Sanders wins support of Idaho superdelegate
Source: The Hill
Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders added another superdelegate to his count Thursday.
Democratic National Committeeman Pete Gertonson announced he will support Sanders after the Vermont senator's huge win in Idaho, Politico reported.
Pent-up frustrations of a red state, exploded Idaho Caucuses to historic numbers last Tuesday night, with 78 % for Bernie Sanders, Gertonson wrote.
Im proud to be an Idaho Democrat representing the peoples choice. Ill cast our Super Delegate vote for Bernie Sanders!
Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/dem-primaries/274170-sanders-wins-support-of-idaho-superdelegate
This is a really big deal! Why, you ask? Because it proves super delegates will side with the whoever wins the state.
Even if they are with the DNC!
SamKnause
(13,089 posts)Your last paragraph is not true however.
Howard Dean is a super delegate that supports Hillary.
Hillary received zero delegates from Vermont.
She didn't meet the 15% viability mark.
Howard Dean still gave his super delegate endorsement to Hillary.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)But that doesn't disprove my last paragraph so much as add a caveat.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Has he said who he is supporting?
By the way, interesting fact, Bernie Sanders is himself a super delegate.
SamKnause
(13,089 posts)Awesome, I didn't know that about Bernie.
pnwmom
(108,972 posts)since Patrick Leahy may well have solid personal reasons, based on long experience, for his choice.
Autumn Colors
(2,379 posts)Guess the huge amount by which Bernie won Vermont doesn't make a damn bit of difference to him.
http://digital.vpr.net/post/however-vermont-votes-leahy-says-his-superdelegate-vote-clintons
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)Fmr. Gov. Dean was fast into the Clinton boat, quelle surprise!! He has been touting Mrs. Clinton's merits to any media outlet that lets him put his pout to camera.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)That vote against the will of the people. Special interests rarely care about the little people anyway. It only goes to highlight what is wrong with our party, and why we need to fix it.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)That could make it a lot easier to ignore voters.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)He can always shift his allegiance to Bernie later.
gsb54
(89 posts)Bernie won in my state and I believe the superdelegates from our state need to support the movement of the people. Just as the article here shows.
Thanks for the post.
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)maybe they should be added up, totaled, and placed into candidates columns to see where that gets us.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Right along with HRC supporters... except that SD's don't actually count until they actually cast a vote... sort of like normal delegates... just at the very end of the primary.
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)I've not been counting them, but nice for you to lump everyone in together.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)I hate getting painted with the broad brush too... I will say many of them do though.
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)This is my thing, I'm going to support and vote for the nominee.
Look at the other side right now, I mean really look.
We have two adults debating and having a conversation and the republicans are totally fucking nuts (I'll paint them with said broad brush).
They have Cruz and Trump...
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Autumn Colors
(2,379 posts)at the convention ... period.
Response to Bubzer (Original post)
Post removed
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)chwaliszewski
(1,514 posts)Hope to see you when he hits the 100 mark.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)but should be in GD-P, not LBN
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)If you think it shouldn't be here, then send up an alert.
Response to Bubzer (Reply #16)
Post removed
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)So long!
LOL-
If I was a troll I would have a badass Bridge- It would be d-bomb!
zentrum
(9,865 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Duval
(4,280 posts)SheenaR
(2,052 posts)Let's get to the convention with a chance. Many many Supers put their preference out there before this even became a race
I see no empirical data saying they will change their minds, but if their constituents voice their feelings there may be many that change their minds.
greymouse
(872 posts)and the superdelegates throw it to Hillary, she will be lucky to win one state.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Hillary has never been to Idaho.
dchill
(38,462 posts)when she does show up to collect those votes that are hers already.
George II
(67,782 posts)Of course, the tally is now:
Sanders 27, Clinton 482 (+455)
BUT, if you want to count only superdelegates for states in which the candidates have won, that brings the tally to:
Sanders 15, Clinton 267 (+252)
Yes, it really IS a big deal.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)beastie boy
(9,274 posts)... after their vote is cast?
