ISIL fighters bulldoze ancient Assyrian palace in Iraq
Source: AlJazeera
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) fighters have used a bulldozer to start destroying a 3,000-year-old Assyrian city near Mosul in Iraq, archeologists and other sources have told Al Jazeera.
The reported demolition at Nimrud on Thursday comes less than a week after video was released showing ISIL fighters destroying ancient artefacts in a Mosul museum.
"They came at midday with a bulldozer and started destroying the palace," said an Iraqi official in touch with antiquities staff in Mosul.
Read more: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/03/isil-fighters-bulldoze-ancient-assyrian-palace-iraq-150305195222805.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
This is nothing short of cultural genocide. And according to the article, these animals have stated that they're not done yet. So will the remaining archeological sites be protected?
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Saudi Arabia Bulldozes Over Its Heritage
Over the last few years, mosques and key sites dating from the time of Muhammad have been knocked down or destroyed, as have Ottoman-era mansions, ancient wells and stone bridges. Over 98% of the Kingdoms historical and religious sites have been destroyed since 1985, estimates the Islamic Heritage Research Foundation in London. Its as if they wanted to wipe out history, says Ali Al-Ahmed, of the Institute for Gulf Affairs in Washington, D.C.
Though the Saudi rulers have a long history of destroying historical sites, activists say the pace and range of destruction has recently increased. A few months ago, the house of Hamza, the Prophet Muhammads uncle, was flattened to make way for a Meccan hotel, according to Irfan Al Alawi, executive director of the Islamic Heritage Research Foundation. There have even been rumored threats to Muhammads tomb in Medina and his birthplace in Mecca.
A 61-page report, published recently in Saudi Arabias Journal of the Royal Presidency, suggested separating the Prophets tomb from Medinas mosque, a task that would amount to its destruction, Alawi says. You cant move it without destroying it. Moreover, he alleges, plans for a new palace for King Abdullah threaten the library atop the site traditionally identified as the birthplace of Muhammad. Even now, signs in four languages warn visitors that there is no proof that the Prophet Muhammad was born there, so it is forbidden to make this place specific for praying, supplicating or get [sic] blessing.
Wahhabism, the prevailing Saudi strain of Islam, frowns on visits to shrines, tombs or religio-historical sites, on grounds that they might lead to Islams gravest sin: worshipping anyone other than God. In recent years, the twin forks of Wahhabi doctrine and urban development have speared most physical reminders of Islamic history in the heart of Mecca. The house of the Prophets first wife, Khadijah has made way for public toilets. A Hilton hotel stands on the site of the house of Islams first caliph, Abu Bakr. Famously, the Kaaba now stands in the shade of one of the worlds tallest buildings, the Mecca Royal Clock Tower, part of a complex built by the Bin Laden Group, boasting a 5-story shopping mall, luxury hotels and a parking garage.
http://time.com/3584585/saudi-arabia-bulldozes-over-its-heritage/
Wahhabism
closeupready
(29,503 posts)sometimes, you can't stop people from destroying themselves and their culture. I mean, destruction of artistic antiquities has been going on for as long as human civilization has existed.
devils chaplain
(602 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)They knew they were risking total destruction by doing so. They gambled and lost. The attempt to achieve a higher ideal may cost them in worldly terms, but it is a cost they agree to pay.
No metaphor is ever perfect, and thus, there will be differences between any two examples between which you are trying to draw a parallel.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)not the German people.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)gladium et scutum
(806 posts)58% of the bombers on the Dresden air raids were from RAF Bomber Command. The remaining 42% were 8th USAAF Bombers.
devils chaplain
(602 posts)These are maniacal religious freaks deliberately trashing priceless artifacts out of devotion to their cult. It's an entirely different act from regrettably risking that those things become a casualty of war.
The point is that their cult is deliberately hostile to human progress itself. The sooner that these creeps eat lead, the better off we'll be.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)eissa
(4,238 posts)This isn't some plot by the MIC, these are real people, some of the weakest and most vulnerable left. And both their lives and history are in the crosshairs.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Completely off topic, embarrassingly weird, makes one wonder about the motivation. Dresden was leveled by U.S. and British bombers.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)eissa
(4,238 posts)It's one thing if you don't value your own history, it's another to destroy another culture's historic treasures with the clear intent of wiping out any trace of their existence.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)so what Saudi Arabia is doing is destroying another culture's historic treasures.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)power through military might, math, astronomy, medicine, language, machines and collecting the great writings of the known world latter on.
