Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 11:20 PM Jun 2016

Bill Clinton and AG Loretta Lynch meet privately

Source: CNN

Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton met privately on Monday in Phoenix, Arizona, after the two realized they were on the same tarmac, an aide to Clinton said.

The meeting took place at an Arizona airport ahead of the public release Tuesday morning of the House Benghazi committee's report on the September 11, 2012, attack on a U.S. consulate in Libya.

Speaking at a news conference in Phoenix on Tuesday, Lynch confirmed the meeting and denied the two spoke about any matter pending before the Justice Department or the Benghazi probe. She also said the former president "did not raise anything" about an ongoing case or anything of that nature.

"I did see President Clinton at the Phoenix airport as he was leaving and spoke to myself and my husband on the plane," Lynch said according to CNN affiliate KNXV/ABC15. "Our conversation was a great deal about grandchildren, it was primarily social about our travels and he mentioned golf he played in Phoenix."

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/29/politics/bill-clinton-loretta-lynch/index.html

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bill Clinton and AG Loretta Lynch meet privately (Original Post) NWCorona Jun 2016 OP
La-La-La-La ... Nothing to see here. 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 #1
What are you trying to say? Kingofalldems Jun 2016 #2
OMG! OMG! BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #30
when you have friends in politics such meetings are probably rather common nt msongs Jun 2016 #3
It probably was a Grey Poupon moment NWCorona Jun 2016 #4
with a white noise machine reddread Jun 2016 #5
Yes. And that! NWCorona Jun 2016 #6
Washington DC is a SMALL TOWN. MADem Jun 2016 #7
Candy crush?... sounds suspicious to me. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #8
LOL--apparently it is the heir to 'Angry Birds' as the mobile time waster of choice! nt MADem Jun 2016 #10
Lol~ CT! sheshe2 Jun 2016 #12
DWS PLAYS CANDY CRUSH TOO!!!!11111 obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #15
Hahaha! nt MADem Jun 2016 #35
Is that even legal? Shouldn't Trey Gowdy The Second Stone Jun 2016 #9
Quick--someone appropriate seven million bucks! MADem Jun 2016 #11
Rethugs Are, videohead5 Jun 2016 #13
So are some du'ers. La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #19
Yep. The usual suspects. eom BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #26
my candidate didn't win, so i'm going to tear down the person who did win. sad really La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #28
Yep. The burn the village to save it scenario. BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #31
they can be as clever as they want but SPOILER ALERT: hillary won. Hillary will win in Nov. La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #32
Saw a reference to this on another board... Wounded Bear Jun 2016 #25
Seeing as Loretta's husband was RIGHT THERE, ya gotta give Bill props for sheer MADem Jun 2016 #37
maybe it was a Rick and Ilsa moment. was Louie there too? msongs Jun 2016 #14
Scarborough and Brzezinski venting their Anti-Clinton spleen as usual on Morning Joe, and no one OnDoutside Jun 2016 #16
Seems like poor judgment on Lynch's part to meet ... Scuba Jun 2016 #17
Must be recused from decision making laserhaas Jun 2016 #18
Lol La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #20
Absurd philosslayer Jun 2016 #21
Remember when there was something about Clarence Thomas and his wife Press Virginia Jun 2016 #34
... BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #27
It wasn't a "meeting." No one had it on their calendar. MADem Jun 2016 #38
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #42
And, since you posted this, Loki Jun 2016 #22
I'm saying it looks bad and I haven't heard anyone with a legal background say otherwise. NWCorona Jun 2016 #23
Oh, I see. Loki Jun 2016 #40
Why assume? NWCorona Jun 2016 #41
I don't believe in coincidences nt riderinthestorm Jun 2016 #24
True deathrind Jun 2016 #29
There's no info to think it could be a coincidence. NWCorona Jun 2016 #33
Are you kidding? Bill knows better than that. Lynch is over the entire FBI investigation of Hillary Zen Democrat Jun 2016 #36
It does seem odd. NWCorona Jun 2016 #39
I do wish Bill would just sit in a corner till the election renate Jun 2016 #43
The Clintons more than anyone kacekwl Jun 2016 #44
He said hello in the airplane tavernier Jun 2016 #45
appearances renate Jun 2016 #46

MADem

(135,425 posts)
7. Washington DC is a SMALL TOWN.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 12:38 AM
Jun 2016

The Clintons do have a home there. Loretta and Bill's wife both worked for the same boss.

I would be shocked if these two couples didn't travel in the same social circles and know each other, perhaps quite well.

