Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

canetoad

(17,152 posts)
3. OK, this is a bit convoluted
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 02:33 PM
Nov 2017

First thoughts, because the person who went to WaPo had such an outrageous story, was that she would get it out there. Then it would be proven untrue. Then Moore could discredit all his accusers.

Feasible?

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
4. That's the premise of this theory.
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 02:36 PM
Nov 2017

Personally, I think there's something to it, but proving so is the issue.

rainin

(3,011 posts)
9. Not crazy at all.
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 02:40 PM
Nov 2017

I must think like a criminal because I posited this idea aloud to my SO when Moore's accusers first went public. I said the R's will send out a fake accuser, discredit her, then use it to discredit them all.

I didn't anticipate the fake stories about Franken. I was half right about the means, but 100% right that the R's are liars and cheats!

Arkansas Granny

(31,514 posts)
10. If WaPo had published the story of Jaime Phillips it would have sooner or later been uncovered
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 02:40 PM
Nov 2017

as being false, possibly by James O'Keefe, himself. If one accuser could be discredited, it would serve to discredit the other reports that WaPo made about sexual misconduct by Moore. The testimony of the other women would have been dismissed, as well.

questionseverything

(9,651 posts)
16. it worked on acorn...remember how fast they were defunded?
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 04:59 PM
Nov 2017

the nyt was complicit in that, glad wp did a better job

genxlib

(5,524 posts)
6. That does sound fishy
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 02:36 PM
Nov 2017

I have bigger questions about the first gap than the second.

Would they really have the audacity to try and pull that off in one day. No wonder the PV story fell apart if it was constructed that quickly.

chowder66

(9,067 posts)
11. They probably had more time than that since the media typically asks the subject Moore
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 02:55 PM
Nov 2017

if they have any response before publishing. He most likely got on the phone to someone to do something about this.

genxlib

(5,524 posts)
12. I had actually included that insinuation myself
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 03:23 PM
Nov 2017

Then decided to edit it out.

It does make one wonder.

Then again, Okeefe isn't nearly the mastermind that he thinks he is so I wouldn't put it past him to rush headlong into something like that with no preparation.

So, it was either coordinated or reckless

chowder66

(9,067 posts)
13. It wouldn't take long either way. Obviously they have someone on speed dial.
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 03:26 PM
Nov 2017

My guess is that it was both coordinated and reckless.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
14. By Nov 9 - word would have been long out about WaPo reporters poking around...
Tue Nov 28, 2017, 03:29 PM
Nov 2017

Does anyone know when the WaPo reporters started this investigation...?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has anyone seen this time...