UN to call on governments around the world to decriminalise all drugs, says Richard Branson
Source: The Independent
The British entrepreneur appears to have released details of an embargoed UN report - in case they change their minds
Adam Withnall @adamwithnall 40 seconds ago
The UN may be about to call on the governments of all countries to end the "war on drugs" and decriminilise the use and possession of all illegal substances.
In an extraordinary post on his Virgin website, Richard Branson said he had been shown a report by the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) which dramatically changed the organisation's stance on drug control.
He said the "as-yet unreleased statement" had been sent to some of the world's media under embargo, but the businessman has gone public with it early for fear the UN will "bow to pressure by not going ahead with this important move".
The UN was preparing to declare "unequivocally that criminalisation is harmful unnecessary and disproportionate", Branson wrote. A document changing the UN stance on drug control was supposed to be released at a conference in Malaysia on Sunday, he said, but that has now been delayed.
Read more: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/un-to-call-on-governments-around-the-world-to-decriminalise-all-drugs-says-richard-branson-a6699851.html
If that's what the "new world order" is, I'll take it.
Update, found it...
In an as-yet unreleased statement circulated to the BBC, myself and others, the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), which has shaped much of global drug policy for decades, call on governments around the world to decriminalise drug use and possession for personal consumption for all drugs. This is a refreshing shift that could go a long way to finally end the needless criminalisation of millions of drug users around the world. The UNODC document was due to be launched at the International Harm reduction conference in Malaysia yesterday.
My colleagues on the Global Commission on Drug Policy and I could not be more delighted, as I have stated in embargoed interviews for the likes of the BBC. Together with countless other tireless advocates, Ive for years argued that we should treat drug use as a health issue, not as a crime. While the vast majority of recreational drug users never experience any problems, people who struggle with drug addiction deserve access to treatment, not a prison cell.
Yet, in their zeal for chasing the illusion of a drug-free world, governments have poured billions into tough law enforcement that did nothing to reduce drug supply or demand, or take control from the criminal organisations in charge of the global drug trade. In the US alone, over 1.5 million people were arrested in 2014 on non-violent drug charges, 83 per cent of those solely for possession. Globally, more than one in five people sentenced to prison are sentenced for drug offences.
Its exciting that the UNODC has now unequivocally stated that criminalisation is harmful, unnecessary and disproportionate, echoing concerns about the immense human and economic costs of current drug policies voiced earlier by UNAIDS, the World Health Organisation, UNDP, The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, UN Women, Kofi Annan and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.
If you look at the available evidence, UNODC is on the right side of history. In places where decriminalisation has been tried, like Portugal, drug-related deaths were reduced significantly, as were new HIV or Hepatitis infections. Combined with harm reduction programmes, decriminalisation will save lives as people who use drugs will no longer fear arrest and punishment when accessing healthcare services, it will also reduce crime and ease the burden on prison systems and law enforcement agencies.
As the UN General Assembly gears up for the first drug debate in 18 years next April, I hope this groundbreaking news will empower and embolden governments everywhere, including the UK, to do the right thing and consider a different course in drug policy. In the face of overwhelming evidence, UN expert opinion, and international human rights law, its not decriminalisation that sends the wrong message - its the continued refusal to engage, review or discuss reform.
Its good to see evidence and common sense prevail at UNODC. Which government wouldnt agree with that? But as I'm writing this I am hearing that at least one government is putting an inordinate amount of pressure on the UNODC. Let us hope the UNODC, a global organisation that is part of the UN and supposed to do what is right for the people of the world, does not do a remarkable volte-face at the last possible moment and bow to pressure by not going ahead with this important move. The war on drugs has done too much damage to too many people already.
From his site: http://www.virgin.com/richard-branson/finally-a-change-in-course-on-drug-policy
SamKnause
(13,091 posts)Oh wait.
They did share their information with the U.S.
Guess what ???
Our government ignored it.
It seems BOTH parties love to deny FACTS and DATA.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Given the rhohypnol history of date rape, I have no desire to be drugged against my will by any kind of substance.
The only way to prevent that would be dispensaries where any drug must be consumed on site by people that qualify for the drug, screening out pregnant women, for example. The added advantage is the prompt medical assistance for anyone who has a bad reaction.
Too many people just don't think things through. There are reasons to put restrictions on drugs.
