Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
U.S. Drops California Case Against Apple After Accessing iPhone
Source: Bloomberg
March 28, 2016 5:50 PM EDT
The Department of Justice said Monday it no longer needed Apple's assistance to access the iPhone involved in the San Bernardino shooting case. Last week, the government asked to delay a court hearing while it tried a third-party method to access the iPhone.
Story developing...
Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-28/u-s-drops-california-case-against-apple-after-accessing-iphone
FBI Has Accessed San Bernardino ShooterS Phone Without AppleS Help
By Matt Zapotosky March 28 at 5:50 PM
The Justice Department is abandoning its bid to force Apple to help it unlock the iPhone used by one of the shooters in the San Bernardino terrorist attack because investigators have found a way in without the tech giants assistance, prosecutors wrote in a court filing Monday.
The government said that investigators had now accessed the data stored on the shooters iPhone and no longer needed Apples help. They asked a court to vacate an earlier ruling forcing Apple to provide assistance.
The stunning move averts a courtroom showdown between Apple and federal prosecutors that many in the tech community had warned might set dangerous precedents.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-28/u-s-drops-california-case-against-apple-after-accessing-iphone
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1566 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Drops California Case Against Apple After Accessing iPhone (Original Post)
Purveyor
Mar 2016
OP
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)1. Who did it for them? nt
Justice
(7,185 posts)2. Israeli company Cellebrite
http://www.theverge.com/2016/3/23/11290374/apple-iphone-fbi-encryption-crack-cellebrite
"Though Ynet didnt go into detail about how Cellebrite is working around the iPhones built-in security measures, experts speculate the attack is based on a NAND mirroring technique, which involves essentially copying the flash memory of the device so it can be restored after a lockscreen wipe. US Representative Darrel Issa directly asked FBI Director James Comey about the possibility of using this technique during a House Judiciary hearing last month. The bureau is now well aware of its existence, and theres no reason to believe it wont work on the iPhone 5C in question. Notably, this method will run into problems on phones with a Secure Enclave, ruling out any phones beyond the 5S."
I think tomorrow's news will be - Apple agrees to acquire Cellebrite.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)3. I don't think Mossad will sell. nt
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)4. In short...
Your iPhone is not really secure.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)5. Depends on the model.
Newer phones may not have this issue based on hardware changes.