Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 03:29 PM Mar 2015

Secret Service Testing Drones, How To Disrupt Their Flying

Source: Associated Press

Mar 10, 1:25 PM EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Secret Service is conducting middle-of-the-night drone flights near the White House in secret tests to devise a defense against the unmanned aircraft, The Associated Press has learned.

The government-controlled drones will be flown between 1 a.m. and 4 a.m. during the next several weeks over parts of Washington -airspace that's usually off limits as a no-fly zone, according to a U.S. official briefed on the plans.

The official said the Secret Service is testing drones both for its own use in law enforcement and protection, and to identify how to defend against hostile drones. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because this person was not authorized to publicly discuss the plans. The Secret Service has said details are classified.

Among the tests is the use of signal-jamming technology to thwart control of a remotely piloted aircraft, the official said.

Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SECRET_SERVICE_DRONES?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-03-10-13-25-35

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Secret Service Testing Drones, How To Disrupt Their Flying (Original Post) Purveyor Mar 2015 OP
This is simple. RoccoR5955 Mar 2015 #1
Doesn't work against autonomous drones. n/t eggplant Mar 2015 #9
Explain to me RoccoR5955 Mar 2015 #10
Because autonomous quads don't use a frequency. Xithras Mar 2015 #12
I'll try. eggplant Mar 2015 #16
Couldn't the GPS be disrupted? LiberalFighter Mar 2015 #17
Yes, GPS could easily be disrupted. RoccoR5955 Mar 2015 #19
GPS is the weak link RoccoR5955 Mar 2015 #20
As I said previously, there are lots of different ways navigation can be accomplished. eggplant Mar 2015 #21
And how much you have to spend One_Life_To_Give Mar 2015 #23
I'm not suggesting it is plausible or even remotely (!) likely. eggplant Mar 2015 #25
Which frequency would that be? Angleae Mar 2015 #24
I am sure that the CIA, with their budget RoccoR5955 Mar 2015 #26
Except that would also jam police, fire dept, secret service, aircraft, and anyone else that uses it Angleae Mar 2015 #29
no big whoops there! n/t RoccoR5955 Mar 2015 #30
Another Spy Vs. Spy toy. dixiegrrrrl Mar 2015 #2
I really wonder why this testing is done over the White House? peace13 Mar 2015 #3
I would think you be right. LiberalFighter Mar 2015 #18
Exactly. Makes no sense because someone else coul put a drone up during that time for more nefarious peacebird Mar 2015 #28
Nothing like locking the cage after the bird has flown, guys! Demeter Mar 2015 #4
The only way to fight a bad drone nykym Mar 2015 #5
So that's why my garage door keeps opening and closing Brother Buzz Mar 2015 #6
Might be your neighbor awoke_in_2003 Mar 2015 #11
Could be Brother Buzz Mar 2015 #13
Ohm my :) awoke_in_2003 Mar 2015 #14
Where do I get one of those? :D LiberalFighter Mar 2015 #22
I wonder if it is part of building code... awoke_in_2003 Mar 2015 #27
Yay… Raine1967 Mar 2015 #7
Do these people know anything? geomon666 Mar 2015 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #15
 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
1. This is simple.
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 03:44 PM
Mar 2015

You just have to jam the frequency. This should not be a major task for the Secret Service. With their resources I could do it in a heartbeat. I think that this is just an excuse for some of the boys to have toys to play with late into the night.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
10. Explain to me
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 05:56 PM
Mar 2015

How frequency jamming does not work on autonomous drones?
I could use the education.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
12. Because autonomous quads don't use a frequency.
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 06:20 PM
Mar 2015

Autonomous means they move without remote input. I.e., the quadcopter is programmed to travel from point A to point B without any sort of remote control or monitoring.

My son has two quads capable of autonomous flight, and each is capable of flying several miles without any input. In his case, it's programmed as an autoreturn feature...if the quadcopter loses its connection to "home", it will automatically fly itself back to its designated landing place for recovery. There are plenty of other things it can be used for though.

eggplant

(3,911 posts)
16. I'll try.
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 08:36 PM
Mar 2015

What most people call "drones" today (in the amateur sense, not the military) are just the modern version of radio controlled (RC) planes. Think "drone = helicopter." Someone on the ground has a control stick with a transmitter, and there is a radio receiver in the plane (or drone) in this case. The drone is driven around and has no intelligence of any kind built in. In fancy ones, there are cameras on the drones that broadcast video back to the driver, so they have a first-person view to spy on things, take beautiful photos, or just to not crash into things. Those types of drones an be taken down by frequency jamming, although it can be defeated with enough fancy hardware (but then we're moving closer to military than civilian).

