse to the terms, you do not take the job. If you violate the terms, you lose your job, It's that simple.
Beakybird
(3,332 posts)And then I got the Egyptian flu from my mummy.
MarvinGardens
(779 posts)But I agree, no exceptions for just being anti-vax.
Tess49
(1,579 posts)had medical or religious reasons for not taking it. That's several months of wearing a mask. No thanks. I always took the shot.
womanofthehills
(8,690 posts)for medical or religious reasons.
Aristus
(66,310 posts)Get your vaccines or get out...
madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)better.
Sentath
(2,243 posts)And likely should avoid public facing positions.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Then yes, its better to be a little authoritarian sometimes. Medicine isn't an arena where personal choice and personal fads are ok. If people don't get their kids vaccinated, there's a chance that choice could condemn another child or vulnerable adult to an agonizing death or lifelong disability. With the flu jab, avoiding it could ensure an old person catches the illness that otherwise wouldn't and ends up dying.
This stuff isn't a game, real lives are at risk.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)I certainly dont.
But lots seem to enjoy ordering people about -what words we can or cannot use, what subjects we should be posting about, how we should feel about stories in the news, etc. and on and on.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)On an issue where a bad choice could literally lead to the deaths of others, it hardly seems unreasonable for people to do the latter.
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)daughter to not have the right to put the health of sick people in the hospital with compromised immune systems at risk...sometimes you need to get a different job.
Aristus
(66,310 posts)them are perfectly appropriate.
If someone is just an anti-vaxxer, I kick 'em out. Deliberately making oneself a vector for disease transmission is unconscionable.
womanofthehills
(8,690 posts)Aristus
(66,310 posts)If payouts for lawsuits grow large enough, they'll change their tune.
Anyway, I can't control what hospitals do. I can control what goes on in my clinic. I already had two patients today refuse the flu vaccine for reasons other than allergy or they already had it. I told them they would probably feel happier and more comfortable with another primary care provider. They changed their tune pretty quickly. My patients are among the most vulnerable in our society. I'm not going to allow someone to expose them to a preventable disease if I can help it.
egduj
(805 posts)madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)Leith
(7,808 posts)If not, they are not part of the issue.
If they are, they have a good excuse.
moriah
(8,311 posts)Called Flublok.
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/vaccine/qa_flublok-vaccine.htm
Doesn't have a long shelf life so it's unlikely to be using harmful preservatives either.
womanofthehills
(8,690 posts)flu virus either. So are they basically hinting that these are the ingredients of the other flu vaccines on the market. So instead of eggs, it looks like we have worms.
Pretty fascinating (science marches on) -
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/01/18/169695011/a-worms-ovary-cells-become-a-flu-vaccine-machine
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)what i don't get is why they think they are convincing in any way.
(referring to a few comments in the thread that... :eyes )
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,841 posts)I'm 69 years old and in excellent health, and more to the point, I got the flu a bunch of times in my childhood. So I'm pretty confident in my immunity. I'm sure it's at least as good as the variable and uncertain immunity of the flu shot.
About 8 years ago during a particularly hysterical "EVERYONE MUST GET THE FLU SHOT IMMEDIATELY!!" outbreaks, I was working in a hospital. I politely declined the flu shot pointing out that I was in the category of people who needed to be last on the list (I was over 60), since the vaccine supply was limited.
Periodically here on DU during these annual EVERYONE MUST GET THE FLU SHOT diatribes, I get accused of being a non-symptomatic carrier of flu. Ummm, that's simply not a thing. There is simply no evidence at all of non-symptomatic carriers of flu. Luckily for everyone's peace of mind, I am no longer in the workforce at all.
Oh, and my job at the hospital did not involve direct patient contact.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)The fact that you think that nonsense means your opinion is nonsense and ignorant.
Oh and just because it's very convincing in your head doesn't mean it's based on facts. It just means you convinced yourself that your own thoughts are true.
Imagine that, you had a thought and you BRAVELY came to the conclusion that YOU WERE RIGHT! GROUNDBREAKING! GENIUS.
Without any knowledge or science involved.
womanofthehills
(8,690 posts)The first influenza attack that a child suffers can affect the way that their lifelong immunity to the virus builds up. A wide range of influenza A virus subtypes infect humans. Subtype H5 belongs to HA group 1 (which also includes H1 and H2 subtypes), and subtype H7 belongs to HA group 2 (which also includes the H3 subtype). Gostic et al. found that birth-year cohorts that experienced first infections with seasonal H3 subtype viruses were less susceptible to the potentially fatal avian influenza H7N9 virus (see the Perspective by Viboud and Epstein). Conversely, older individuals who were exposed to H1 or H2 subtype viruses as youngsters were less susceptible to avian H5N1-bearing viruses. A mathematical model of the protective effect of this imprinting could potentially prove useful to predict the age distribution and severity of future pandemics.