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)If they overrule the regular delegates, they will likely destroy the democratic party for generations.
beastie boy
(9,274 posts)...not if they overrule pledged delegates... what would constitute that? Overruling national popular vote? But what if they are state-specific delegates?... Overruling pledged delegates state by state? But what if they are national-level delegates? Overruling the votes cast by independents? But what if they are DNC delegates?
And what about the delegates committed to Hillary that Bernie is counting on to overrule their commitment?
With the superdelegates representing so many different constituencies, I am really at a loss as to where to insert your addendum.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)beastie boy
(9,274 posts)Can I quote you on this one too?
jillan
(39,451 posts)What a concept!
kennetha
(3,666 posts)and just go with the will of the voters is silly. If that were the point, then there may as not be any super delegates.
It used to be that parties held very few primaries to elect delegates to their conventions. Then they added more and more primaries. Super delegates represent a trend away from letting primaries alone decide who the nominee will be.
So it's a mixed system. There are all kinds of stakeholders in the democratic party. Some states restrict voting to declared members of the party. Some allow independents and even Republicans to vote in their primaries. Super delegates are different and unique constituency of the party, with a different sort of stake in the party. They are not just passive reflectors of the "will of the people." They are there to exercise independent judgment, from people who have a day to day stake in the business of building and maintaining the party and also the day to day business of governing.
It is very, very telling that those sort of stakeholders side, almost unanimously, with Clinton and reject Sanders.
stopbush
(24,393 posts)Carol Boyce has already committed to Hillary. The two remaining supers from ID have not yet committed.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Machiavellian in intent.
George II
(67,782 posts)...221 of them have endorsed Clinton, 6 (all Representatives) have endorsed Sanders.
166 of 188 Representatives have endorsed Clinton, many of those served for years with Sanders in the House. And 40 of 44 Senators, all of whom now serve with Sanders in the Senate, have endorsed Clinton.
Just what does that say when essentially your co-workers can't even bring themselves to support Sanders?
NJCher
(35,643 posts)you're hoping for some primo lobbying job and you know full well Bernie's going to ruin that scam for you.
Cher
Optimism
(142 posts)So pumped up about Saturday's caucus ( and tomorrow evening's Safeco Field Sanders rally here in Seattle ... it's going to be yuuuuuuuge!).
Hoping for the same caucus percentages as our neighbor to the east ... Idaho!
In the meantime let's forward this Superdelegate info to Washington's own Superdelegates (all in the bag for Hillary thus far) ... urging them to do the same as Gertonson once the caucus votes are tallied. How nice (for democracy) if they were to concede to actually represent their constituencies (instead of just Boeing). Keeping hope alive ...
Let's raise our voices ...
McDermott : http://mcdermott.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=476&Itemid=8
Murray : http://www.murray.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contactme
Cantwell : http://www.cantwell.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/email-maria
Inslee : https://fortress.wa.gov/es/governor/
mountain grammy
(26,605 posts)I'm waiting to see how Colorado super delegates vote, since the people's choice in our state is Bernie Sanders.
libodem
(19,288 posts)Yavin4
(35,427 posts)So, now they do?
imagine2015
(2,054 posts)continue to show Sanders is doing much better against the Republican presidential candidate, the super delegates will abandon her in droves.
Especially those in states that Sanders won in primaries.
It would be an "open" convention.
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)davidthegnome
(2,983 posts)Super delegates should not exist. It's not a democratic system - and the potential for abuse is very, very high. I'm not referring to just this election, either.... others should also be considered. Pledged delegates are something else entirely - they are required to actually represent the votes of their districts, but super delegates can pretty much make whatever decision they please... and one vote from them is somehow worth thousands of votes from everyone else. It's not democratic, it's not fair, it sure as heck isn't super. It also discourages a lot of voters, who, even now, when I explain to them what a super delegate is (I've been surprised by the number of people who have no clue)... they are shocked. They tell me it's not fair - and they're absolutely right.
This doesn't really prove anything. Super delegates will, hopefully, side with who ever ends up leading in the popular vote towards the end of the process, or at least vote with their states. However, there is no requirement, legal or otherwise, for them to actually do so. They absolutely can alter the course of an election or primary.
snort
(2,334 posts)I like it. The Peoples Party with the Lion. Nice touch.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)we can bring the superdelegates on board