Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

charles d

(99 posts)
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 04:06 AM Feb 2015

Clinton foundation’s global network overlaps with family’s political base

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Agschmid (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Washington Post

February 18 at 9:30 PM

Since its creation in 2001, the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation has raised close to $2 billion from a vast global network that includes corporate titans, political donors, foreign governments and other wealthy interests, according to a Washington Post review of public records and newly released contribution data.

The total, representing cash and pledges reported in tax filings, includes $262 million that was raised in 2013 — the year Hillary Rodham Clinton stepped down as secretary of state and began to devote her energies to the foundation and to a likely second run for president.

The financial success of the foundation, which funds charitable work around the world, underscores the highly unusual nature of another Clinton candidacy. The organization has given contributors entree, outside the traditional political arena, to a possible president. Foreign donors and countries that are likely to have interests before a potential Clinton administration — and yet are ineligible to give to U.S. political campaigns — have affirmed their support for the family’s work through the charitable giving.

The Post review of foundation data, updated this month on the group’s Web site to reflect giving through 2014, found substantial overlap between the Clinton political machinery and the foundation. Nearly half of the major donors who are backing Ready for Hillary, a group promoting her 2016 presidential bid, as well as nearly half of the bundlers from her 2008 campaign, have given at least $10,000 to the foundation, either on their own or through foundations or companies they run.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clintons-raised-nearly-2-billion-for-foundation-since-2001/2015/02/18/b8425d88-a7cd-11e4-a7c2-03d37af98440_story.html?hpid=z3



Mere coincidence, I'm sure.
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton foundation’s global network overlaps with family’s political base (Original Post) charles d Feb 2015 OP
This is surprising or suspicious? silverweb Feb 2015 #1
It's a made up problem. leftofcool Feb 2015 #2
Not Totally... WillyT Feb 2015 #17
Clinton foundation used Haitian relief $$$ to push corporate development Divernan Feb 2015 #3
+1000! snot Feb 2015 #4
Judicial Watch: Clintons pushed the most wasteful of US funded Haiti projects. Divernan Feb 2015 #5
LOL - Judicial watch run but RWNJ Larry Clayman OKNancy Feb 2015 #8
Your response is fact free and pure argle-bargle. Divernan Feb 2015 #14
You mean like Judicialwatch? Major Nikon Feb 2015 #16
You can never check out! Demeter Feb 2015 #6
Everyone needs to read this. nt Sienna86 Feb 2015 #13
What do you suppose Saudi Arabia wants as a quid pro quo? Scuba Feb 2015 #7
...and another RWNJ site used to slam the CLintons OKNancy Feb 2015 #9
Are you saying Saudi Arabia didn't donate to her foundation? Scuba Feb 2015 #10
no... OKNancy Feb 2015 #11
And what did that have to do with my post? The one to which you replied? And what do you .... Scuba Feb 2015 #12
You do the slamming with your fact free name calling. Divernan Feb 2015 #15
Locking. Agschmid Feb 2015 #18

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
1. This is surprising or suspicious?
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 04:30 AM
Feb 2015

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]People with money who admire the Clintons' charitable work donate to it... and many of the same people admire Hillary and think she would be a good president. How is that a bad thing?

As long as the finances are clean, legal, and completely separate for both the foundation and the campaign, what's the problem?



leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
2. It's a made up problem.
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 05:53 AM
Feb 2015
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
17. Not Totally...
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 10:17 AM
Feb 2015
The prevalence of financial institutions, both foreign and domestic, as major donors is likely to stir more unease in the Democratic Party’s liberal base, which is pushing Hillary Clinton to adopt a more populist and less Wall Street-focused economic agenda. The role of interests located in countries such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Argentina may spur questions about the independence of a potential commander in chief who has solicited money from foreign donors with a stake in the actions of the U.S. government.


From the article.


Divernan

(15,480 posts)
3. Clinton foundation used Haitian relief $$$ to push corporate development
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 05:59 AM
Feb 2015
Bill Clinton's shameful Haitian legacy as he facilitates U.S. business expansion

American companies and NGOs continue to receive the lion's share of US aid funding for projects in Haiti four years after the earthquake that leveled the capital Port-au-Prince, despite US government promises to spend more money through local organisations.
The picture at this link says it all - 5 Haitian women working, while Clinton and a bunch of aid workers are standing around.

http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/datablog/2014/jan/10/haiti-earthquake-us-aid-funding-data

Instead of Bill Clinton’s apology for destroying centuries of rural subsistence livelihood in Haiti with dumped Arkansas rice, as well as dumping US infertile seeds that depleted the land being made meaningful with new shelter and housing and reparations in the form of real investment in sustainable agriculture, the Clintons – one leading USAID, one leading the UN mission in Haiti – are building for- profit hotels in Port au Prince and in the North of Haiti.

But worst, over 300 farmers’ family-plots in the Northeast of Haiti were converted into the industrial zone for Korean textile giant Sae-A Trading. The “Korean” factory is built on good agricultural lands taken from Haiti peasants farmers without their approval and further destroys Haiti food sovereignty. ( Video: A Brief History of Haiti that Every American Should Know.)