Science, this issue p. 722; see also p. 706
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6313/722
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)I was a very sickly kid, and young adult. Mom used to say that every February I was going to get sick. True. Since we are both the same age, you too probably got the flu as a kid during the 1957 Pandemic. Did you get the flu during the 2009 Pandemic? I was working at an Elementary School then, which starting looking more like a Senior Center than a school. Kids were out sick. The younger teachers were out sick, but those of us over 50 weren't. Why? We had lived through that 1957 Pandemic and got immunity from that. Other posters can look that up. The CDC has admitted it. Mutates? Apparently not enough from 1957 to 2009. Immunity, not asymptomatic carriers.
I just don't catch the flu from people around me with. One February I came up from Florida to see my Daughter and Grandson. They all had the flu. My Grandson got his flu shot, still got it, and gave it to his parents. Ran myself ragged taking care of all of them. Never caught it myself. Was I the asymptomatic carrier to them? From 1,000 miles away? Geesch. My husband got the flu last June which went into pneumonia, despite getting both a flu shot and two pneumonia shots. To quote his doctor, "They don't always work". Did I give him pneumonia too?
Office Workers at Hospitals were fired also. Don't become a Health Care Worker? Patients themselves can refuse flu shot, or any other vaccines, but Office Workers can't?
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,841 posts)I think I got the flu several times thereafter, but probably not in at least 50 years. I was likewise somewhat sickly as a child. The third of six children, and until I was seven we lived in a housing project for low income people. Lots of other kids. Back then I of course got measles, mumps, rubella, and probably chicken pox. I say probably to that last one because my mom told me that I was just a baby, less than a year old when my sister, only 18 months older, got it. She said the sister got the worst case she'd ever seen, though that perhaps that's what smallpox might have looked like. Sister had scars well into adulthood. Anyway, mom took me off to the family doctor and I was given a shot of gamma globulin, a relatively common thing back then, as an immune system booster. Apparently I got the symptoms but never broke out with the poxes.
It was the 2009 pandemic that the hospital was wanting employees to get the shot or sign a waiver, and as I recall people above some age were specifically requested by the CDC not to get the shot, so long as they were otherwise in good health, as the vaccine was in short supply.
What is largely understood by most people is that in the 1918 flu epidemic, the reason that older adults very rarely got it, was because some fifty years earlier there had been a flu epidemic of the same kind of flu, and so they were almost to a person immune.
Another thing that isn't taken into consideration is that today the single best public health measure is vastly more common than it was a hundred years ago. Handwashing. With soap. A hundred years ago a lot of people didn't even have running water in their homes. Handwashing was less commonly practiced.
The up side of your family all getting the flu earlier this year is that now they've got a stronger immunity to future flu events.
The John Berry book The Great Influenza is one I cannot recommend strongly enough. It's about the 1918 epidemic and includes good information on the state of medicine in this country at that time. The one thing people should know about that epidemic was that our government, against the direct and specific advice of medical experts, kept on putting young men drafted as soldiers into overcrowded camps with primitive sanitation facilities, and then loaded them onto overcrowded boats to go off to fight The Great War. THAT'S how and why that epidemic spread so far and became so deadly.
Laffy Kat
(16,376 posts)They HIGHLY recommend flu shots but there is an out if you don't want to: you have to sign a refusal and wear a mask while treating all patients. Some employees chose to do that.
secondwind
(16,903 posts)secondwind
(16,903 posts)Vinca
(50,255 posts)If you're anti-vax you should be in another profession that doesn't include human contact.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Who are their patients? Their computers? Tell me what occupation doesn't include human contact of some sort. Even people who work in a office environment have contact with other office workers.
Vinca
(50,255 posts)Do billing clerks use the hospital cafeteria? Do they occasionally walk the halls going to and from their offices? I used to be an anti-flu vaccine person, too. Then I got it and was so ill and had such a high temperature I started to worry about dying . . . when I was lucid. And I was a healthy person at the time. Imagine how a flu outbreak would affect a hospital full of sick people.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Do they walk the halls? Sit in lobbies and waiting rooms? There are far more visitors in hospitals and nursing homes than employees. Would you demand every visitor show proof of their flu shot? Sorry, you cannot visit your loved one in the hospital unless you can prove you have had your flu shot? Does that apply to ER AND Intensive Care Family Members? Sorry you cannot see your Loved One who has had a Heart Attack unless you show your flu shot vaccination record? Deny that and hospitals will have major law suits; employees nothing in comparison.
