Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 11:50 PM Oct 2015

U.S. approves $11.25 billion warship sale to Saudi Arabia

Source: Reuters

The U.S. government said on Tuesday it has approved the sale of up to four Lockheed Martin Corp multi-mission warships, plus associated equipment, training and logistics to Saudi Arabia, a deal valued at $11.25 billion overall.

The Pentagon's Defense Security Cooperation Agency, which oversees foreign military sales, notified U.S. lawmakers late Monday about the possible sale, and released a statement on its website on Tuesday.

"We stand ready to support that sale," Lockheed Chief Executive Officer Marillyn Hewson told analysts on an earnings call. She said the deal could be completed in 2016.

DSCA said the major defense equipment involved in the deal was worth $4.3 billion, with the rest going to fund extensive engineering, logistics and training required for the program.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/20/us-lockheed-saudi-warships-idUSKCN0SE1FD20151020

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. approves $11.25 billion warship sale to Saudi Arabia (Original Post) IDemo Oct 2015 OP
Damn, we never learn. nt Live and Learn Oct 2015 #1
Ok, what exactly is wrong with this in your opinion? cstanleytech Oct 2015 #3
Saudia Arabia should not be armed by us at all. Period! nt Live and Learn Oct 2015 #4
Why? Because they are an oppressive government or because you think they are a threat? cstanleytech Oct 2015 #5
Both. Why do you think they should be? nt Live and Learn Oct 2015 #6
Why do I think they should be what? cstanleytech Oct 2015 #7
Sold warships or armed by us. nt Live and Learn Oct 2015 #8
In this case because the ship are lightly armed and the saudi navy plays a dual role in the region cstanleytech Oct 2015 #9
Not buying it. No country with the human rights violations of Saudia Arabia should Live and Learn Oct 2015 #10
Hey I am saying they are perfect, alot of countries we deal arent like China, India and the list is cstanleytech Oct 2015 #13
Hmmm, I am sure I don't have to remind you that Bin Laden came from Saudi Arabia. Live and Learn Oct 2015 #16
And Timothy McVeigh came from Lockport, New York and but dont think cstanleytech Oct 2015 #18
I'm sorry, was this about boycotting? I thought it was about selling warships? Live and Learn Oct 2015 #19
terry nichols was apprehended in my Aunt's restaurant reddread Oct 2015 #40
Put it this way..... Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2015 #11
Which zero do with providing them some moderately armed ships have dual purpose of also helping to cstanleytech Oct 2015 #14
They could use them for royal yachts too but I doubt it. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2015 #17
after 9-11-01 you can ask that? reddread Oct 2015 #22
Do you really think its wise to go down the road of blaming an entire country for the actions of a cstanleytech Oct 2015 #33
I wont be looking to you for wisdom reddread Oct 2015 #35
Ha, I didnt say say you had to you can believe what the hell you want to believe. cstanleytech Oct 2015 #36
and you can be soft on REAL terrorism if you like reddread Oct 2015 #37
Nice little soundbite, heard it often during the Bush years and I didnt believe it then cstanleytech Oct 2015 #38
with the aid and assistance of their friends in reddread Oct 2015 #39
Masters of War hibbing Oct 2015 #2
Wanna bet this will be called "foreign aid"? Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2015 #12
A giant part of which will be laundered into "campaign contributions." PSPS Oct 2015 #15
The LCS scores its first military victory against Saudi Arabia OakCliffDem Oct 2015 #20
The sale isn't about Saudi Arabia. It's about the U.S. government and the defense industry. no_hypocrisy Oct 2015 #21
Because arming the REAL Caliphate always turns out well? /sarcasm n/t uawchild Oct 2015 #23
Hey, maybe they can turn them over to ISIL n2doc Oct 2015 #24
That's going to end up a very expensive decoration for the bottom of the Persian Gulf. frizzled Oct 2015 #25
we are the evil empire olddots Oct 2015 #26
They can christen it the Osama Bin Laden tabasco Oct 2015 #27
They don't call him "Lockheed Carter" for nothing. TwilightGardener Oct 2015 #28
They will need those ships because Russia & China intend to 'control' Assads sea port. Sunlei Oct 2015 #29
FYI: Saudi Arabia does not share a shoreline with Syria. uawchild Oct 2015 #30
Syrias' Shipping Port (countries only port) on the Mediterranean Sea. Sunlei Oct 2015 #32
once again, arming the ME states with the only US product people overseas want wordpix Oct 2015 #31
wordpix, these are small ships these are not nuclear powered carriers. nt cstanleytech Oct 2015 #34

cstanleytech

(26,284 posts)
3. Ok, what exactly is wrong with this in your opinion?
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 12:58 AM
Oct 2015

Considering the size and armament of these ships offhand they dont seem powerful enough to shift the balance of power in the region much if at all.

cstanleytech

(26,284 posts)
9. In this case because the ship are lightly armed and the saudi navy plays a dual role in the region
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 01:38 AM
Oct 2015

and patrols for pirates and also assists with search and rescue in the region and these ships are perfect for that as they have a landing pad for helicopters.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
10. Not buying it. No country with the human rights violations of Saudia Arabia should
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 01:42 AM
Oct 2015

receive any armaments from the US. In fact, we should have nothing to do with them unless it is aid for those that they have disenfranchised. How can you trust anyone that treats their people so shabbily?

