Rome's nude statues covered to spare Rouhani's blushes
Source: The Local - Italy's News in English
Hassan Rouhani visited the Capitoline Museums with premier Matteo Renzi, having signed contracts worth up to 17 billion ($18.4 billion) on Monday.
And Renzi was clearly keen to avoid offending his new business partner. The nude statues and sculptures in the museum were completely covered by large white boxes, as can be seen in the video below.
The decision to cover up nudity was seen as a mark of respect for the traditions of the Muslim country, which has only just had its trade sanctions lifted.
Read more: http://www.thelocal.it/20160126/nude-statues-covered-up-for-rouhanis-visit
Shouldn't the Iranian leader be showing respect to Italian traditions, not the other way around? If the Italian leader went to Iran, would they allow the same freedoms expected in Italy in respect for Italian traditions? I very much doubt it.
geardaddy
(24,926 posts)The Italians shouldn't be covering up their national treasures for the sake of Rouhani.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)No one need to "show respect for the traditions of a Muslim country" when in your own country.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)What the hell is happening with Europe?
840high
(17,196 posts)MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)christx30
(6,241 posts)we are called imperialistic and racist. We must bend to them in all things. We respect their culture. They respect nothing.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Otherwise, who is "we"?
EllieBC
(3,014 posts)And it's true. We are becoming cowardly. Covering statues so as not to offend someone's backwards views.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)when someone in this country covers up statues or paintings in order to satisfy the whims of a religious fanatic who is here VISITING. Until then, nobody but the Italians are cowards.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)WASHINGTON (AP) No longer will the attorney general be photographed in front of two partially nude statues in the Great Hall of the Department of Justice.
The department spent $8,000 on blue drapes that hide the two giant, aluminum art deco statues, said spokesman Shane Hix. For aesthetic reasons, he said, the drapes were occasionally hung in front of the statues before formal events. The department used to rent the drapes, but has now purchased them and left them hanging.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1788845.stm
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Some schmuck in the Department of Justice did it to appease their boss. WE universally mocked and were disgusted by that. Hardly the same thing at all except to those who are aching to find excuses for this crap.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Funny how that works.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)assuming the first person we responded to was calling all western culture cowards. But really, do let me know when we let a VISITOR decide what's obscene or not.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Those are your words.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)that's at fault. I was clearly talking about the Italians that caved to the religious freaks (and being religious freaks themselves - being the Vatican and all - that's really saying something). If you want to interpret that as all Italians, knock yourself out - I couldn't possibly care less.
Whatever.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)Since thats their tradition in Italy.
I wonder what other Muslim traditions we know of that the Italians would honor?
MowCowWhoHow III
(2,103 posts)LittleGirl
(8,285 posts)And this is why I will never visit a country that cannot display ancient art, nude or not. F* that.
What the hell was Italy thinking?
thereismore
(13,326 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)why did he visit the Capitoline Museums? Arrogantly demanding concessions to cultural sensibility, while failing to reciprocate, is a defining flaw in all forms of fundamentalism. I like the French response to this sort of petty power display: "You are invited to dinner at my house. If what we serve offends you, feel free not to attend."
christx30
(6,241 posts)And the French got a lot of crap for that, some of it on this very board.
It's sickening.
dobleremolque
(491 posts)Be like French President Hollande who cancelled a dinner with Rouhani rather than accede to the Iranian request not to serve any wine at their table.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)with lust and start molesting all the women, statues or not. Kind of embarrassing to have to watch them hump a rock.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,339 posts)... I don't know the Arabic translation of "YeeHaw!", but ...
OnionPatch
(6,169 posts)Apparently men from his culture have absolutely no self control. They probably had to cover the statues to protect them more than anything.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Fucking religion...Get over this nonsense, world.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Just shit on all the people who love art and the human body. If this is the kind of bullshit Iran's leaders expect when they visit, it's my fervent hope they stay home.
Kablooie
(18,628 posts)No one should be kowtowing to Muslim preferences.