My elderly, retired husband gets his flu shot every year. One year he was given a card which said this is your PROOF of your vaccination. Carry it on your PERSON at all times. His reaction? Be happy I even got a vaccination. Don't ask me to carry around proof of it for the "Flu Police". The card went into the trash. Is this the kind of society you want?
My husband is a Republican. I am a Democrat. He gets all his Senior vaccinations. I don't. Yet we both agree that this should be a matter of personal choice. Neither of us has the right to force this on each other as a married couple. Imagine that? Something both Republicans and Democrats agree on. lol
Vinca
(50,255 posts)I only hope you and others would be considerate of your fellow human beings. Most don't want your germs and Mother Nature doesn't distinguish between Republicans and Democrats.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)I cannot give it to anyone else. Same as I cannot catch or infect others with measles, mumps, or chicken pox, without being vaccinated for them since having those diseases gives lifetime immunity.
Given that I haven't had the flu in 20 or 30 years (as with other poster my age), there must be something else going on? Let science investigate why not. They won't because that won't sell mass flu shots.
Vinca
(50,255 posts)If you visit your sick aunt in the meantime, she could be a goner. Oh, well. That's the price of being related to an anti-vax person. I guess it goes without saying you haven't had the pneumonia vaccinations recommended for older people. Good luck.
Since I am asymptomatic to the flu and pneumonia I gave both those to my husband, who got his flu shot and pneumonia vax. I must have also given him shingles too because I didn't get My shingles vax. I will leave you with a quote from his doctor concerning all 3 vaccinations."They aren't 100% effective"
Vinca
(50,255 posts)Shingles, by the way, cannot be passed from person to person. It's a dormant virus in your body that was planted there if you had chickenpox.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Shingles is not contagious. It is only contagious while the rash is oozing and then only for people who haven't had chicken pox who touch the rash. For those who have had chicken pox, touching the rash won't given them shingles, OR chicken pox AGAIN.
BTW, my "anti-vaxxer" 32 your old SIL, 38 year old daughter. and her 34 year old GF, all had Shingles because at their age "woo" doctors never recommended the vax for them, and insurance won't pay for young adults to get it. DEMAND IT!
At least do your research and know what you are talking about and what is and isn't contagious, and what your CDC recommends. You cannot make your case if you do not know what your are talking about. Take that from an "anti-vaxxter" Old Lady who should be dead already from all these deadly diseases.
Vinca
(50,255 posts)My physician told me, when I had it, that it wasn't contagious and cases other than originating in people who had chickenpox as a child were very rare.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Its that simple. Some things come with the job.
If your scared of the flu shot or have a bad reaction to it you shouldnt seek a job in health care.
If you are scared of heights you shouldnt take a job as a roofer.
If guns scare you then you shouldnt take a job in law enforcement.
If you hate kids you shouldnt take a job in teaching.
If you are scared of swimming you shouldnt take a job as a lifeguard.
Its not that hard a concept. People acting like these folks are victims of an evil employer or being forced to do something dont have a grasp of basic concepts like minimum job qualifications- if they job requires you get a flu shot, you get a flu shot.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Even if you're not a front-line medical professional, your flu virus can infect others. You're in the same hospital or same building. You should get the vaccine. I had to get tested for Hepatitis C despite the fact I was 99.9999999% sure I did not have it (I did not). It sucked but it was part of the job and was based on a rational reason.
dembotoz
(16,799 posts)U just do....
Or make a job change
Tatiana
(14,167 posts)I received it around 4 years ago due to being in the "at-risk" population and had a reaction so horrendous, I would have preferred getting the actual flu.
I haven't gotten it since then. If you have the flu, you stay home.
However, if this was specified as a condition of employment, then I would think the company has the right to fire the individuals.
Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)they have found that there is a large non-compliance with this.
Get shot or get out.
As a healthcare worker, I find this reasonable. I don't want to catch the flu from a coworker and I don't want them spreading it to the patients.
Hospital employers are notorious for firing employees when they are sick so many are fearful of calling in and come to work when they are ill.
ebbie15644
(1,214 posts)As someone who is in and out of the hospital, the last thing I need is to get the flu from someone that is supposed to be taking care of me
Lunabell
(6,078 posts)The flu can be deadly to some. I agree with this decision.