An autonomous drone is one that is given commands either prior to taking off or in-flight. The drone has its own sensors (cameras, GPS, dead reckoning) and determines for itself the best way to accomplish its mission. In this case, there is no radio signal to jam, since there is nobody driving it. If the drone is using radio in its sensors (radar, for example), then it might lose the use of those sensors. A fancy automated drone could probably cope with the loss of some sensors, but perhaps with less accuracy or efficiency. If the drone is broadcasting video, audio, etc back to its owner, then *that* signal could be jammed. But it wouldn't stop the drone from recording it onto (say) an SD card. Once the drone returned from its mission (assuming it was able to), the SD card could be retrieved.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
20. GPS is the weak link
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 10:29 PM
Mar 2015

I could disable GPS with a radio signal to jam the GPS signal. Here's an article on how to do it: http://gpssystems.net/gps-jamming/

Again, the drone would not know where it is, and therefore could not complete its mission.

Now, if you feel that they STILL could not be stopped, please tell me how.
Thanks.

eggplant

(3,911 posts)
21. As I said previously, there are lots of different ways navigation can be accomplished.
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 11:55 PM
Mar 2015

My wife's car has GPS, but it doesn't always have signal. During those times, it uses dead reckoning to approximate its location until it can reacquire a signal.

Other solutions include on-board cameras that can identify specific objects and can triangulate from there. Or cell phone towers. Or infrared (heat) signatures. Even navigating by sound. It all depends on what your goal is, and how much accuracy you require.

Maybe the goal is to fly to where the jammer is and disrupt it.

Anything can be stopped if you know how it works and what its mission is. But if not, well, people can get pretty creative.

One_Life_To_Give

(6,036 posts)
23. And how much you have to spend
Wed Mar 11, 2015, 07:51 AM
Mar 2015

Most toys are not going to install an Inertial Reference Frame to preform DedReckoning. Targeting the Jamming antennae is only usefull with additional purpose built devices intended to exploit the down time of the Jamming systems antennae. And in the case of Potus once anything remotely looking like a sophisticated attack is underway, he/she would be swept away to the bunker.

eggplant

(3,911 posts)
25. I'm not suggesting it is plausible or even remotely (!) likely.
Wed Mar 11, 2015, 10:04 AM
Mar 2015

I was answering the question earlier as to why jamming isn't a slam dunk against these things, and the difference between autonomous and remotely controlled.

I have a hard time imagining that anyone could pull off a small drone attack. They are too small to carry much, anything they carry would likely be picked up by radiation or bio sensors, and they don't move fast enough to be a real threat. It would make a good (?) plot line for an action movie, but that's about it.

Angleae

(4,482 posts)
24. Which frequency would that be?
Wed Mar 11, 2015, 08:05 AM
Mar 2015

They would have to know beforehand what frequency they are using or they have to jam the entire VHF band.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
26. I am sure that the CIA, with their budget
Wed Mar 11, 2015, 10:22 AM
Mar 2015

could jam the entire VHF, UHF, AM, FM, Cell Phone, GPS, TV, Short Wave and any other bands simultaneously.

Google could be a friend here.

Angleae

(4,482 posts)
29. Except that would also jam police, fire dept, secret service, aircraft, and anyone else that uses it
Wed Mar 11, 2015, 08:23 PM
Mar 2015

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
2. Another Spy Vs. Spy toy.
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 04:02 PM
Mar 2015

Soon we will have the anti-Drone technology, to be followed by the Anti-Anti Drone Technology, to be followed by ...........

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
3. I really wonder why this testing is done over the White House?
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 04:07 PM
Mar 2015

If I lived there I would suggest that the testing be done off site until perfected and then have the security protocol initiated without announcing it to the general public. I Expect security to be a bubble over and around the building. Whatever it takes to keep the premises safe. Really, are they trying to desensitize folks to the crafts so a successful attack can be made? Head shake on this!

Edited to add....that the person with the big mouth should be found...and fired.

LiberalFighter

(50,825 posts)
18. I would think you be right.
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 09:12 PM
Mar 2015

There shouldn't be any need to test at the WH until they work out kinks before hand.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
28. Exactly. Makes no sense because someone else coul put a drone up during that time for more nefarious
Wed Mar 11, 2015, 05:09 PM
Mar 2015

reasons. How would the SS know it was not one of theirs?

nykym

(3,063 posts)
5. The only way to fight a bad drone
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 04:17 PM
Mar 2015

is with a good drone with a gun!
Thanks to an unnamed lobby group
(It's Sarcasm)

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
11. Might be your neighbor
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 06:01 PM
Mar 2015

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="

" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Brother Buzz

(36,407 posts)
13. Could be
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 06:25 PM
Mar 2015

The crazy electrician that installed it said he had to go next door and borrow a cup of electricity



 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
27. I wonder if it is part of building code...
Wed Mar 11, 2015, 04:34 PM
Mar 2015

or electricians having a sense of humor, but it seems every where I have lived have had one switch that nobody knew what it did.

Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Secret Service Testing Dr...