Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,494 posts)
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 07:31 AM Oct 2015

U.S. Steel Canada should stop paying retiree benefits: restructuring monitor

Source: Hamilton Spectator

By Mark McNeil

The court-appointed monitor overseeing U.S. Steel Canada's restructuring says "a near-term cessation of operations will be necessary" if the company is not given relief from paying retiree benefits, among other things.

And as those words reverberated through the company's pensioner community Monday, eyes are focusing on a Toronto courtroom Wednesday and Thursday where the issue could be decided.

With the overseer of the process agreeing with the company's contention, United Steelworkers Local 1005 president Gary Howe says, "This week is a critical week."

He and other steelworker union leaders are organizing a protest outside the courtroom, and on Monday union members took to the sidewalk in front of Conservative MP David Sweet's campaign office on Upper James Street.

FULL story at link.


US STEEL
John Rennison,The Hamilton Spectator
The court-appointed monitor overseeing U.S. Steel Canada's restructuring says “a near term cessation of operations will be necessary” if the company is not given relief from paying retiree benefits.

Read more: http://www.thespec.com/news-story/5945411-u-s-steel-canada-should-stop-paying-retiree-benefits-restructuring-monitor/



You earn a benefit. You budget how much you you need to live when you retire. Losing pension, drug, dental, vision and other benefits blows your math out of the water!
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Steel Canada should stop paying retiree benefits: restructuring monitor (Original Post) Omaha Steve Oct 2015 OP
How much is enough before we the workers Hotler Oct 2015 #1
Where did the pension fund go? Nac Mac Feegle Oct 2015 #2
+100%! Enthusiast Oct 2015 #3
+101!!!! nc4bo Oct 2015 #4
I bet the pensions of the executives aren't touched at all. hobbit709 Oct 2015 #5
Nope. As in Amerika, executive pensions go into a trust fund, untouchable by the courts. Fuddnik Oct 2015 #8
THEY US STEEL CANADA......................and US Steel AMERICA ............ turbinetree Oct 2015 #6
the taxpayer does not foot the bill for the PBGC. The PBGC is funded out of the premiums antigop Oct 2015 #7
Which isn't nearly enough. Fuddnik Oct 2015 #9
No argument there, Fudd...but it's not funded by the taxpayer as the poster claimed. nt antigop Oct 2015 #15
If the insurance premiums were underfunded by the company--------- turbinetree Oct 2015 #10
yes, you are wrong. The PBGC is not funded by the taxpayer...it's right on their website antigop Oct 2015 #14
Yeah, and that's why some Unions are concerned with insovent retirement funds Babel_17 Oct 2015 #16
No corporation has the right to operate while stealing from the employee pension fund. fasttense Oct 2015 #11
They do take a risk............................ turbinetree Oct 2015 #12
This $#*! is commonplace in the Lower 48 KamaAina Oct 2015 #13
Globalism can be a race to the bottom, if we let it Babel_17 Oct 2015 #17
This time we need to see an honorable judgement, if it's ever going to happen. n/t Judi Lynn Oct 2015 #18

Hotler

(11,394 posts)
1. How much is enough before we the workers
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 07:54 AM
Oct 2015

take to the streets by the hundreds of thousands? When the fuckers on Wall St. crashed the economy in 2008 there should have been protest the likes this country has never seen before, but instead there was maybe a couple of hundred of us here and there.
When? When will the people get fighting made? Sitting behind a keyboard bitching will not do anything.

I have no hope. I see no future.

Nac Mac Feegle

(969 posts)
2. Where did the pension fund go?
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 07:55 AM
Oct 2015

Dollars to donuts the executives got huge payouts while running the company into bankruptcy. So much that they couldn't afford to pay the pension fund.

Or was Bain Capitol involved?

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
4. +101!!!!
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 08:27 AM
Oct 2015

Too bad screwing over workers isn't punishable with significant prison time and loss of ALL wealth including personal assets.

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
8. Nope. As in Amerika, executive pensions go into a trust fund, untouchable by the courts.
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 09:06 AM
Oct 2015

Lower and middle management usually get screwed the worst, but the parasites at the top steal it all,

turbinetree

(24,683 posts)
6. THEY US STEEL CANADA......................and US Steel AMERICA ............
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 08:57 AM
Oct 2015

made an agreement, they signed an agreement, there word is not even worth the paper they are written on.
Then to have a "monitor" great word "monitor" makes everything have that feely, fuzzy warm feeling says this................

No wonder human beings are upset---------we all should be upset

"The court-appointed monitor overseeing U.S. Steel Canada's restructuring says "a near-term cessation of operations will be necessary" if the company is not given relief from paying retiree benefits, among other things."

And just guess what CANADA just did, there infamous trade negotiators just rubber stamped the TPP agreement.

Do they realize that this is a sovereignty issue of national security implications, on everyone including there promise of paying out pensions--------------------do they really think workers of the country are that stupid, its all tied together.
They (Canada) have an election pretty soon and that conservative right wing leadership is more than likely going to get voted out, if I were them I would seriously void that TPP "deal" and start asking question as to where the pension money is----you US Canada signed an agreement and now you want to change the terms in the middle of the river-------really ---------------they screw everyone unless you are a crony and are on the take, just look at this "Monitoring Deal" -----------------amazing

The company was robbing the pension funds , employees where putting there agreed amount in the fund, the company on the other hand said they were also, and more than likely in team meetings saying the funds are protected and they are fully funded-----------------well now it's known that it was a LIE.

But in fact were not and were using the fund as a piggy bank to go do what, buy another company, use the funds for what reason.

