Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 01:47 PM Jun 2012

Democrats appear to take Senate; Walker plans bipartisan summit

Source: Journal Sentinel of Milwaukee, Wisconsin


By Jason Stein and Patrick Marley of the Journal Sentinel Updated: 12:10 p.m.

Madison - A triumphant Gov. Scott Walker will meet with his cabinet Wednesday on jobs and start planning a Wisconsin-style bipartisan summit with lawmakers over brats and beer.

But for at least six months, it appears that he could have to accommodate a newly Democratic Senate. Republicans needed to win all four state Senate recall races Tuesday to hold onto that house but were declared winners in only three of those contests.

According to the unofficial tally by The Associated Press, GOP Sen. Van Wanggaard of Racine trailed by 779 votes to Democratic challenger and former Sen. John Lehman. The race has not been called by The Associated Press nor conceded by Wanggaard, though Democrats have declared victory.

Read more: http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/walker-to-meet-with-cabinet-on-jobs-8i5mapa-157488605.html



If the Democrats do their job this will be almost as good as removing Walker.

But will they have the balls to be as obstructionist as the GOP can be?
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats appear to take Senate; Walker plans bipartisan summit (Original Post) yurbud Jun 2012 OP
So NOW the little fucker wants to be "bipartisan?" What happened to "My way or the highway?" MADem Jun 2012 #1
"Bipartisan" Turbineguy Jun 2012 #12
Precisely. sybylla Jun 2012 #14
bipartisan, now?!! STFU Scotty! katty Jun 2012 #2
any talk of a general strike? wial Jun 2012 #3
The legislature is not in session. former9thward Jun 2012 #4
so why the brats? PatrynXX Jun 2012 #6
He doing the 'brats' for PR after a hard fought name calling election. former9thward Jun 2012 #8
Think Walker wouldn't have called a special session if they won all seats and took back the senate? sybylla Jun 2012 #15
No I don't. former9thward Jun 2012 #17
So you don't think they had a few more legislative items on the wish list after Galloway resigned? sybylla Jun 2012 #21
I am not in Wisconsin so I defer to those that are. former9thward Jun 2012 #22
The legislature is adjourned until January 7, 2013 lutefisk Jun 2012 #5
I see a four word text message: accelerate smash and grab yurbud Jun 2012 #7
I'm beginning to think demographics will not, in fact, kill them eventually. The Stranger Jun 2012 #16
The GOP will never win over enough Latinos and blacks to stay afloat yurbud Jun 2012 #18
also, the part of the working class they've captured is animated by racism which isn't nearly as yurbud Jun 2012 #19
First, if the Repukes had won all four Senate seats, Walker would have called a special session... Scuba Jun 2012 #9
Wis Dems have bigger balls than the national Dems pstokely Jun 2012 #10
Oh yeah. Scuba Jun 2012 #11
I'm from Texas and I cannot believe for a second this is over ..... marble falls Jun 2012 #13
The state senate should start out leftynyc Jun 2012 #20
"But will they have the balls to be as obstructionist as the GOP can be?" shcrane71 Jun 2012 #23
and sticks as well as carrots. No one wants to be an unexplained car accident or plane crash yurbud Jun 2012 #24

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. So NOW the little fucker wants to be "bipartisan?" What happened to "My way or the highway?"
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 01:55 PM
Jun 2012

"Do as I say, not as I do?" "I talk, you listen?"

So now he wants, er, NEEDS... to be bipartisan?


Lying, hypocritical piece of crap!!! He can't get shit done without the legislature behind him. I hope the WI Senate gets very creative.

Turbineguy

(37,313 posts)
12. "Bipartisan"
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 07:19 PM
Jun 2012

is repub speak for "My Way or the Highway!". "Compromise" is when the Democrat in the discussion commits suicide.

He's a busy guy. He has to fuck over a lot of people before the indictment comes down.

sybylla

(8,507 posts)
14. Precisely.
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 09:27 PM
Jun 2012

This is all about looking bipartisan without actually having to be bipartisan. Especially since they aren't going to do a damn thing in the legislature until after the November election, Wanker has no reason to expect he'll ever be called to account for this supposed bipartisan meeting.

wial

(437 posts)
3. any talk of a general strike?
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 02:13 PM
Jun 2012

if Wisconsin is serious about stopping this, that might be a move to consider. The American Revolution was won by a smaller minority.

former9thward

(31,970 posts)
4. The legislature is not in session.
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 02:16 PM
Jun 2012

