Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amaryllis

(9,524 posts)
Wed Dec 6, 2017, 08:15 PM Dec 2017

By being the party of high morality Dems are self-neutering in face of unprecedented threats (Slate)

The Uneven Playing Field

snip

Al Franken, many argue, should now resign. He should resign immediately because there are credible accusers (another emerged Wednesday), and because the behavior alleged is sufficiently abhorrent that there is simply no basis to defend him. In this parade of unilateral disarmament, Trump stays, Conyers goes, Moore stays, Franken goes.

Is this the principled solution? By every metric I can think of, it’s correct. But it’s also wrong. It’s wrong because we no longer inhabit a closed ethical system, in which morality and norm preservation are their own rewards. We live in a broken and corroded system in which unilateral disarmament is going to destroy the very things we want to preserve.

snip

Sexual predation is bad and grotesque and disqualifying for national office and positions of power. Stipulated. Victim-shaming and claiming that “the people should decide” is contemptible avoidance of responsibility. But the question that remains is whether the analysis stops right there. I, too, would like to live in a world where the debate begins and ends with that proposition. But I don’t think any of us live in that world anymore. And this may not be the moment in which to try to resurrect it.

snip

My own larger concern is that becoming the party of high morality will allow Democrats to live with themselves but that the party is also self-neutering in the face of unprecedented threats, in part to do the right thing and in part to take ammunition away from the right—a maneuver that never seems to work out these days.

snip

Who knows why the GOP has lost its last ethical moorings? But this is a perfectly transactional moment in governance, and what we get in exchange for being good and moral right now is nothing. I’m not saying we should hit pause on #MeToo, or direct any less fury at sexual predators in their every manifestation. But we should understand that while we know that our good faith and reasonableness are virtues, we currently live in a world where it’s also a handicap.

Unilateral disarmament is tantamount to arming the other side. That may be a trade worth making in some cases. But it’s worth at least acknowledging that this is the current calculus. It’s no longer that when they go low, we get to go high. They are permanently living underground. How long can we afford to keep living in the clouds?

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2017/12/the_access_hollywood_formula_for_republican_redemption.html

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

onecaliberal

(32,813 posts)
1. The kicker is they're not calling for the same from accused pedophile, and the president, who was
Wed Dec 6, 2017, 08:17 PM
Dec 2017

accused of sexual assault by 14 women. We don't need their situational ethics and morals.

EarlG

(21,942 posts)
2. Yeah we should be the other party of low morality
Wed Dec 6, 2017, 08:27 PM
Dec 2017

Give the voters a choice between the party that lionizes its gropers and the other party that also does that.

Sounds like a plan. After all if Donald Trump can lose by three million votes and Alabama ends up electing a Republican, that must be proof that voters across America really like politicians who are accused of sexual harassment.

Republicans have lost their way ethically, so let's also do that.



EarlG

(21,942 posts)
9. Well, it is in so many words
Wed Dec 6, 2017, 08:50 PM
Dec 2017

The author makes the argument that Republicans are monsters, cites some victories that they had, and implies that Democrats need to become less ethical in order to emulate those victories.

Some quotes from the article:

"Sexual predation is bad and grotesque and disqualifying for national office and positions of power. Stipulated. Victim-shaming and claiming that 'the people should decide' is contemptible avoidance of responsibility. But..."

"I’m not saying we should hit pause on #MeToo, or direct any less fury at sexual predators in their every manifestation. But..."

And it ends with this: "They are permanently living underground. How long can we afford to keep living in the clouds?"

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
7. Dems cleaning house...
Wed Dec 6, 2017, 08:40 PM
Dec 2017

so they can turn to the charges against Trump and Roy Moore, if elected. The fact Schumer asked Franken to resign suggests, to me, there's big stuff going on... and we don't know the half of it.

XRubicon

(2,212 posts)
8. Yeah they should all get the same treatment
Wed Dec 6, 2017, 08:46 PM
Dec 2017

A guy who locks a coworker in his office and forces sex until she passes out or a guy that has sex with 14 year old should be treated the same as the guy that pulled some shit in public on camera admitted it and apologized, got it. Thanks.

diva77

(7,639 posts)
4. The punishment doesn't fit the crime for Franken -- no crime has been established.
Wed Dec 6, 2017, 08:32 PM
Dec 2017

Wait for an investigation to be completed.

 

Kirk Lover

(3,608 posts)
5. Maybe it's time to get on the phone and start bringing up this issue. Also I heard that there were
Wed Dec 6, 2017, 08:36 PM
Dec 2017

two payouts of taxpayer $$$..one was a D the other a R...both high profile. I'm thinking Conyers was the D.....why is the R's name still safe and under wraps. THIS IS BULLSHIT AND I SEE WTF IS GOING ON HERE.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»By being the party of hig...