cstanleytech

(26,284 posts)
13. Hey I am saying they are perfect, alot of countries we deal arent like China, India and the list is
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 01:49 AM
Oct 2015

huge.
Its just not practical to pick and choose on who we want to deal with as far as trade and forming allies in a region and the fact is right now the Saudis are the most stable ones in the region unless you want to arm Israel more which imo would be damn stupid to do.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
16. Hmmm, I am sure I don't have to remind you that Bin Laden came from Saudi Arabia.
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 01:54 AM
Oct 2015

We don't have a very good reputation for whom we choose to arm in the ME. Perhaps it is time we admit it and stop.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
19. I'm sorry, was this about boycotting? I thought it was about selling warships?
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 02:34 AM
Oct 2015

That said, I don't think we should sell warships to Lockport. I am nothing if not consistent,

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
11. Put it this way.....
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 01:43 AM
Oct 2015

Say you are a prisoner waiting your turn to be flogged for something stupid that's not even a crime in most parts of the world and you look down at your shackles and see "Made In The USA".

Way to spread the love.

cstanleytech

(26,284 posts)
14. Which zero do with providing them some moderately armed ships have dual purpose of also helping to
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 01:51 AM
Oct 2015

provide search and rescue.

cstanleytech

(26,284 posts)
33. Do you really think its wise to go down the road of blaming an entire country for the actions of a
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 05:58 PM
Oct 2015

a small % of their total population?

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
37. and you can be soft on REAL terrorism if you like
Thu Oct 22, 2015, 08:55 AM
Oct 2015

but I have to say (not just as a victim) that is despicable.

cstanleytech

(26,284 posts)
38. Nice little soundbite, heard it often during the Bush years and I didnt believe it then
Thu Oct 22, 2015, 09:37 AM
Oct 2015

when they used it to get so many bad laws and bills passed.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
39. with the aid and assistance of their friends in
Thu Oct 22, 2015, 09:50 AM
Oct 2015

SAUDI ARABIA!

see how that works?
thinking it through is much better than not thinking.
best of luck.

OakCliffDem

(1,274 posts)
20. The LCS scores its first military victory against Saudi Arabia
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 05:39 AM
Oct 2015

The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS), or as it is known to its detractors as the Littoral Container Ship, may have a few uses, but Naval Power is not one of them. It has an atrocious development history fraught with cost overruns, conflicts with Law of the Sea, and raw politics in the contracting process. It is overloaded, gold plated, and has specifications that do not match the reality of its construction. When it comes to military procurement, the LCS is definitely in the lower quartile.

The sale to Saudi Arabia is a blatant case of spreading the pain around by getting another ally to kick in some money to pay for this turkey. The Saudis are being sold a bill of goods knowing full well they will never be able to put it to use. This will be a cash cow for Lockheed because the Saudis have a track record of not being able to maintain complex hardware and solving the problem by contracting maintenance back to the suppliers. The ships will be welded to the pier and will see a yearly cruise to carry the Royal Family out for a ride down the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden.

no_hypocrisy

(46,086 posts)
21. The sale isn't about Saudi Arabia. It's about the U.S. government and the defense industry.
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 06:21 AM
Oct 2015

1. Theory is that if SA doesn't buy war toys from the U.S., they will buy them from another country.
2. Like Israel (unlikely) or Russia (more likely).
3. Russia would not only reap the profits from such a sale, but would gain political influence in SA and the region.
4. Leading other regional countries to buy from Russia, not the U.S.
5. At this time, our GDP depends upon selling war equipment to other countries.

uawchild

(2,208 posts)
30. FYI: Saudi Arabia does not share a shoreline with Syria.
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 01:05 PM
Oct 2015

In fact, not only does Saudi Arabia NOT share a shoreline with Syria, they don't share a land border either

Here's a map:

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
32. Syrias' Shipping Port (countries only port) on the Mediterranean Sea.
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 01:43 PM
Oct 2015

edited to add. There is a water connection between the Black Sea & the Mediterranean sea. It's ever changing but it is there. Sea Ports seem very important recently to Putin. He grabbed Crimea for the Sea Port. IMO, Putins main interest is control of Syrias Seaport (along with China for some reason)

Here's more information about the Black Sea and how it connects to the Mediterranean.

In the past, the water level has varied significantly. Due to these variations in the water level in the basin, the surrounding shelf and associated aprons have sometimes been land. At certain critical water levels it is possible for connections with surrounding water bodies to become established. It is through the most active of these connective routes, the Turkish Straits, that the Black Sea joins the world ocean. When this hydrological link is not present, the Black Sea is an endorheic basin, operating independently of the global ocean system, like the Caspian Sea for example. Currently the Black Sea water level is relatively high, thus water is being exchanged with the Mediterranean. The Turkish Straits connect the Black Sea with the Aegean Sea, and comprise the Bosphorus, the Sea of Marmara and the Dardanelles. more

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
31. once again, arming the ME states with the only US product people overseas want
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 01:28 PM
Oct 2015

sigh. We give billion$ in armaments to Qatar, which then sends millions to Hamas. Ditto Turkey et al.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. approves $11.25 bill...