And it won't be in session until after the next set of elections in November. So there is nothing to be "obstructionist" about.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
6. so why the brats?
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 03:29 PM
Jun 2012

Scott must see a threat somewhere. Otherwise the Brats would be silly. I'm thinking an arrest in the John Doe probe might cause a special session. and thats where the threat lies. So if he were um put up on the John Doe charges for stealing from the vets... that might be a problem if the state senate is not in his hands.

former9thward

(31,970 posts)
8. He doing the 'brats' for PR after a hard fought name calling election.
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 05:55 PM
Jun 2012

I don't know of the status of the investigation and I doubt anyone here knows either. I have seen a lot of predictions here about various people (Rove, etc.) about to be indicted and it usually does not turn out to be true.

sybylla

(8,507 posts)
15. Think Walker wouldn't have called a special session if they won all seats and took back the senate?
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 11:57 PM
Jun 2012

Their last session ended prematurely (as I expect most things do with Scott Walker), when one of the recalled Repub state senators resigned the minute the papers were filed, leaving the senate split. Immediately, they stopped considering any further legislation.

So, yeah, this win is a big block. And if they can keep the majority, there will be no problem using their power to continue to obstruct Walker's Kochaine habit.

former9thward

(31,970 posts)
17. No I don't.
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 12:55 PM
Jun 2012

If they had won all the seats they would have held the senate --not took it back. If he he wanted a special session he would have called it before the elections not after. What would be the reason for a special session? The budget has been passed.

sybylla

(8,507 posts)
21. So you don't think they had a few more legislative items on the wish list after Galloway resigned?
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 03:50 PM
Jun 2012

I can't buy it.

Secondly, the way they are crowing even though they didn't regain control tells me they would have have had no inhibitions about reconvening in special session not only to finish up the check list from the regular session but to come up with a little more red meat to reward/motivate the base for November.

But you are welcome to your own opinion.

former9thward

(31,970 posts)
22. I am not in Wisconsin so I defer to those that are.
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 04:10 PM
Jun 2012

I am a political junkie as are most here so I try and base opinions on what I read.

lutefisk

(3,974 posts)
5. The legislature is adjourned until January 7, 2013
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 02:23 PM
Jun 2012

And unfortunately, it will be very, very difficult for Democrats to force any kind of special session.

This bipartisan window dressing will fade away quickly. No doubt Walker has his post election orders for privatizing the state and ensuring Republican/Corporate rule for as long as possible.

edit: oops, didn't former9thward's post...

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
7. I see a four word text message: accelerate smash and grab
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 05:34 PM
Jun 2012

Republicans know demographics are going to kill them eventually, and the wealthy know that the democratization of information is going to make rule by the few to the detriment of the many very difficult in not much more time.

So the plan is to smash and grab, transfer as much of the commons into their hands as they can now, so taking it back will look like commie expropriation, and destroy protections for working people so they take that much longer to rebuild.

The rich should see that an FDR in the White House or at the state level would serve their interests bests by giving the general public just enough that they return to their apathetic coma, but instead, they are doing everything to ensure something like a French Revolution (hopefully non-violent) that will leave them with nothing.

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
16. I'm beginning to think demographics will not, in fact, kill them eventually.
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 01:19 AM
Jun 2012

I think now that I was underestimating the power of money in politics and the amazing phenomenon of the working class voting straight ticket Republican, in essence the proles keeping the intelligentsia hostage -- not Big Brother.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
19. also, the part of the working class they've captured is animated by racism which isn't nearly as
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 01:47 PM
Jun 2012

strong in younger generations.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
9. First, if the Repukes had won all four Senate seats, Walker would have called a special session...
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 06:13 PM
Jun 2012

... to further advance his extreme agenda. Our win in Racine is huge.

Secondly, your question about the Democrats having the balls to obstruct is absurd. Ever hear of the "Fab 14"?

marble falls

(57,063 posts)
13. I'm from Texas and I cannot believe for a second this is over .....
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 08:38 PM
Jun 2012

he's probably going to jail, right?

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
20. The state senate should start out
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 01:51 PM
Jun 2012

by saying very simply - you first - what are you willing to give up to compromise and then make it VERY public so the little shit can't talk out of both sides of his mouth.

shcrane71

(1,721 posts)
23. "But will they have the balls to be as obstructionist as the GOP can be?"
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 04:23 PM
Jun 2012

That's the million dollar question. All it takes is one Dem to turn, and the rethugs sure have the money to persuade.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Democrats appear to take ...