I also have no desire to hire a drug addict to do anything, from parking a car to washing floors to handling information. I don't want my life or my children's lives destroyed by someone whose own life is out of control, and whose mind is in chemical handcuffs.
Kurska
(5,739 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)They already decriminalized all drugs.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)does not protect anyone from nefarious persons so that's a specious argument. It is also specious to shift discussion of decriminalizing possession into talk of drug addicts.
Another example, many things that are safe for most people are not good for pregnant women, many prescription drugs have warnings to those who are or who might become pregnant. Those medications are not given out by guards in clinics.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)The only difference would be that they wouldn't be getting put in real handcuffs.
Stryst
(714 posts)There are already plenty of legal drugs that make that possible. Thorazine is popular in prison, for example. And pregnant women who want to get high already are. You don't want to hire a drug addict? You probably already work with drug addicts and don't know it.
Don't let your unreasonable fears prevent the rest of us from moving forward.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Decriminalizing narcotics does not mean it is legal to drug someone. What you are actually saying is that your fear of date rape trumps the right to liberty of countless persons of color caught up by the racist policies of the drug war.
As an employer, you don't have to hire a drug addict.
Your stance on this issue is inhumane.
jhart3333
(332 posts)You speak for me clearly and succinctly.
pinstikfartherin
(500 posts)While you're thinking of the typical stereotypical addict who is a mess, there are plenty of addicts who juggle their addiction with work and family and keep it hidden. There are also plenty of people who aren't anything near addicts who would date rape. You can still get these drugs even though they are criminalized, and decriminalizing does not make rape illegal.
Addiction is way more complicated than you're making it.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)Alcohol prohibition did not work; nor is the 'War on Drugs' working. Regulation, rational & compassionate approaches are what we need now; we tried to criminalize drugs and IT DID NOT WORK.
jalan48
(13,859 posts)The writer William Burroughs, a drug addict himself, said this over 50 years ago. It's like criminalizing mental illness, drug addiction is a health concern, not a criminal one. This isn't to say all drug addiction will be eradicated, but it will be easier to treat.
Thank you.
Duval
(4,280 posts)people in jails for possessing weed, even without intent to sell. And then they'll have felony charges on their records and in some states, will not be allowed to vote.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)fear of legalizing all drugs comes from experience - first the mother of my great grandchildren is not a good mother because she puts her drug use way before anything the children need. My daughter now has custody of the children and they are safe - no fear that my beautiful little 10 year old great granddaughter will be pimped for drugs anymore. They are fed regularly have a safe home and go to school regularly. They are loved.
Secondly I know a young man with a family who has HepC and is in danger of dying. Are we just going to let people kill themselves with dangerous medications? And at this point most of our drug treatment programs are ineffective. How are we going to deal with this?
Having said that I think that drug use needs to be treated as an illness not a crime. No jail for an illness.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,307 posts)Richard Branson has been involved in a bruising clash with the United Nations following his claim that the organisation is poised to endorse a global policy of decriminalising drugs.
...
Within hours of his claim, however, UNODC made it clear that no such change in policy was imminent and said it regretted an unfortunate misunderstanding over the nature of a two-page briefing paper written by one of its senior officials. The paper by its head of HIV/Aids was scheduled to be delivered at a international harm reduction conference in Malaysia.
The briefing paper on decriminalisation mentioned in many of todays media reports, and intended for dissemination and discussion at a conference in Kuala Lumpur, is neither a final nor formal document and cannot be read as a statement of UNODC policy, a spokesperson said.
It remains under review and UNODC regrets that, on this occasion, there has been an unfortunate misunderstanding about the nature and intent of this briefing paper. UNODC emphatically denies reports that there has been pressure on UNODC to withdraw the document. But it is not possible to withdraw what is not yet ready.
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/oct/19/un-call-decriminalisation-drugs-richard-branson
An attempt by UN officials to get countries to decriminalise the possession and use of all drugs has been foiled, the BBC can reveal.
A paper from the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) has been withdrawn after pressure from at least one country.
...
The document was drawn up by Dr Monica Beg, chief of the HIV/AIDs section of the UNODC in Vienna. It was prepared for an international harm reduction conference currently being held in Kuala Lumpur.
...
Sources within the UNODC have told the BBC the document was never sanctioned by the organisation as policy. One senior figure within the agency described Dr Beg as "a middle-ranking official" who was offering a professional viewpoint.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34571609