For example on Syria and its chemical weapons program:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_2235
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_2118
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_2209
Many country-specific resolutions have been passed in response to natural disasters and other humanitarian crises.
Don't know where you got the idea the UN never passed a resolution on "a country" - maybe you watch too much Fox News or other propaganda sources.
The Iran nuclear deal is not legally binding, so it's completely justifiable to restrict Iran's missiles.
And there have long been restrictions on how countries may defend themselves - there have been restrictions on missiles themselves, as well as restrictions on the warheads they might carry, including chemical and biological weapons.
Some current restrictions on missiles in other countries are in the HCOC and MTCR:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missile_Technology_Control_Regime
Missile Technology Control Regime
The Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) is an informal and voluntary partnership between 34 countries to prevent the proliferation of missile and unmanned aerial vehicle technology capable of carrying a 500 kg payload for at least 300 km.
<snip>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Code_of_Conduct_against_Ballistic_Missile_Proliferation
International Code of Conduct against Ballistic Missile Proliferation
The Hague Code of Conduct against Ballistic Missile Proliferation (HCOC), was established on 25 November 2002 as an arrangement to prevent the proliferation of ballistic missiles.
<snip>
Since the signing and entering into force of the HCOC Code in November 2002 in The Hague, (Netherlands) the number of signatories has increased from 96 to 134 (132 UN members, the Cook Islands and the Holy See).[1]
<snip>
The ABM Treaty was in force for thirty years, it restricted missiles that could shoot down missiles:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Ballistic_Missile_Treaty
The Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM Treaty or ABMT) was a treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union on the limitation of the anti-ballistic missile (ABM) systems used in defending areas against ballistic missile-delivered nuclear weapons. Under the terms of the treaty, each party was limited to two ABM complexes, each of which was to be limited to 100 anti-ballistic missiles.[1]
Signed in 1972, it was in force for the next 30 years.[2] Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, in 1997 the United States and four former Soviet republics agreed to succeed to the treaty. In June 2002 the United States withdrew from the treaty, leading to its termination.
<snip>
Background
Throughout the late 1950s and into the 1960s, the United States and the Soviet Union had been developing missile systems with the ability to shoot down incoming ICBM warheads. During this period, the US considered the defense of the US as part of reducing the overall damage inflicted in a full nuclear exchange. As part of this defense, Canada and the US established the North American Air Defense Command (now called North American Aerospace Defense Command).
By the early 1950s, US research on the Nike Zeus missile system had developed to the point where small improvements would allow it to be used as the basis of an operational ABM system. Work started on a short-range, high-speed counterpart known as Sprint to provide defense for the ABM sites themselves. By the mid-1960s, both systems showed enough promise to start development of base selection for a limited ABM system dubbed Sentinel. In 1967, the US announced that Sentinel itself would be scaled down to the smaller and less expensive Safeguard. Soviet doctrine called for development of its own ABM system and return to strategic parity with the US. This was achieved with the operational deployment of the A-35 ABM system and its successors, which remain operational to this day.
<snip>
= new reply since forum marked as read
