Mormons march in Gay Pride Parade to build bridges
Source: Salt Lake Tribune
Before the drag queens in heels danced across Main Street, more than 300 members of the LDS Church left Utah Gay Pride Parade spectators in tears Sunday morning. One Mormon father turned to the crowd and thanked people for forgiving him.
The group, Mormons Building Bridges, said they wanted to send a message of love to the states LGBT community, a message they believe is compatible with their faith.
Emily Vandyke, 50, carried a sign with the words from an LDS childrens song: "Ill walk with you, Ill talk with you. Thats how Ill show my love for you."
Several blocks along the parade route, she embraced a tall woman weeping at the edge of the crowd who said, "Thank you."
Read more: http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/54225023-78/parade-mormons-gay-pride.html.csp
It's not a monolithic church, with one viewpoint.
trumad
(41,692 posts)Viewpoint of douchebag Joseph Smith.
FreeState
(10,571 posts)Joseph Smith wouldn't recognize the current church at all. Joseph Smith taught that the sin of Sodom was rejecting the prophets, not homosexuality. While he was in charge black members were given the priesthood (Brigham Young changed that).
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)n/t.
FreeState
(10,571 posts)When the Mormons migrated to Missouri they encountered the pro-slavery sentiments of their neighbors. Joseph Smith, Jr. upheld the laws regarding slaves and slaveholders, but remained abolitionist in his actions and doctrines.
Following the death of Joseph Smith, Jr., Mormon leaders beginning with Brigham Young instituted a policy of excluding most people of black African descent (regardless of actual skin color) from Priesthood ordination and from participation in temple ceremonies. These practices continued in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) until the 1978 Revelation on Priesthood, which was canonized as Official Declaration2.
Brigham Young effectively, according to doctrine, was keeping blacks out of the highest kingdoms of heaven (to get there one must go through the temple.) Brigham Young changed the LDS Church drastically from what it was in its early days. RLDS (renamed Community of Christ in the 1990s) is much closer to what Joseph Smith started with (but it has been changed as well, however, its a much more liberal take on the LDS faith).
xfundy
(5,105 posts)They're pretending to care about us to get VOTES for their Bishop Elder Pope Rmoney.
frogmarch
(12,153 posts)Even after thinking about it, I still smell a rat.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)"Separate your opponent from their base."
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)The youth are leaving the LDS Church in large numbers....so are women...mothers of LGBT children. I was reading about that just last month. Also, there are many within the Mormon community who are worried that Romney will eventually damage the brand.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)especially if its to protect the image of the Mormon church.
I'm guessing there's going to be a lot of this by Mormons in order to get Mitt elected....
Fearless
(18,421 posts)truly believe in equality for all. Thank you to them for their participation.
justice1
(795 posts)agent46
(1,262 posts)The Mormons are a despicable cult but it's wonderful to see the humanity shine through even the most insidious mind control.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)A few members who disagree with official policy, who can be thrown out for that disagreement, and whose tithes are used to promote regressive policy do not constitute a culture of dissent. At best they're irrelevant and at worst they're quislings.
boppers
(16,588 posts)This is 300....
In the geographic heart of the church.
That's like 300 pro-choice Catholics marching through Vatican city.
Sure, it's not 300,000.
It's enough to turn the tide of a war, though.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)You really can't effectively demand change from an institution that's oppressing you at your own expense.
boppers
(16,588 posts)Does that mean you agree with everything the US government does in your name?
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Oh wait, that's a temple recommend interview.
Paying taxes for services is not the same as being voluntarily shaken down to fund a racist, homophobic, anti-woman hate group.
-p
boppers
(16,588 posts)You had a pervy Bishop?
Wait, let me guess, you're not actually LDS, and never had a temple recommend?
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)boppers
(16,588 posts)Are you conflating religions?
FreeState
(10,571 posts)After the mission no one asked - however we even had a whole fireside in the MTC on the evils of masterbation.
I however was never asked this once I was back from my mission. (and every missionary I know was asked this question, including all my brothers who went on different missions over a 20 year span).
Must be the catholic thing.
FreeState
(10,571 posts)No catholics in my family.
(I, along with everyone in my MTC branch that was male, was asked if we masterbated and if we had a problem with beastiality by our branch president in out PWI)
boppers
(16,588 posts)Sorry. Not because its my fault, but that's some serious WTF.
trickyguy
(769 posts)Sure, they'll walk and talk with us.
But they'll also help vote against us in California.
And consider us an abomination according to church doctrine.
I'd like to see some real strides before I buy any of their tears.
And yeah, I'm cynical about that group.
caseymoz
(5,763 posts)behind their church policies. And, yes, arguably, the possibility of having a Mormon Bishop as president will supersede orthodoxy.
boppers
(16,588 posts)You know how much formal teaching and study you need to become a Mormon "Bishop"?
