Bill Clinton Rallies Superdelegates as Hillary's Campaign Hints at Growing Roster
Source: Bloomberg.com
Bill Clinton Rallies Superdelegates as Hillary's Campaign Hints at Growing Roster
The Democratic front-runner's campaign says it has now secured the commitment of over 500 superdelegates.
October 28, 2015 3:12 PM CDT
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has extended her already sizable superdelegate lead by several dozen since August, and is deploying former President Bill Clinton to bring more of the powerful endorsers on board.
Based on a memo from campaign manager Robby Mook and delegate figures provided by the Democratic National Committee, Bloomberg Politics estimates Hillary Clinton has well over 500 superdelegate commitments, putting her even closer to securing the minimum number needed to win the party's nomination before ordinary voters cast a single ballot in a caucus or primary.
Today, Hillary has more support from superdelegates than all the pledged delegates awarded in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina, and a third of delegates awarded on Super Tuesday combined, Mook said in the memo, which was sent to supporters on Tuesday and obtained by Bloomberg. (Politico reported on the memo earlier Wednesday.)
In late August, Democratic sources told Bloomberg Politics that she had won private and public commitments from more than 440 super delegates....................
Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-10-28/bill-clinton-rallies-superdelegates-as-hillary-s-campaign-hints-at-growing-roster
?w=620&q=85&auto=format&sharp=10&s=2314eee3da6894934d0eb8a3783dc2cc
Im tu Hillary: Clinton at the Latinos for Hillary grassroots event in San Antonio, Texas. Photograph: Erich Schlegel/Getty Images
Gothmog
(145,124 posts)Hillary will have a decent lead before Iowa and New Hampshire
postulater
(5,075 posts)murielm99
(30,733 posts)if Bernie is not the nominee, I will not vote?
This is childish. It is also why I am sure that many of the people who have come here recently are not Democrats. They are here only to disrupt and cast doubt. Not voting is the same as voting for a Republican.
Superdelegates are part of the party's nomination process. They are not involved in the general election. My issue is that our primary process seems broken. Superdelegate's votes seem to count more than mine since my state is very late in the nations primary process.
Regardless of who I vote for in the primary, it may make no difference in the nomination process. That seems wrong. It doesn't seem like democracy.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)It burns me that my state - which is a state that actually fucking matters - is an afterthought in the primary process.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)Their views literally shape the platform at the Democratic National Convention. You should always vote for your preferred candidate so that their delegates are at the Convention and can shape the platform.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)That a candidate could secure the nomination based on them alone is a travesty.
frylock
(34,825 posts)She may win the primary with them, but at the risk of disenfranchising an entire generation of new voters.
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)Because no one cares about that. The only way it's an issue is if one candidate wins the elected delegates and another wins the super delegates. But I don't expect that to happen. In 2008, many flipped to support Obama.
Gman
(24,780 posts)Fortunately. So who cares?
frylock
(34,825 posts)We know you don't care.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)and therefore, more pledged delegates. It won't be like 2008 when neither Obama nor Hillary had enough pledged delegates to win the nomination outright and the votes of the super delegates mattered.
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)They are around 15% of the delegates. But dominating with them helps.
4007 Delegates
713 Super Delegates
4720 Total
*2361 needed to win
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Last edited Wed Oct 28, 2015, 08:37 PM - Edit history (1)
The article makes it sound like you can win only with them.
Specifically this:
Hillary Clinton has well over 500 superdelegate commitments, putting her even closer to securing the minimum number needed to win the party's nomination before ordinary voters cast a single ballot in a caucus or primary.
ToxMarz
(2,166 posts)With those numbers there is no reason to word it that way, unless you want to cause some discord with that whole 'coronation' suggestion.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)So a candidate cannot secure the nomination based on them alone.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)he has made sure this time she will win no matter what. Some have said the fix is in. I tend to think so. If the Superdelegates make the choice and not the people then this system is corrupt. The popular vote also is a must but that is ignored. People should always win by voters not a rigged system.
frylock
(34,825 posts)that the system is fucked. Look for the lowest voter turnout in Presidential election history.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)Mark Grable
(23 posts)Jeb, or Bernie?
BTW, that's a badass mule!
Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)marble falls
(57,075 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,232 posts)redwitch
(14,944 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)You should stay home.
redwitch
(14,944 posts)I always vote.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I like to pretend that voting one's convictions is in vain, too... as it allows a much more convenient justification when we slowly embrace the cowardice of inaction and suggesting others staying home.
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)As far as I can tell there are 4720 total delegates. If Hillary has 500+ locked up, she already has 10% of the vote locked up. Sanders would need to win the rest of the superdelegates and win every state with a 10 point margin. Neither of those things are going to happen.
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P16/D-Alloc.phtml
oberliner
(58,724 posts)If Bernie starts winning primary after primary, they can switch over to him if they want to.
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)That happened with Obama in 2008. But Hillary didn't have nearly as many pledged in 2008.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)I believe if she already won you will see a firestorm of voters for Bernie letting the establishment know that this system is pathetic and unfair. Voters should decide both the primary and the GE.
Mark Grable
(23 posts)Hillary vs. Jeb.
May be.
Maybe not. SD's could change their vote. In the next 3 months, Bernie could convince a majority of Democratic Primary Voters to vote for his policies.
Bernie vs. Jeb?
Bernie vs. the Donald?
Might be something to think about, because while lots of reasonable Vermont Republicans have voted repeatedly for Bernie, for 20 years, no Republicans anywhere will vote for Hillary anyhow.
Young peoples votes count, and since they will be dealing with the results of this, they are willing to listen to someone new. Check his record, check his funding, and don't be discouraged by schlock. Not all politics is slimy, just most of it.
OakCliffDem
(1,274 posts)Why do we even have primaries?
It looks like the Democratic National Committee is simply telling us who we are going to vote for.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)no matter what the campaign says about having them in the pocket or in the bag or whatever term they want to use. If the supers even dream of stealing the nomination and giving it to Hillary if Bernie ends up with the votes, you'll basically see a third-party born right there at the convention.it's hype designed to discourage people from voting against the "inevitable."
don't fall for it.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)Sorry, no.
CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)You had my vote!
DCBob
(24,689 posts)I dont think it matters anyway... she will win enough with just the popular vote easily.
William769
(55,144 posts)kjackson227
(2,166 posts)She and her camp also "CLAIMED" that she had the delegates just about wrapped up in 2008, and we know how that turned out. #feelthebern!
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)this is another mind trick to discourage people from voting by trying to convince them that candidate inevitable has the nomination all wrapped up. Don't fall for it. If the supers even attempt a coup and try to take the nomination away from Bernie if he ends up with the regular delegate votes, you will watch the party implode in real time during the convention.
Clinton will not get the votes of regular voters, the numbers are against her, the trends are against her, and the millennial's are going for Bernie in huge numbers, as well as people who have never voted before. Hillary will not be the nominee unless she tries to steal the nomination through the superdelegates, and that will not be allowed to happen. It's also just another symptom of our perverted, corrupt, and broken political system. more slimy Clintonian tactics to discourage real people from voting and choosing their leaders because if people come out and vote, she is toast just like in 08. it's a discouragement tactic. Don't fall for it.