Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

shockey80

(4,379 posts)
Mon Dec 4, 2017, 10:22 AM Dec 2017

Legal question. What is the penalty for breaking your oath of office? Is it just useless words that

mean nothing? What would have happened if FDR said the attack on pearl harbor may have not been done by Japan. Fake news.

This is exactly what Trump has done with the Russia attack on our democracy. It's fucking madness. Do republicans only believe an attack can happen if bombs are dropped? What the fuck is wrong with these people.

Trump has broken his oath of office. He denies the attack. He has not asked for an investigation. He is not defending America, the constitution and our democracy. Yet , he pays no price from the people who voted for him. It doesn't get more dangerous than that.

The future of our democracy depends on one man, Mueller. He must bring conspiracy charges against the entire Whitehouse. All of them must go down. Hopefully I will not go insane before that happens.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Legal question. What is the penalty for breaking your oath of office? Is it just useless words that (Original Post) shockey80 Dec 2017 OP
We are now seeing the ugly truth emerge. Many of our democratic ideals Irish_Dem Dec 2017 #1
There are other birds...... MyOwnPeace Dec 2017 #2
I think such oaths are pretty much tradition, without a lot of meaning. There are other laws Hoyt Dec 2017 #3
They will be happy to spout "democracy" when the Senate acquits Trump world wide wally Dec 2017 #4
Means no more Bayard Dec 2017 #5
tRump will try to take advantage of the huge loophole in the oath he took... SeattleVet Dec 2017 #6
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
3. I think such oaths are pretty much tradition, without a lot of meaning. There are other laws
Mon Dec 4, 2017, 10:31 AM
Dec 2017

that might apply, but depending on an politician's -- or anyone else for that matter -- is about like holding people to their marriage vows.

Bayard

(22,035 posts)
5. Means no more
Mon Dec 4, 2017, 12:55 PM
Dec 2017

Than testifying under oath for these people. If you have no morals, no conscience, no problem lying, an oath is an act.

SeattleVet

(5,477 posts)
6. tRump will try to take advantage of the huge loophole in the oath he took...
Mon Dec 4, 2017, 04:52 PM
Dec 2017

it clearly states 'to the best of my ability', and he has absolutely NO ability.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Legal question. What is t...