The great inventions, writings and objects were kept in one great library that moved around the World with whomever was in power. While the library was in Alexandria Egypt, many of the works of the World's artifacts were destroyed in a great earthquake. The last place of the great world library was in Baghdad, land of Summer and Mesopotamia where Abraham and Sarah came from (Ur).
eissa
(4,238 posts)Arabs and Assyrians are not the same. Different ethnic groups, different culture. While Iraqis may value Sumerian/Babylonian/Assyrian history as being theirs in terms of it (currently) being Iraqi, they don't see it as theirs ethnically. The descendants of those civilizations -- Assyrians/Chaldeans -- do. That's a very important distinction.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)vkkv
(3,384 posts)We have them in the U.S. , too.
eissa
(4,238 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 5, 2015, 06:50 PM - Edit history (1)
To draw a parallel between the savages of ISIS -- a group that has spread death and destruction not seen since the Mongol hoards invaded the region -- and the idiotic, whiny Christians of Pat Robertson's ilk, is a false equivalency. Talk to me when the religious right literally round people up and slice off their heads for reasons ranging from belonging to the wrong sect to watching a soccer game. I know they may want to do that, but until that happens, they're nowhere near the realm of these barbarians.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)However death & destruction has been going in Iraq & Syria for years before the 2014 ISIS offensive.
eissa
(4,238 posts)Makes things so much easier. "Oh, that place has always been a mess, just turn it into a parking lot and be done with it."
But, no, death and destruction to this degree has not been seen in centuries. The genocide by the Ottoman Turks of the Armenians, Assyrians and Pontic Greeks (exactly 100 years ago this April) saw far more killings. But the murders, displacement, and destruction of cultural artifacts conducted by ISIS rivals the worst offenders, and they don't appear to be ending any time soon.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)The Wahhabi movement was part of a fundamentalist/revisionist movement within Islam that would lead to creation of the first Saudi State, and its crushing by the Ottoman empires Egyptian viceroy Muhammad Ali Pasha.
Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and the amir Muhammad ibn Saud launched their campaign to reform Islam and consolidate power in Arabia from their power-base in Diriyah. By 1805, the Wahhabis controlled Mecca and Medina, had attacked Karbala and the Imam Husayn Shrine.[1] The Wahhabis also attacked Ottoman trade caravans which interrupted the Ottoman finances.[2] The Saudi amir denounced the Ottoman sultan and called into question the validity of his claim to be caliph and guardian of the sanctuaries of the Hejaz[3] and the Ottoman empire instructed the upstart Muhammad Ali, viceroy of Egypt, to fight the Wahhabis. The Ottoman empire was suspicious of Muhammed Alis ambition, and thought that by ordering Ali against the Wahhabis, the defeat of either would be beneficial.[2]
uhammad Ali was ordered to crush the Saudi state as early as December 1807 by Sultan Mustafa IV, however internal strife within Egypt prevented him from giving full attention to the Wahhabis. The Egyptians were not able to recapture the holy cities until 1811.[3]
However, it would take until September 1818 for the Wahhabi state to end with the surrendering of the its leaders. Ibrahim Pasha, Muhammad Alis son, had taken over the campaign in 1817. Gaining the support of the volatile Arabian tribes by skillful diplomacy and lavish gifts, he advanced into central Arabia to occupy the towns of Unaizah and Buraidah. Joined now by most of the principal tribes, he appeared before the Saudi capital Diriyah in April 1818. With their march to Diriyah plagued by Wahhabi attacks, they arrived in Diriyah in April 1818. It took until September for the Wahhabis to surrender, in part due to Ibrahims poorly trained army. Diriyah was destroyed on June 1819, and Egyptian garrisons were posted in the principal towns. The head of the Wahhabi state, Amir Abd Allah, was sent to Constantinople to be executed.[3]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman%E2%80%93Wahhabi_War
Wahabbi = House of Saud = ISIS
To this degree? You probably don't realize Assad was named the #1 human rights violator of 2014. He has committed many atrocities, killing of mass civilians.
In Iraq Shia militias have been ethnically cleansing neighborhoods for years & the Iraqi government have been brutally oppressing the Kurdish & Sunni populations. Turn it into a parking lot? No far from that, I've been at the forefront arguing for a political solution.
Iraq's corruption continues unchecked
http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/02/iraq-contracting-corruption-reconstruction-projects.html
eissa
(4,238 posts)So, yes, very familiar with the regimes in both countries. And I still contend that their repression, horrific as it may have been, pales in comparison to the atrocities ISIS is committing. It's one thing to be targeted by a group for what you do, it's another to be rounded up for who you are.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)DhhD
(4,695 posts)ancient artifacts of culture and history of the past. Islam came to be about 650 AD. ISIL is trying to get the liberal voters to move over to the War Hawk GOP thinking. It will not happen.
