Clinton apologizes for calling Nancy Reagan a 'very effective, low-key' AIDS advocate
Source: CNN.com
St. Louis (CNN)Hillary Clinton apologized on Friday for calling the late Nancy Reagan a "very effective, low-key" advocate on AIDS/HIV, saying she "misspoke" in an interview with MSNBC.
Clinton said the former first lady, who died on Sunday, "started a national conversation" on AIDS that "penetrated the public conscience and people began to say, 'Hey, we have to do something about this, too,'" during an interview with the network at Reagan's funeral.
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/11/politics/hillary-clinton-nancy-reagan-aids/index.html
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)With narrative? You don't, that's a lie.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)Especially when one has an entire presidential campaign staff at ones fingertips who should know better.
Why? Why make shit up?
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Realllllllllly Clinton?
Arazi
(6,829 posts)But there's no,way since Alzheimer's has never been stigmatized.
She's lying again!!!
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)Arazi
(6,829 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)the whole world can see that she had praised Nancy Reagan's Alzheimer's advocacy and was done with that topic. Damn videos!
Skeeter Barnes
(994 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)If thousands of us yelling at Reagan to DO SOMETHING about the dying men and the disease, then there WAS " a national conversation"
albeit in strenuously loud and frustrated tones.
Clinton needs to set aside an Apology Day, one day a week where she can do a mea culpa for all her "mis-spokes" .
LS_Editor
(893 posts)She's running to be the presidential nominee for the side that cares about facts. Maybe she forgot...
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)jalan48
(13,853 posts)Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)your hrc shills in that hrc group you kick people out of so you can have your echo chamber really have to disinfect yourselves with lye daily.
Goldwater Girl
Kissinger lover
Former Wal-mart board member
DOMA supporter
NAFTA supporter
Honduran child deporting supporter
Drug war supporter
Raygun Democrat
Voted for te Iraq War
$17M in secret speeches to Wall Street
If a Republican were all these things, you'd all go nuts. But because it's HRC the Demi-Goddess, it's all good and can be explained.
And when you can't explain, you get smug and aloof.
She is Republican Lite.
Her apology is unaccepted because she said it. On the Record. . .she owns it now. All the backpeddling and walking back does nothing.
And any LGBT person who now supports her might as well run the knife over their wrists since she has thrown you all under teh bus to pander to the Republican mouth breathers by praise the Spawn of Hell spouse of the Sith Lord himself.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)cynical attempt at manipulation of people who she must think won't know any better - and will vote for her because she seems to care. Stupid on soooo many levels.
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)Now that she has that, what does she need LGBT people for?
Just like having been endorsed by the Planned Parenthood management she seems able to "evolve" on women's absolute right to abortion.
Aldo Leopold
(685 posts)"Started a national conversation."
Among whom? Self righteous assholes?
About what? How to look the other way?
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)........this will be dragged out until she clinches the nomination.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)until she has finally lost the nomination for a SECOND time!
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Gore1FL
(21,126 posts)Mispeaks, misvotes, missupports, misrepresents, etc to the point that you have to ask if she is tone-deaf, bumbling, manipulative, rudderless, pandering or some combination of all theses things.
If it was a time or two thing, fine, but it isn't. It's a pattern.
If she wins the nomination, I'll vote for her, In that case, I hope to vote for her primary challenger in 2020.
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)The first, but certainly not the last, of my friends who would die of it. I well remember the 80's, the Reagans, and HIV/AIDS. Because I was aware early enough to know what it was called first, GRID and "gay" cancer. Which only added another layer to the bigotry and the lack of response. It was only gay people dying, you know <insert any number of hateful jokes being told at the time, and still are>.
It wasn't difficult to talk about. Because we were talking about it and talking loudly. It was difficult to get anyone to listen. Because those with the power to help didn't care. Huge difference. Major difference. A critical, life-saving difference.
No, it isn't "hard to remember" how the Reagan Administration (to include his wife) behaved during that time - It's impossible to forget.
"The other point to make, too, is it may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS back in the 1980s," Clinton said. "And because of both President and Mrs. Reagan, in particular Mrs. Reagan, we started a national conversation, when before nobody would talk about it."
Clinton added: "Nobody wanted to do anything about it. And, you know, that too is something that I really appreciate with her very effective low-key advocacy, but it penetrated the public conscience and people began to say, hey, we have to do something about this, too."
I'll be polite in comment.
What utterly contemptible bullshit.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)how fucking trite is that?
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)Because she's wrong a lot. Not the quality we need in a president.
840high
(17,196 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)When that doesn't workthen it's a misspeak.
Mr.Bill
(24,267 posts)I mean how do you fuck up attending a funeral?
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)to cynically pander to groups you want voting for you. In effect, she was using her attendance at a funeral as a campaign stop.
Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)Beyond inappropriate at a funeral.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)and what they each bring to the role she said "UP UNTIL NOW...HER... and HER... (emphasis added) she appeared to be alluding to having a First Husband in the WH. You're counting those chickens before they hatch, H.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Did she evolve into that position?
The deed is done, too late for apologies.
Mrs. Clinton lost my vote for ANY office that she runs for!
revbones
(3,660 posts)It wasn't a misplaced word as she claimed, she steered toward that subject
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)at the end talking about First Ladies and what they each bring to the role she said "UP UNTIL NOW...HER... and HER... (emphasis added) she appeared to be alluding to having a First Husband in the WH. You're counting those chickens before they hatch, H.
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)Otherwise she would be perfectly fine letting this lie stand.
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)Lying Liars gotta' Lie...
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)xocet
(3,871 posts)She took sniper fire....and...Nancy Reagan was an AIDS/HIV advocate...?
Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)Early in Reagan's first term the UN recommended $2 billion funding to address the HIV/AIDS virus. After Reagans two terms less than $20 million had been invested. During Clinton's two terms HIV/AIDS was the number one cause of death for 25 to 49 year old adults.
It is interesting that one who claims she has committed a life to healthcare issues, is so ignorant on this issue that has caused 39 million deaths.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)......uh huh.......
Lazy Daisy
(928 posts)a fruit basket. If it not for him and the Chicago rally taking up the news cycle, THIS would be the hot topic today and tomorrow.
Once again Trumps campaign helps shelter the hot mess that is Hillary Clinton.
pothos
(154 posts)both her original statement and her "apology" were repugnant.