Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 08:08 AM Mar 2015

Wikipedia to file lawsuit challenging mass surveillance by NSA

Source: Reuters

Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit organization that runs free online encyclopedia Wikipedia, will file a lawsuit against the National Security Agency and the U.S. Department of Justice, challenging the government's mass surveillance program.

The lawsuit, to be filed on Tuesday, alleges that the NSA's mass surveillance of Internet traffic in the United States — often called Upstream surveillance — violates the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech and association, and the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure.

The NSA's Upstream surveillance program captures communications with "non-U.S. persons" in order to acquire foreign intelligence information.

"By tapping the backbone of the internet, the NSA is straining the backbone of democracy," Lila Tretikov, executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation wrote in a blog post on its website.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/10/us-usa-nsa-wikipedia-idUSKBN0M60YA20150310

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wikipedia to file lawsuit challenging mass surveillance by NSA (Original Post) IDemo Mar 2015 OP
wikipedia.org Alkene Mar 2015 #1
"Upstream surveillance"? Now there's a Lunzian term. Dont call me Shirley Mar 2015 #2
The Age of Privacy is Dead and Gone....... Cryptoad Mar 2015 #3
What are "non-U.S. persons"? Trillo Mar 2015 #4
Corporations are people, my friend. closeupready Mar 2015 #5
legal definition of "person" Trillo Mar 2015 #6
Good. blackspade Mar 2015 #7

Alkene

(752 posts)
1. wikipedia.org
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 08:36 AM
Mar 2015
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upstream_collection


"Wikimedia and eight other organizations filing the lawsuit, including the Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International USA, will be represented by the American Civil Liberties Union".


Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
3. The Age of Privacy is Dead and Gone.......
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 09:41 AM
Mar 2015

The Digital Age drove a wooden stake thru its heart.......
Quit whining and get use to it..
If you are going to do anything you dont want the world to know about,,,, dont do it digitally!

Trillo

(9,154 posts)
4. What are "non-U.S. persons"?
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 11:14 AM
Mar 2015

Are global corporations who have offices all over the world including or not including the U.S. considered "non-U.S. persons"?

Trillo

(9,154 posts)
6. legal definition of "person"
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 11:27 AM
Mar 2015
person

n. 1) a human being. 2) a corporation treated as having the rights and obligations of a person. Counties and cities can be treated as a person in the same manner as a corporation. However, corporations, counties and cities cannot have the emotions of humans such as malice, and therefore are not liable for punitive damages. (See: party, corporation)


I guess it means anyone other than the U.S. government itself, including all government employees and politicians, since each of those are also natural persons separate from the U.S. entity.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Wikipedia to file lawsuit...