Zero.
They do "lay clergy", a "Bishop" is a guy with time on his hands.
That's all it takes.
Your statement would be more correct as follows:
"And, yes, arguably, the possibility of having a Mormon as president will supersede orthodoxy."
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)ETA: My bad. A PRIEST is any male over age 13 in good standing. A bishop is the most domineering fascist of the local group.
boppers
(16,588 posts)Deacon->Teacher->Priest->Bishop->Elder->High Priest/Patriarch->Seventy->Apostle
No, a 13 year old is not a Priest. You have to be at least 16.
To be a "Priest".
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)caseymoz
(5,763 posts)Still, it sounds prestigious to people outside the Church. It will lend even more credibility to the Church if a Mormon Bishop becomes president. Therefore, making this happen is going to drive this church and it's members, more than a "moral" principle like homophobia. They'll revert to form after the election, except more so if they win.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I left the RCC to become an Episcopalian, because I was told I was going to burn in hell for being gay by a bishop.
Aristus
(66,327 posts)Then again, I'm straight. I don't blame anyone in the LGBT community for being a bit skeptical. Still, I was very moved...
msongs
(67,395 posts)boppers
(16,588 posts)It's all kind of bizarre.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)can expect the full weight of their local church hierarchy to come down on them.
I expect excommunication for some and perhaps all of them.
FreeState
(10,571 posts)Why so? I was an out gay man in the LDS Church for many years and was never threatened with excommunication (even while being the president of a student run gay group that was in the local media in Utah numerous times). The LDS Church rarely exs gay members anymore and its almost never for supporting gay rights.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)boppers
(16,588 posts)Can you point to the passage in the D&C where it says gays cannot be part of the church?
Do you even know what I'm talking about?
I'll wait.
K8-EEE
(15,667 posts)because of being gay -- he was surprised because he went to the "SSA reparative therapy" and kept coming back saying it didn't work. He truly thought that they could cure him, but they ended up X-ing him and he asked them "how can I be Xd for being gay when you told me there is no such thing as gay?"
boppers
(16,588 posts)Is the play available online?
K8-EEE
(15,667 posts)boppers
(16,588 posts)That's a bit more than excommunicated for just being gay.
Unless, of course, you assume *all* gay men leave spouses to become addicted rent boys.
Which would be... weird.
FreeState
(10,571 posts)This letter will confirm the decision made at a Church disciplinary council held in your behalf on July 16, 2000, in the Sandy Utah Canyon View Stake that you be excommunicated from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints for the practice of homosexuality. you should know that if you wish to appeal this decision that you may do so to the First Presidency through President Hunt.
Steven, we are most grateful that we had the opportunity to meet with you at this important meeting. Your honesty, openness, and the expression of your values and feelings were genuine and sincere. During that short time together we felt of your spirit and commend you for the devotion and dedication you have shown over your life to the Lord and His Church. We are saddened that your behavior has brought you to this point in your life.
Excommunication is the most severe Church disciplinary action. A person who is excommunicated is no longer a member of the Church. As such, you no longer have any privileges of Church membership. You may not wear temple garments or pay tithes and offerings. You may attend public Church meetings if your conduct is orderly, and we encourage you to do so. However, in such meetings you may not give a talk, offer a public prayer, partake of the sacrament, or participate in the sustaining of church officers.
This is very rate regardless. It could be an overzealous Bishop and Stake President, but regardless its hard to find this happening within the church in the last 20 or so years (this is one of maybe two cases I know of, and I know a lot of exmo gays).
Response to FreeState (Reply #39)
boppers This message was self-deleted by its author.
boppers
(16,588 posts)Law doesn't work the way most folks think it does.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)the Catholics wherein the higher ups are like the paranoid ones but the regular folks are ok?
Kali
(55,007 posts)but like all groups there are some good and bad and all in between
not my thing (any religion for that matter) but I live amongst them and some are good people, others are real assholes - just like everywhere.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)and could be thought of as liberal.
http://mormonsforobama.org/
and this article
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/05/04/pro-obama_mormons_unswayed_by_shared_faith_with_romney_114040.html
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)My guess is YES, so I have to say...I smell a rat in this new development.
FreeState
(10,571 posts)schnavelli
(2 posts)This is a wonderful wonderful step forward for humanity
Skinner
(63,645 posts)Welcome to DU, schnavelli.
bitchkitty
(7,349 posts)They want Rmoney in the White House. That's what this is about. Please don't anyone be fooled.
NuttyFluffers
(6,811 posts)you either support people or you support an institution. pick one. enough games.