Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,556 posts)
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:35 PM Jan 2016

Department of Labor sends warning shot to clients of temp staffing agencies

Source: W Post

By Lydia DePillis

The Department of Labor thinks more companies should take responsibility for their contracted workforces, and it’s just told them exactly how and when.

If there’s one trend that’s characterized the changing American workforce more than any other in recent decades, it’s been the fracturing of the employment relationship, as companies focus on their “core competencies” and pay other businesses to do everything else.

Subcontracting, outsourcing, and the use of staffing agencies allows businesses to inexpensively scale up and scale down their labor needs, without the extra hassle and liability of adding payroll. But it also adds another layer between workers and the bosses who call the shots, shielding managers from responsibility when the labor provider doesn’t follow the law.

Department of Labor’ Wage and Hour Division director David Weil, a former business school professor, calls this trend “fissuring.” He thinks lots of those client companies should really be considered “joint employers,” together with the contractors that sign the checks, making them liable for violations. And Wednesday, his department issued detailed guidance drawing the categories in black and white, sending a message to employers that they had better fall on the right side.

FULL story at link.


Job seekers DeAnn Morneau, from left, Keith Welsh and Crystal Griffin fill out applications for temporary or temp-to-hire positions during a 2011 job fair. (Ariana Lindquist/Bloomberg)

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/01/20/department-of-labor-sends-warning-shot-to-clients-of-temp-staffing-agencies/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Department of Labor sends warning shot to clients of temp staffing agencies (Original Post) Omaha Steve Jan 2016 OP
In IT it seems like every position these days is either contract or contract-to-hire. drm604 Jan 2016 #1
Yep. Phlem Jan 2016 #4
From the DOL blog: Are You a Joint Employer? mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2016 #2
Recommend! KoKo Jan 2016 #3
And it has been coming to aviation industry in a big way....................... turbinetree Jan 2016 #5
As a manager I've recently been solicited by a company that turns permanent to temp lostnfound Jan 2016 #6

drm604

(16,230 posts)
1. In IT it seems like every position these days is either contract or contract-to-hire.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:39 PM
Jan 2016

Companies seem to not want to actually hire people.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
4. Yep.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 02:57 PM
Jan 2016

Or you do work full time salaried and work 80 hours a week for a 40 hour week paycheck.

White collar slavery, alive and thriving in the good ole USA!

Woo Hoo!

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,359 posts)
2. From the DOL blog: Are You a Joint Employer?
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:42 PM
Jan 2016
Are You a Joint Employer?

Filed in DOL, Wage Enforcement By David Weil on January 20, 2016

Protecting workers in fissured workplaces – where there is increasingly the possibility that more than one employer is benefiting from their work – has been a major focus for the Wage and Hour Division in recent years. The Wage and Hour Division has always examined employment relationships during its investigations into possible wage and other labor violations, and the agency considers joint employment in hundreds of investigations every year.

While we devote significant resources to enforcing labor standards in order to protect the rights of workers, we also have a commitment to engage with and educate employers so they know about their responsibilities and can operate in compliance with the laws that we are tasked to uphold. That’s why today – consistent with that commitment – we’ve issued guidance on joint employment in the form of an administrator’s interpretation.

What is joint employment?

In a nutshell, joint employment exists when a person is employed by two or more employers such that the employers are responsible, both individually and jointly, for compliance with a statute.

The Fair Labor Standards Act and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act share the same definition of employment. This definition, which includes “to suffer or permit to work,” was written to have as broad an application as possible. Under these laws, it is possible for a worker to be jointly employed by two or more employers who are both responsible, simultaneously, for compliance. It is a longstanding principle under both the FLSA and MSPA that an employee can have two or more employers for the work that he or she is performing.

turbinetree

(24,688 posts)
5. And it has been coming to aviation industry in a big way.......................
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 03:22 PM
Jan 2016

just got the contract from a airline that merged with another airline six years ago last week, one had planes crash into the World Trade Center and Pennsylvania, and "it's the last and best offer" for the aircraft technician.

And if your on furlough, your out, see ya----- bye-bye, the new "improvements" have sold out the furloughed employees for a $9,000 signing bonus and if your topped out in pay you get a $22,000 in pay increase for the life of the contract, until they negotiate another contract ------------talk about loyalty---------------nope---------- its gone, that $9,000 just sold the furloughed and those on recall for over ten years, under the proverbial bus, through no fault of there own,----------think 9/11.

Plus, they were hiring people while people with seniority were on the list waiting for recall, they used another contract while in negotiations to hire people off the street at a lower costs and benefits------------------in my opinion the union should have said that is a strike issue-------------------period--------------------nope----------they did not.

And then they have this cover letter-------------------------------bunch of sell out of principles

lostnfound

(16,169 posts)
6. As a manager I've recently been solicited by a company that turns permanent to temp
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:55 PM
Jan 2016

It's their business model. Heavy sales pitch, follow up, coffee or lunch, wants to drop by to give me a "thank you gift" just for meeting with her.
I asked a bunch of socially conscious questions about how much their temps get paid compare to what portion goes to the temp placement agency, and started a discussion about an economy based on disposable workers.
Not that it would do any good, this person was just a sales person, maybe a temp herself, who knows, or working on commission.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Department of Labor sends...