In the airline industry from which I was employed they were doing the same thing .
To get money the airline would then go to another airline to merge or code share routes, and then promise to use the funds to pay back the borrowed money from the other airline, pay measly dividends or none at all to price support the shareholder, give bonuses to the CEO and others --------------------I know, I seen it with my own eyes in the airline industry, this dichotomy that deregulation's was a good thing and would lower prices---------well, almost 35-40 years later how many airlines are left------------not many, there is no competition, just like this TPP trade deal" the same thing will play out and then there will be more "monitors" telling the dwindling pensioners sorry your out of luck

This is why airline workers, mine workers , and other industries that went into bankruptcy here in the states, they saw there pension wiped out, and placed in the PBGC (so that the taxpayer has to foot the bill, the employee gets half of what they were promised, the company reorganizes and walks away from there promise to fund the plan-------------and now they offer these worthless 401k plans--------------oh boy , place your bets with wall street, -------no thanks-----------there worse, I have to balance my check book why didn't you) and to top it all off when they file there 10K paperwork, they have a accounting charge to make it look good on the prospectus, that everything is fully funded so they get more money from the crooks.
I mean just look at what Goldman Sach's did with Greece-----------------its the same.

And here in the US, we have a president jumping up and down with his trade hypocrite corporate lackey signing the TPP "Deal"---------that's a fact, what about the promises-------------------for retirees-----------------did you think about that when you signed the sovereignty away on that worthless piece of paper, now those pensions are in jeopardy, and some in the MSM are touting this thing again?





I tell you what ----------------------enough is enough




Honk--------------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016





antigop

(12,778 posts)
7. the taxpayer does not foot the bill for the PBGC. The PBGC is funded out of the premiums
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 09:02 AM
Oct 2015

Last edited Tue Oct 6, 2015, 07:58 PM - Edit history (1)

that companies with pension plans pay.

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
9. Which isn't nearly enough.
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 09:14 AM
Oct 2015

It's a sham to give the workers a false sense of security, and give the company an incentive to loot the fund.

Went through it with LTV Steal. 60% cut in monthly pension. No more medical, dental, or vision benefits.

turbinetree

(24,683 posts)
10. If the insurance premiums were underfunded by the company---------
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 10:19 AM
Oct 2015

somewhere you and I had to pay for the PBGC.

I have to go out and get liability insurance or full coverage for a car.

If I get liability insurance and have an accident, the other insurance policy holders in my company have to pay for that accident costs to the other insurance company (the liability insurance only covers the other person), my rates can go up to off set that cost, that is a tax, my premium costs go up.

It is better to have the fund insurance fully funded to drive down the costs on the consumer and the tax.
The company is suppose to fund or help fund that insurance--------------- they shifted that cost unto the PBGC, they have not fully insured the costs premium
Some where the bankrupt company only paid a percentage of the insurance to the PBGC, that underpayment places my pension in default, I in turn get a cut in my already taxed benefits, my earned benefits were taxed to fully in the beginning to fund the benefits, I am now footing the insurance bill tax into the PBGC.

If I am wrong I am wrong, but I as a taxpayer, I foot the insurance bill of the PBGC, because apparently the company did not pay for the full coverage of the premium to cover the benefits, they paid for liability

http://www.pbgc.gov/about/faq/pg/general-faqs-about-pbgc.html

antigop

(12,778 posts)
14. yes, you are wrong. The PBGC is not funded by the taxpayer...it's right on their website
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 07:56 PM
Oct 2015
http://pbgc.gov/about/factsheets/page/pbgc-facts.html
How PBGC Operates

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) protects the retirement benefits of more than 41 million workers and retirees. For more information on PBGC and the people we help, please visit our Who We Are page.

Where the money comes from

PBGC revenue does not come from the use of general fund tax dollars
It is derived from:
Insurance premiums paid by nearly 24,000 insured defined benefit pension plans
assets from terminated trusteed plans
Investment income
Recoveries from companies that sponsored failed plans

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
16. Yeah, and that's why some Unions are concerned with insovent retirement funds
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 08:49 PM
Oct 2015

Long story short, well run funds resent seeing their insurance premiums climb. But as more funds slide into insolvency, something has to give. I guess you already know this, I'm just posting this to the thread as additional info.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
11. No corporation has the right to operate while stealing from the employee pension fund.
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 11:09 AM
Oct 2015

If they can't operate without paying their pensions, then they should not be running a company.

Either way the employees are screwed, screwed, screwed. Now tell me how an employee does NOT take a risk every time they take a job with a corporation?

turbinetree

(24,683 posts)
12. They do take a risk............................
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 12:55 PM
Oct 2015

but they are told, they are shown, that in the meetings that the pension funds are fully insured, they are not.

This is why hedge funds are always lurking, looking at those pension funds, look no further than Frank Lorenzo and Carl Ichan, Mitt Romney, they rob the plans to pay down the debt and pay themselves and then withhold the funds and liquidate the company, and then tax payers are left holding the bag, homeless, unemployed, no money going into your social security, medicare.

The 10K filing shows what they put in the funds and what charges they take to the funds.

They can short change the plans fund and say they will catch up on the plan, this is legal today and from the past.

Then when they go and borrow more money to operate they have to pay a higher bond---------because they show they can't fund the plan properly---------------this then is placed on the backs of the worker on the other end, and even then all the company has to do is file for bankruptcy and say they don't have the funds, and place it in the PBGC and get an insurance to cover whatever percentage they can afford

Can you or I do this, hell no, if we file for bankruptcy they can garnish your pay check, and if your on social security they can take your money to pay off school debt, while these guys wipe there book clean.




Honk------------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
17. Globalism can be a race to the bottom, if we let it
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 01:01 AM
Oct 2015

And we just can't trust the Globalists. They count on profits from stuff done in the dark.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Steel Canada should ...