"When in Rome do as the Muslims do" is not a popular phrase.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)But do they ever reciprocate and try to show any kind of cultural sensitivity when the tables are turned? No, we still have to kowtow to their preferences.
July
(4,750 posts)Retrograde
(10,134 posts)iandhr
(6,852 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Welcome to the Plantation!
karynnj
(59,503 posts)Having been to the Islamic art section of NYC's MET, I think that there were nudes in Persian art.
They speak of France rejecting the idea that the meal honoring Rouhani be halal and not include wine. Yet, I assume that if an observant Jew who was the PM of Israel were honored, the meal would be kosher and if there were wine, it would be kosher too.
This is no different than the fact that if I had a dinner for someone who was vegetarian, it would be a vegetarian meal. Just part of being a good hostess.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)But it is poor manners to insist that your hosts have none either. I've yet to hear of an Israeli diplomat insisting everyon else observe kosher laws in a large catered gathering where they are the lone person who needs to.
If you had a wedding to cater for 60 guests including one vegetarian, would you deprive everyone else of meat? Particularly say in a meat-based dietary culture like Argentina? Trying to insist the French, of all people, should not have wine when they are hosting you is a bit of prime chutzpah, at the risk of offending a Muslim with that term.
OnlinePoker
(5,719 posts)karynnj
(59,503 posts)There is nothing offensive to me in NOT having meat.
christx30
(6,241 posts)My sister is a vegan. We invited her for our house for Christmas dinner. We had a vegan alternative for her, but the rest of us had turkey. We didn't demand that she eat turkey, nor did she demand that we all eat a vegan meal. Everyone had what we wanted, and there was no problems.
What the Iranians did back in November was the equivalent of my sister saying "If you want me there, then no one else can have turkey. You're all eating vegan this year."
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)Your logic is flawed or you are a hypocrite.
There is a difference between NOT serving something they typically drink and serving something that is against their religion. I love wine, but I actually do not feel deprived when I don't get it.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)But Iranians don't change their culture for anyone.
Got it. You are a hypocrite. Thought so.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)because it seems this was done by the Italians themselves who made their own assumptions not because the Iranians required it
christx30
(6,241 posts)in November in France, when they were planning a state dinner. The Iranians were demanding that no wine was to be served. The French told them to shove their demand.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)of their own volition not because the Iranians requested it
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)It's about kow-towing to silly religious sensitivities.
As an atheist, I disagree with any submission to ancient and silly religious rules that are the anti-thesis of liberal principles.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)Either way there is a reason to condemn the action. Iranians asked for it or the Italians did it on their own. Fuck that action.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Mama mia this dude could care less he probably subscribes to Penthouse.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Why not have a talented sculptor carve tasteful stone removable boxer shorts and bikini tops that could be placed on the statues for this kind of occasion?
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)Atty Gen Ashcroft had a drape put over Lady Justice - HAHAHAHA - dope!
Mosby
(16,304 posts)Obama Admin Covers Naked Lady Justice
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/368760/obama-admin-covers-naked-lady-justice-andrew-johnson
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)reading purview - although - on further review..no other news org picked up the story...once and done by nationalreview??...junk review to me! - I am neither right or left - I am a factualist...not a nonsense junker...
Mosby
(16,304 posts)So who knows.
Beowulf42
(204 posts)There should be women and men with their tops off lining every street Rouhani is driven down. Savonarola is dead. Let him rest.
displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)This was a stupid, stupid move for western society in general. We can be hospitable without covering our treasures with damned boxes.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Heck, they go to strip clubs. They're not above stripping them naked and raping them. They just don't want anyone looking at their fully-clothed women.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)Are also forbidden in Judaism.
Do Jews demand they be covered when, say, the Chief Rabbi of Israel came to visit?
(Of course not. Nor should they be. This is just to compare and contrast.)
bdwker
(435 posts)Italy kowtows against it own history.
England concedes to sharia courts and women are treated like garbage.
France is in the crosshairs of terrorism by its own immigrants .
Sweden has become rape central .
Germany invites in any raping male to enjoy its women.
Europe is in some serious trouble.