NASA study shows worst drought in 900 years may be behind Middle East upheaval
Source: News Corp Australia Network
THE incredibly complex chaos of Islamic State and the upheavals of Syria and Iraq may have a very simple cause: The regions worst drought in 900 years.
A NASA study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres shows the Middle East is in the grip of a mega-drought that began in 1998. It has taken hold in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Turkey.
The water shortage has been taking a steadily increasing toll on farmers and the regions ecology, with crop failures, dust storms and record-breaking heat now an annual event.
...
The range of how extreme wet or dry periods were is quite broad, but the recent drought in the Levant region stands out as about 50 per cent drier than the driest period in the past 500 years, and 10 to 20 per cent drier than the worst drought of the past 900 years, a NASA statement reads.
Read more: http://www.news.com.au/technology/environment/climate-change/nasa-study-shows-worst-drought-in-900-years-may-be-behind-middle-east-upheaval/news-story/82b533fc713ba2b743310caaadce7e2e
forest444
(5,902 posts)Your post reminded me of some wise words from Dr. Vandana Shiva, who pointed out that many of today's wars in Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa are, in fact, water wars.
Thanks again for your scholarly thread, and, again, welcome!
fullautohotdog
(90 posts)destabilizing the governments in the region through invasion might have a little to do with the current conflicts...
BTW, the statement from NASA doesn't say the drought is the cause of the current conflicts. From the actual report:
NASA Finds Drought in Eastern Mediterranean Worst of Past 900 Years
"you have the potential for large-scale disruption of food systems as well as potential conflict over water resources," said Kevin Anchukaitis, co-author and climate scientist at the University of Arizona in Tucson.
He said potential, not that this is the actual cause. But it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to come to that conclusion when faced with the data.
Thank you for the thread that has nothing to do with Bernie/Hillary/Trump/Cruz or Nancy Reagan. Definitely worth the look.
Demonaut
(8,914 posts)that had to be in the equation
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)that the uprising in Syria was not, as told by the media, about democracy, but started by a "thousand year" drought.
This is not news, but I'd like to see it in the mainstream media for a change.
killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)And we and our allies have been funding the "totally not terrorists we promise" Islamist opposition for years before all the uprisings. Whatever you think of Assad or the Syrian government, our part in this has been completely shameful.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)Originally posted here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027430510
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)I was not aware of the rural people swarming into the cities from drought. I should have been, but nobody is talking about this here.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)She was clutching her pearls several months ago about us lying extremists talking about the environmental crisis creating middle east upheaval.
When bread prices go up because of drought, and people can't feed their childrenrevolution and civil war ensue.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)mountain grammy
(26,608 posts)ellenrr
(3,864 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)How Repression, Drought & Climate Change Drove the Syrian Civil War
Long before March of 2011, when Syrian demonstrations calling for reform and in some cases, regime change, morphed into a full-blown military conflict that has transformed into a supranational bloodbath, the economic and political policies of Bashar Al-Assads Baathist regime undoubtedly fomented major discontent among various segments of Syrias population. ... events in the south-Syrian bordertown of Deraa would forever change the socio-political dynamics of a nation ruled by the iron fists of the Al-Assad clan for more than four decades. Upon assuming the mantle of power in Syria, Syrians hopeful of political and economic liberalization under the modern, western-educated ophthalmologist-turned-president Bashar Al-Assad were mainly met with disappointment.
However, in a nation where the mukhabarat (secret police informants/intelligence agents) have long infiltrated all segments of society and institutions, a general aura of fear, suspicion, and paranoia persisted well into Bashars reign. I witnessed this first-hand when I visited and stayed in Deraa for a few days with family friends several years before the uprising and recall the kind of vexing stares I received from some of those whom I attempted to raise the issue of Syrian politics with. I was a bit naïve and so I, more than anything, wanted to know if the stories I had heard about Syrian fears of the regime were legit. They were.
During the same year Bashar Al-Assad took power, ninety-nine Syrian intellectuals, writers, and critics crafted and signed the Statement of 99 calling for an end to emergency rule/martial law that had been in place since 1963, for the state to pardon political dissidents detained, imprisoned, deported, or exiled by his fathers regime, formal recognition and implementation of freedom of assembly, press, and expression, as well as an end to the surveillance of its citizens by the secret police and security forces. The movement behind the statement was composed of both anti-regime hardliners as well as moderates who collectively sought political reform. The result of long-festering political and economic dissent among Syrians, the Statement of 99 was a brow-raising announcement that, at minimum, made the regime slightly uncomfortable. The formation of various think-tanks, organizations, and social and political parties coincided with Bashars takeover of Syria- all of which were critical of the regimes political and economic monopolies on the country caused the regime to crack down on dissenters. The following year, in 2001, one thousand academics, critics, and activists launched the Statement of 1,000 which expanded on the previous statements tenets and called for a multi-party democracy to supplant the one-party Baathist state. This was met with another, albeit harsher, government crackdown.
All of these grievances began to fester when anti-regime protests began in early 2011. While initially limited to small demonstrations calling on the lifting of the Emergency Laws and better economic policies, the government was able to contain them with relative ease. When they grew as they did in Deraa in March of that year, the governments crackdowns intensified and greater numbers of Syrians became disillusioned by the regimes insincerity in addressing and implementing political, social, and economic reforms. The zero-tolerance policies of the Assad regime only sought to radicalize some already, economically and politically disenfranchised segments of the Syrian population, some of which had been subdued by his father in previous years and had since been boiling with discontent.
http://www.juancole.com/2014/09/maelstrom-repression-climate.html
Dustlawyer
(10,494 posts)Get ready to fight for Publicly Funded Elections if Bernie wins!
cynzke
(1,254 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)fog nets could collect plenty of fresh water.
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)What a pile of crap. Middle East upheaval is caused by politics and war, FCS!
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)It's things like this that make complex systems ... well, complex.
chapdrum
(930 posts)being thoroughly ignored.
former9thward
(31,963 posts)They have plenty of water for their crops and people. Could it be its because their government is the only non-dictatorship in the region?
NickB79
(19,233 posts)And in so doing, deprived other ME nations of valuable water resources.
That, and they have the money to build desalination plants to supplement their water needs.
former9thward
(31,963 posts)But never blame the backward dictatorships of the ME.
TowneshipRebellion
(92 posts)nt.