Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 01:44 PM Jun 2016

NATO Couldn’t Repel Baltic Invasion By Russia: U.S. General

Source: Agence France-Presse /JIJI

AFP-JIJI
Jun 23, 2016

BERLIN – NATO would currently be unable to protect the Baltics against a Russian attack, the commander of U.S. ground forces in Europe, Gen. Ben Hodges, said in a news report Wednesday.

“Russia could take over the Baltic states faster than we would be able to defend them,” Hodges was quoted as saying in a German-language article by news weekly Die Zeit.

The general said he agreed with an assessment by military analysts who claimed that Russian forces could conquer the capitals of Baltic states Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia within 36 to 60 hours.

Hodges also said NATO forces had found numerous deficiencies during the recent “Anaconda” military exercise in Poland, according to the article from Thursday’s edition of the paper, released early to AFP.

Read more: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/06/23/world/nato-couldnt-repel-baltic-invasion-russia-u-s-general/#.V2wfgjVI4pk

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
8. This article is quoting our General and referencing a report released this morning. Should be fine
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 02:32 PM
Jun 2016

right where it is but one never can tell...

cstanleytech

(26,236 posts)
11. Well thats why I suggested the move since articles about someones opinion and or analysis
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 04:29 PM
Jun 2016

are at risk of falling victim to the LBN about analysis and opinion pieces.

drm604

(16,230 posts)
3. That's practically an invitation.
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 02:01 PM
Jun 2016

I guess we have to trust that he knows what he's doing with such an announcement.

newthinking

(3,982 posts)
9. It's safe because this whole thing is a narrative for other reasons
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 02:36 PM
Jun 2016

He can say this freely because he knows that Russia has no plans to invade the baltics.

If folks really want to try and understand the state of modern journalism and changes to war reporting since 9/11 just do some digging and it reveals quickly.

The times that Orwell talked about where "Oceana" always had a war narrative on have actually come to pass. Hell, I was sleeping myself until a couple of years ago.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
5. I don't think that's exactly a newsflash.
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 02:11 PM
Jun 2016

Russia could get there "firstest with the mostest."

(Incorrectly attributed to Nathan Bedford Forrest, but funny nonetheless)

 

Geronimoe

(1,539 posts)
7. Let's raise taxes
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 02:31 PM
Jun 2016

we need to be able to defeat Russia within 24 hours. Just like we did with the terrorists.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»NATO Couldn’t Repel Balti...