US citizens are the project’s biggest investor and main owners, not Haiti. The Korean cover is useful to deflect the Clinton and US oligarchs’ intentions. The US one percent, make it a practice to use subcontractors, such as the Korean conglomerate, to deflect and preempt decent US consumer complaints of human rights abuses and unfair labor practices against the giant American companies the complex will service, such as GAP, Wal-Mart, Target and other major US retailers


http://www.ezilidanto.com/zili/2012/03/haiti-red-cross-misuse-quake-monies/

Instead of replacing housing for Haitians, the Clinton Foundation "facilitated" building a luxury hotel for business investors. http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/28/world/americas/haiti-hotel-clinton/index.html

snot

(10,518 posts)
4. +1000!
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 06:03 AM
Feb 2015

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
5. Judicial Watch: Clintons pushed the most wasteful of US funded Haiti projects.
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 06:03 AM
Feb 2015

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2013/07/clintons-pushed-most-wasteful-of-u-s-funded-haiti-projects/

Clintons Pushed Most Wasteful of U.S.-Funded Haiti Projects

JULY 02, 2013

Roughly half of the $1.14 billion that the U.S. government allocated to help Haiti recover from the 2010 earthquake has gone to wasteful projects with the single largest chunk—$170.3 million—going to a failed port and power plant adventure heavily promoted by Bill Clinton and the State Department under the leadership if his beloved wife.

Can you say scandal? The former president, who has been heavily involved in distributing Haiti earthquake reconstruction funds, pushed hard for the power plant and port for an industrial park in northern Haiti billed as the centerpiece of the United States’ effort to help the ravaged island nation rebuild. As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton joined her husband in the effort, making several trips to Haiti to promote the project and encourage foreigners to invest in it.

In fact, Bill and Hillary Clinton led a star-studded delegation last year to inaugurate the industrial park, located about 100 miles from Port-au-Prince, tied to the power plant and port. Hollywood actors, a famous fashion designer and a British business magnate joined the Clintons as did high-ranking Obama administration officials such as then Labor Secretary Hilda Solis.

Hillary delivered a heart-felt speech saying “we have been united behind a single goal – making investments in this country’s people and your infrastructure that help put Haiti finally on the path to broad-based economic growth with a more vibrant private sector and less dependence on foreign assistance. And we believe that our work here in Haiti and here in the north is beginning to show results.”

Not really, according to a federal audit of the $1.14 billion that Congress approved to help Haiti recover from the powerful earthquake that killed more than 200,000 and left over 1 million homeless. The probe was requested by a Florida congresswoman who chairs the House Middle East and North Africa Subcommittee because hundreds of millions have been spent in Haiti with virtually no accountability.

The Clinton-backed power and port venture is the biggest and most expensive failure mentioned in the report. An astounding $170.3 million later, it is years behind schedule, lacks a qualified engineer and has unrealistic timeframes. As a result, planning has been hindered, the report says, and “funding will be insufficient to cover a majority of projected costs.” It will take an additional $117 to $189 million to complete it and it’s unclear whether the Haitian government will be able to find a private sector company willing to finance the remainder of the project.

That means Uncle Sam must come to the rescue or the $170.3 million already wasted on the project will be lost. Either way, U.S. taxpayers get screwed. Besides the scandalous, Clinton-backed power and port experiment, congressional investigators found mismanagement of a crucial housing plan that was supposed to accommodate up to 90,000 Haitians. USAID claims it will only be able to handle 3,200 to 15,900 people at nearly double the original cost of $59 million. That means the cost per house is nearly triple the original estimate, according to the report.

Back to the Clinton prominence in all things Haiti; the United Nations named the former commander-in-chief as a special envoy to the island and his Clinton Foundation has raised $34 million for Haiti since the catastrophic earthquake hit. Additionally, the former president has distributed $54.4 million from the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund, which was launched shortly after the earthquake. The fund closed in December after distributing the last of the money and claims that it has “helped Haitians create a better future through smart, sustainable economic development” though it acknowledges that “much work remains to be done in Haiti.”

Combined with the U.S. government money and other charities that have raised huge sums for Haiti earthquake recovery, the island has received billions to rebuild. Yet three years later, news report after news report reveals that a large number of Haitians still live in deplorable, shanty town tent cities and an ongoing epidemic of cholera has claimed thousands of lives. Makes you wonder if someone is pocketing the money.

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
8. LOL - Judicial watch run but RWNJ Larry Clayman
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 07:25 AM
Feb 2015

desperate

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
14. Your response is fact free and pure argle-bargle.
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 08:04 AM
Feb 2015

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
16. You mean like Judicialwatch?
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 08:29 AM
Feb 2015

With the exception that OKNancy's response included only one assertion which most definitely is a fact, and just isn't that hard to figure out. YMMV.

http://www.thenation.com/article/klayman-watch#

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
6. You can never check out!
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 06:03 AM
Feb 2015

Sienna86

(2,148 posts)
13. Everyone needs to read this. nt
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 07:47 AM
Feb 2015
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
7. What do you suppose Saudi Arabia wants as a quid pro quo?
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 07:05 AM
Feb 2015

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
9. ...and another RWNJ site used to slam the CLintons
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 07:26 AM
Feb 2015
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
10. Are you saying Saudi Arabia didn't donate to her foundation?
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 07:32 AM
Feb 2015

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
11. no...
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 07:33 AM
Feb 2015

I'm pointing out the post by someone using Judicial Watch to slam the CLintons... just as I posted.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
12. And what did that have to do with my post? The one to which you replied? And what do you ....
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 07:41 AM
Feb 2015

... think Saudi Arabia wants as a quid pro quo for donating to the Clinton Foundation? Women's Rights?

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
15. You do the slamming with your fact free name calling.
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 08:09 AM
Feb 2015

Tons of facts about how the Clintons exploited the Haitian tragedy, leaving the U.S. taxpayers on the hook for their bungled, "non-profit", pro-corporate meddling, and leaving thousands of Haitians living in mud and shacks years after the tragedy. You got nuthin', and your posts are ample proof of that.

Imagine Hillary in charge of FEMA and taking this exploitative, profiteering approach to national disasters in the U.S.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
18. Locking.
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 10:36 AM
Feb 2015

This post does not meet the SOP for this forum:

Statement of Purpose

Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Clinton foundation’s glob...