US Officials: Troops To Only Fight ISIS, Russia Risks Fueling Syrian Quagmire
Source: Guardian UK
Secretary of State John Kerry said on Saturday American special operations troops being sent to Syria would only fight Islamic State militants and would not become involved in the countrys long-running civil war. As he did so, US-backed rebels attacked Isis in the north-east of the country.
Deputy secretary of state Antony Blinken, meanwhile, told a policy conference in Bahrain Moscows intervention in the Syrian conflict would have the unintended consequences of drawing Russia into a quagmire and alienating Sunni Muslims across the region.
Russia began airstrikes a month ago, changing the balance of forces in the war in favour of President Bashar al-Assad and against rebel groups that include both jihadists and non-militants backed by the West, Turkey and Gulf countries.
In Syria, a newly formed US-backed rebel alliance launched an offensive against Isis in the north-eastern province of Hasaka. It was the first declared operation by the Democratic Forces of Syria, which joins a US-backed Kurdish militia and several Syrian Arab rebel groups, since it announced its formation earlier this month.
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/31/john-kerry-us-troops-fight-isis-not-civil-war
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)fuck.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Response to enlightenment (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)doc03
(35,325 posts)it has got to happen. Then what?
uawchild
(2,208 posts)As does Russia, apparently. Russia's "plan B" if it starts losing a conventional fight that they deem an existential threat is to use tactical nuclear weapons.
"Insight - Russia's nuclear strategy raises concerns in NATO
Concern is growing in NATO over Russia's nuclear strategy and indications that Russian military planners may be lowering the threshold for using nuclear weapons in any conflict, alliance diplomats say."
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/02/04/uk-ukraine-crisis-russia-nuclear-insight-idUKKBN0L825A20150204
Russia has more deployed tactical nuclear weapons than the US and NATO and see them as their ultimate deterrent against NATO's conventional weapons superiority.
.
https://books.google.com/books?id=zd8cAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA158&lpg=PA158&dq=number+of+Russian+tactical+nuclear+weapons&source=bl&ots=moXKSmrLXy&sig=F__SkHgHcmspkAUh4gzCZnBZOoc&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCgQ6AEwAzgeahUKEwjdl9D7r-3IAhXLox4KHfCUBbc#v=onepage&q=number%20of%20Russian%20tactical%20nuclear%20weapons&f=false
louis-t
(23,292 posts)Giggety goo.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)cprise
(8,445 posts)Francois9
(54 posts)She expressed it with great clarity. And she handled Blitzer's tough question about Assad's alleged atrocities perfectly, by comparing them to Saddam's and Kadhafi's alleged atrocities, which were (a) probably exaggerated, and (b) not as bad as what happens when the US moves in with overwhelming firepower.
cprise
(8,445 posts)re: "not attacking Syrian government"
daleo
(21,317 posts)As she says, it is a simple concept.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)of congress not gung-ho to start WWIII.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Good for her for having the guts to speak out!
doc03
(35,325 posts)Sara Palin. We don't have to worry we can trust old Puty Put.
OldHippieChick
(2,434 posts)downing the Russian jetliner. They have poked the bear. This could ensure the Russians go after ISIS better than anything we might do. Very stupid on the part of ISIS.
Response to Purveyor (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed