Trucks Are Getting More Dangerous And Drivers Are Falling Asleep At The Wheel. Thank Congress.
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by mcar (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: HuffingtonPost
WASHINGTON Illinois State Trooper Douglas Balder sat in his squad car, its red and blue lights strobing into the frozen night of Jan. 27, 2014. He was about to be set on fire.... A heavy-duty tow truck and a bright yellow Tollway assistance vehicle were also pulled over, attending to the stranded semi....He had positioned his 2011 Crown Victoria behind the Tollway vehicle and switched on his flashers. There were also flares sputtering on the pavement, and the Tollway truck was flashing a large blinking arrow and its amber hazard lights. Visibility on that clear, cold night was excellent ... Renato Velasquez, who was barreling toward the stopped vehicles in a flatbed big rig loaded with three massive rolls of steel, didnt see Balders flashers. He didnt see the pulsing arrow or the flares. He didnt change lanes or take any evasive action until far too late. Velasquez was falling asleep, a court would find later. His truck rammed into Balders squad car at 63 miles per hour, according to the National Transportation Safety Board investigation into the accident.
The impact crushed the Crown Vics trunk, exploding the gas tank and catapulting the patrol car into a roadside ditch. The three 14,580-pound steel coils chained to Velazquezs trailer bed burst their restraints. One of the massive rolls struck the cab of the Tollway vehicle, instantly killing its 39-year-old driver Vincent Petrella and injuring Agron Xhelaj, the driver of the stalled truck who was seated beside him....I woke up a short time later on fire, he said. Literally on fire. Burning alive..... His squad car was half collapsed. The detonated gas tank was spraying fuel and flames through his cab. His only clear thoughts were of survival and of his wife of 14 years, Kimberlie. He yelled out her name.... Truck-related deaths hit an all-time low during the economic doldrums of 2009, when 2,983 truck accidents killed 3,380 people. But as the economy has recovered, the carnage has been on the rise. In 2013, the most recent year for which finalized statistics are available, 3,541 wrecks killed 3,964 people an increase of 17.3 percent in just four years. In 2014, the number of deaths resulting from truck accidents was down slightly, but the total number of crashes and injuries increased.
At the same time, Congress has been caving, very quietly, to lobbying from trucking interests that want to roll back, block or modify at least a half-dozen important safety regulations. Significant parts of the hauling industry have long opposed many of the federal rules governing working hours, rest periods, size and weight limits, and safety standards. When the Great Recession began in 2008, profit margins for shippers shrank and bankruptcies rose, prompting a desperate industry to step up its lobbying effort.
Perhaps, the trucking companies lobbyists suggested to Congress, trucks could haul loads heavier than the federal 80,000-pound limit, which would allow them to deliver more goods with each truck. Maybe they could have longer double trailers, increasing the limit from 28 feet for each unit to 33 feet turning each rig into an 80-foot-long behemoth, as long as an eight-story building is tall. Or they could let truck drivers be more flexible with their rest breaks, which would allow them to work up to 82 hours a week instead of the already-exhausting limit of 70. Maybe trucking firms could reduce labor costs by hiring lower-paid drivers, younger than 21 as young as 18. Maybe they could stop federal regulators from raising insurance requirements that were set during the Reagan administration. Maybe the federal motor carrier safety ratings for unsafe trucking companies could be kept secret..... If they are successful, these changes would amount to the most significant overhaul of highway safety rules in decades. But most people dont know such sweeping revisions are even being considered.... The latest round of congressional wrangling started with a fight over snoring, or, more specifically, the obstructive sleep apnea that causes it.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/congress-made-trucking-deadlier_us_56fd6f92e4b0a06d58052ee8
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)I think truck inspections were made more lenient for Mexican trucks. I think before that any truck driven in the US had to pass inspection in the US and that was changed.
I know that companies want the drivers to drive longer hours and that would jsut be so dangerous.
WhiteTara
(29,699 posts)which is another recipe for disaster in the sky. The roads and the sky are unsafe now; with more tired and sleep deprived pilots and drivers we will be in for many more deaths.
2naSalit
(86,501 posts)trucker, I can attest that this is insane. I won't drive anything longer than 80ft in length.
btw,
math is wrong, they are talking about 3x33ft of trailer, not counting the drawbar in between which means at least 8ft in between each trailer and then there's a good 18 - 25ft of tractor in the from so we're actually talking about trucks over 110ft long!!!
99
16
+20 (on average)
__________________
135ft being the average length of one of these proposed vehicle combos.
That's insane. Not only that, multiple trailers are not easy to control, back in the day we called them "wiggle wagons" and you have to make sure they are stable before you can pass them and then the front of your trailer, if it's the box style or solid high profile, the air displacement between the two vehicles actually causes a pushing and pulling situation at each end of both vehicles which can cause some nasty issues all by themselves.
Just say "no" folks. Remember, safety first.
Triana
(22,666 posts)Which do not conform to the same US safety standards and whose drivers do not have to have the same training as US truck drivers.
Never before has this been allowed but I think it is now. If I'm right, then surely this isn't helping matters any at all.
certainot
(9,090 posts)Brickbat
(19,339 posts)transport companies are so interested in "driverless" technology. They would rather invest millions in something that eliminates employees than pay a little extra for someone to get two more hours of sleep a day.
former9thward
(31,961 posts)The link cites two problems and Congress has nothing to do with either one.
First:
For decades, mounting evidence has shown that sleep apnea, a common disorder, can cause perilous levels of fatigue in drivers, pilots, train engineers and others who need to remain alert at work. The airways of people who suffer from apnea close repeatedly while they sleep, interrupting their breathing dozens of times an hour. They often dont notice the interruptions, but it leaves them exhausted and prone to doze off during the day. Behind the wheel of a large, speeding vehicle, the results are predictably catastrophic.
The risk of apnea rises dramatically with weight gain, and approximately two-thirds of all truck drivers are believed to be obese, according to a recent federal survey. Other studies have also found that truckers are much more likely to be overweight than workers in other fields. And extensive research links sleep deprivation to heightened crash risks; even moderate tiredness can impair a driver as much as being legally intoxicated. A recent Harvard study found truck drivers with obstructive sleep apnea are five times more likely to crash than their fellows.
Congress has nothing to do with truckers being obese.
Second:
To do a better job dealing with the issue, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration floated a proposal in April 2012 that would have required overweight truckers to get checked for sleep apnea. The industry was livid. Some drivers claimed there was no evidence that sleep apnea raised the risk of crashes, while others alleged the proposal was a scheme to enrich sleep doctors.
Independent truckers are especially loath to admit a problem because treatment can take them off the road for a month or more. And sleep tests and treatment cost thousands of dollars for people with inadequate or no health insurance.
Despite acknowledging the problem and the need to deal with it, FMCSA backed off its push to update the apnea rules. Just a week after posting the proposal, the agency withdrew it, claiming it was published in error.
The FMCSA is an Executive agency which is not under Congressional control. That would be Obama.
Kingofalldems
(38,440 posts)Does not account for the rise in accidents.
Incredibly poor defense of republicans.
former9thward
(31,961 posts)Didn't think so. If you had you would have posted how Congress is the problem. Typical of your posts.