ISIL has tried beheadings and setting oil wells on fire. That did not work. They tried setting Egyptian Coptic Christians free. That did not work. They are trying to reach out to the bloodthirsty American voter. Is the MIC helping ISIL? American Oil Companies began getting oil leases again a few years ago after the Shiite Iraq government caved in to accept the contracts.
madokie
(51,076 posts)directed at the bulldozers
Thanks, bush/cheney/kindasleezie
eissa
(4,238 posts)Totally justified here. According to the article, they're heading to Hatra, a World Heritage Site, next. That's not exactly in a residential neighborhood. You'd think they'd be able to see these guys driving their bulldozers there.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)pasto76
(1,589 posts)wouldnt take them long to use the site itself as a shield though
madokie
(51,076 posts)Thank bush/cheney for this crime against humanity on so many levels. Both should be in the dock at the Hague awaiting trial of so many charges related to this wrong murder of a county and it many good people. Iraqi people for the most part had no ill will towards us as individuals. Our policies toward them yes but toward me personally no.
Our President wants to and is trying to make things better but is met with bullshit at every turn. Sorry bastids the whole lot of the republiCONs.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)romanic
(2,841 posts)I know about them going to Tikrit (sp?) but why not send a platoon to Mosul and protect these sites? Hell, where are the rebel citizens at with guns to blow these Radical Islamic losers heads off???
eissa
(4,238 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)Way to go.
eissa
(4,238 posts)That's not bigotry, that's fact.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Why not send a platoon to Mosul? They need more than that.
eissa
(4,238 posts)Not sure what, if anything, will be left by then. Nice of them to give these guys a heads-up, though
Throd
(7,208 posts)Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)I don't think we can call it genocide. That word denotes slaughter of humans, not objects - even artistic ones that are more valuable to me than - well let's not go there. Since this is a new sort of atrocity, we need to think up a new word for it. I have no idea of what word would be appropriate, but genocide really isn't.
I don't know of any other culture on earth that made destroying art, history, and culture one of their prime directives.
eissa
(4,238 posts)Erasing physical proof of their existence, thereby removing their connection to their native lands, is that not cultural genocide?
Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)You don't have to agree with me, most people don't. I think genocide should only refer to killing humans. I don't know what to call the deliberate destruction of history and culture as a primary political objective.
As I plan to start studying Archeology in the Fall, I am deeply angered by this practice.
fingrin
(120 posts)Genocide
..any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
I would say destroying a peoples culture and identity does cause mental harm and can be used to justify the word genocide in this case.
(Dont get me started on Israel and how they deny genocide)
Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)Wikipedia just taught me that the word "Genocide" has a LEGAL definition so as to avoid it's being attributed to just whatever :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide
Throwing serious words around like M&M's will cheapen their impact over time, but that could be done explicitly and by design by some people who manipulate words and language to obscure the truth, for reasons of their ideological and political objectives.
Such as you seem to want to do, as evidenced by the last line of your post --- written proof that you don't understand the meaning of the word in question.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Sorry, that's just how it is...
Since the quoted language including "mental harm" is directly and accurately taken from the Genocide Convention of 1948, as Lemkin had authored it:
http://www.hrweb.org/legal/genocide.html
Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)Snark. Not dialogue. Good ol' DU.
Explanation: I am voting to hide because the poster thinks wrecking museum pieces (big crime, that) is the same as killing people. That's just dumb and that needs to be corrected. The poster is not taking this point even when instructed on it, which makes me wonder if this is one of those Holocaust deniers or just someone who is quirky and being a contrarian for trollish sport, or even someone who just doesn't get the significance--the deep significance, mind you--of the word GENOCIDE. Don't trifle with that word. Don't use it lightly. It has a precise meaning. If bodies are stacked like cordwood and an entire ethnicity of people are being wiped out, that's genocide. Destroying artifacts that have been catalogued, photographed, replicated and documented is what assholes do, but it's not genocide. There's no arguing about this, no back-and-forth. Words have meanings.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)You made a mistake. If you have a problem with the term of "genocide" as defined in the Genocide Conventions (language by Lemkin), say so, so do I. Just don't expose your ignorance and then fail to correct it.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)Spokesman for the 14th branch of the Kurdish Democratic Party (KDP) in Ninveh province Saeed Mumuzini told Rudaw news website that ISIS militants used buldozzers to destroy Hatra city.
...
Hatra floused during the 1st and 2nd centuries AD as a religious and trading center after it was captured the Parthian Empire.
Later on, the city became the capital of possibly the first Arab kingdom in the chain of Arab cities running from Hatra, in the northeast, via Palmyra, Baalbek and Petra, in the southwest.
http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2015/03/07/Reports-ISIS-bulldozed-ancient-Hatra-city-in-Mosul.html