AIPAC urges Obama to strengthen ties with Netanyahu
Source: ToI
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) on Thursday night called on Washington to strengthen its ties with Israel following the reelection of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and castigated the White House for its cool response to the Israeli leaders statements that contrary to his preelection stance he supports the two-state solution.
Today, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu strongly and clearly reaffirmed his commitment to a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a statement by AIPAC said.
Unfortunately, administration spokespersons rebuffed the prime ministers efforts to improve the understandings between Israel and the US, it continued. In contrast to their comments, we urge the administration to further strengthen ties with Americas most reliable and only truly democratic ally in the Middle East.
A solid and unwavering relationship between the US and Israel is in the national security interests of both countries and reflects the values that we both cherish.
Read more: http://www.timesofisrael.com/aipac-urges-obama-to-strengthen-ties-with-netanyahu/#ixzz3Uvj2xXk3
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)2naSalit
(86,569 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)old guy
(3,283 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,370 posts)Or at least delete the first "A."
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Trustworthy. He want to talk about Iran's ability to abide by agreements and he goes and pulls his stunts. We should send Tom Cotton and Netanyahu on a field trip to wonder in the wilderness for forty years.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)2naSalit
(86,569 posts)they'd destroy the wilderness simply by being there.
Both are a waste of good air that could be put to better use by endangered species.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Exist with these two.
2naSalit
(86,569 posts)the bears would take care of that.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)2naSalit
(86,569 posts)but bears are omnivores and eat some pretty nasty stuff. Wouldn't be surprised if they wouldn't touch them after the kill though.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)We are not the Palestinians, we aren't forced to kiss Israel's ass. AIPAC always forgets America's interests and puts Israel's first.
And as far as being an ally, that's bullshit. Israel is a liability to us. The only thing reliable about Israel is that it takes the US for granted.
EEO
(1,620 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Let's not pretend that anyone in that organization has the best interests of the United States at heart.
Oh please.
movonne
(9,623 posts)one after???? we now know he lies...either to his people or ours???
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)it's also the one Israeli voters wanted, as shown by their election results
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)I'm not the one you need
You say you're lookin' for someone
Who's never weak but always strong
To protect you an' defend you
Whether you are right or wrong
Someone to open each and every door
But it ain't me, babe
No, no, no, it ain't me babe It ain't me you're lookin' for, babe.
Go lightly from the ledge, babe
Go lightly on the ground
I'm not the one you want, babe
I will only let your down
You say you're lookin' for someone
Who will promise never to part
Someone to close his eyes for you
Someone to close his heart
Someone who will die for you an' more
But it ain't me, babe
No, no, no, it ain't me babe
It ain't me you're lookin' for, babe.
Go melt back into the night
Everything inside is made of stone
There's nothing in here moving
An' anyway I'm not alone
You say you're looking for someone
Who'll pick you up each time you fall
To gather flowers constantly
An' to come each time you call
A lover for you life an' nothing more
But it ain't me, babe
No, no, no, it ain't me, babe
It ain't me you're lookin' for, babe.
They help orchestrate an affront to a sitting president, including a letter, now they have the
fucking gall to point the blame at Obama while they back peddle for Bibi.
AIPAC, idiots on steroids.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)karynnj
(59,503 posts)Who's never weak but always strong
To protect you an' defend you
Whether you are right or wrong
All he needs to add is " to veto each and every resolution, whether our policy or not."
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)...to veto each and every resolution, whether our policy or not."
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)And it isn't the poor in America.
louis-t
(23,292 posts)a two-state solution. Never. Not once. Ever.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Made me laugh so, so hard. This "unwavering relationship" has brought nothing good to the United States, in terms of security. Quite the opposite.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)he supported the two state solution?
or when he said (pre-election) he did not support a two-state solution
or when he recently said (post-election) that he supports a two state solution?
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)youre damn right I would expect to have control over security, This was viewed by many as casting Clinton's support for a two-state solution into doubt. http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/08/hillary-clinton-failure-to-help-syrian-rebels-led-to-the-rise-of-isis/375832/
Apparently, Bibi assumes that the next US President will see things much more his way than does Barack Obama. If Hillary is the nominee, he may be right.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)between the GOP and Democrats on the subject of Israel you are probably correct. Even progressive heroes like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are remarkably mainstream when it comes to Israel
leveymg
(36,418 posts)this body-slam to Obama because it is so widely presumed that Hillary is the inevitable candidate, and because as she has said, "there is no daylight" between herself and Netanyahu on issues impacting Israel, such as Palestine and Iran. With this context, expect Bibi to get even more maximalist in his positions, and the Mideast to edge ever closer to total war.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)She knows Netanyahu doesn't support the two-state solution. She holds much the same beliefs as Obama, but has always been more willing to pander to the "Israel uber alles" due to her general lack of political courage.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)During the same interview with CNN, Hillary also alluded to her complicated (theatrical) relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu while she was Secretary of State. I was often the designated yeller, she said. Her criticism has been far more muted since leaving the Obama Administration. http://jpupdates.com/2014/07/27/hillary-clinton-bashed-israels-settlement-activity-highlights-yelling-sessions-w-netanyahu/
Bibi can take likely solace in Hillary's deeply-held ambiguity.
Bette R. Daize
(43 posts)...they have overplayed their hand and worn out their welcome.
..."Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu strongly and clearly".....LIED. He already said what he is committed to doing.
No one left to listen but the legion of hand puppets they own in DC and the puppets are getting lots of pressure from their constituents to quit shilling for these bunch of liars and users.
We do not consent to waging and funding their wars.
It is the time for peace and those who are not with the program can fend for themselves.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)karynnj
(59,503 posts)if he expects respect in return.
The fact is that Netanyahu lied at least once this week -- and he wants us to accept that there is no difference between the two completely opposite statements.
It is Netanyahu's dishonesty that AIPAC should be asking about -- ie how can Jews in the diaspora defend Israel, when the PM makes thugish unhelpful comments.
jomin41
(559 posts)ignore AIPAC and go balls/walls to improve our relationship with Iran. IMHO
onecaliberal
(32,829 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)I've got some beachfront property by the Sea of Tranquility that might interest you. Great prices if you buy now.
[center]
?fit=580%2C580
[/center]
Trajan
(19,089 posts)I'm in !
jwirr
(39,215 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Go to hell assholes!
Hey maybe AIPAC can funnel more millions in from overseas and bribe more Senators and congressman!!
Thanks SCOTUS! (you fucking traitorous bastards!)
Little Tich
(6,171 posts)The US has no obligation to accept bad behaviour from a supposedly friendly country. Its significant that AIPAC isnt telling Netanyahu to stop destroying the good relationship with the US, instead its the US President who should take the abuse and apologize for having a backbone.
This is exactly why I dont like AIPAC.