Love the way people are desperately, FITZmasly, trying to make something out of it--like Bill and Loretta would "conspire" while Loretta's husband sits off to the side playing Candy Crush, or something!

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
9. Is that even legal? Shouldn't Trey Gowdy
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 02:22 AM
Jun 2016

investigate and get to the bottom of this. It might go full Benghazi!!

MADem

(135,425 posts)
11. Quick--someone appropriate seven million bucks!
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 02:23 AM
Jun 2016

Then call Loretta in and grill her to no good effect for 12 hours!

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
31. Yep. The burn the village to save it scenario.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:33 PM
Jun 2016

You have to admit, though...they're being very clever since the new ToS went into effect.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
32. they can be as clever as they want but SPOILER ALERT: hillary won. Hillary will win in Nov.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:34 PM
Jun 2016

no matter what stupid new controversy they drum up/

Wounded Bear

(58,647 posts)
25. Saw a reference to this on another board...
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:21 PM
Jun 2016

I guess it was this, anyway. Was just typical RW vague innuendo, which softly screams "AFFAIR! BILL'S AT IT AGAIN!!!!"

Bunch of grade school crap.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
37. Seeing as Loretta's husband was RIGHT THERE, ya gotta give Bill props for sheer
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 02:25 PM
Jun 2016

boldness-LOL!

Of course, that small but important fact ruins the narrative!!

OnDoutside

(19,954 posts)
16. Scarborough and Brzezinski venting their Anti-Clinton spleen as usual on Morning Joe, and no one
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 06:58 AM
Jun 2016

took them up on it.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
17. Seems like poor judgment on Lynch's part to meet ...
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 08:22 AM
Jun 2016

... with the spouse of someone the DOJ is investigating.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
18. Must be recused from decision making
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 08:42 AM
Jun 2016

And...if she didnt instantaneously disclose

Obama needs to consider removing her

Taint

 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
34. Remember when there was something about Clarence Thomas and his wife
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 02:01 PM
Jun 2016

and her relation to some org that had a case before the court?

The calls for his recusal were based on the possibility of influence by his wife. It didn't matter that everyone knew how he was going to vote it's the idea that he wouldn't be impartial that mattered.

It happened with Kagan and the Obamacare case too

No one has questioned her ethics, that I'm aware of, but the appearance this projects doesn't look good



MADem

(135,425 posts)
38. It wasn't a "meeting." No one had it on their calendar.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 02:27 PM
Jun 2016

It was an "Oh wow, Loretta and her husband are waiting to take off, too? Let me go on over and say 'Hi!'"

Pure chance and happenstance--and last I checked, HE wasn't under investigation.

How much colluding they did with Loretta's husband RIGHT THERE is a bit of a leap, too.

Response to MADem (Reply #38)

Loki

(3,825 posts)
22. And, since you posted this,
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 11:38 AM
Jun 2016

what are you insinuating? Are they supposed to speak together in public, or would it be safer for them to speak in a private area where they can be protected? Really CNN, the home of a once great news network that now hires abusers of women. The Criminally Nefarious Network. Crap in, crap out.

Loki

(3,825 posts)
40. Oh, I see.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 02:59 PM
Jun 2016

Loretta is giving the Clinton's a heads up on the FBI investigation. We always attribute the worst possible outcomes, don't we? I find her to be a very honorable government representative. Apparently some want to believe differently. Ready to believe the worst.

deathrind

(1,786 posts)
29. True
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:26 PM
Jun 2016

As a Det. friend likes to say.

The first coincidence is suspicious...

The second coincidence is evidence...

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
33. There's no info to think it could be a coincidence.
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:49 PM
Jun 2016

Why was Bill in Arizona? Why was Loretta there as well? It seems odd that their paths would intersect at an airport in the boondocks.

Zen Democrat

(5,901 posts)
36. Are you kidding? Bill knows better than that. Lynch is over the entire FBI investigation of Hillary
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 02:23 PM
Jun 2016

She should never have had a private conversation with Bill. It's called propriety and ethics.

renate

(13,776 posts)
43. I do wish Bill would just sit in a corner till the election
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 04:38 PM
Jun 2016

He may be super smart and super charming and everything, but he has very bad judgement. As a lawyer he should have known better than to ask to meet with her (and she should have known better than to agree, to be fair) and now the Republicans have something new to light their hair on fire about. And now, once again, Hillary has to defend herself against something he did.

kacekwl

(7,016 posts)
44. The Clintons more than anyone
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 04:59 PM
Jun 2016

should know how this looks and is a STUPID move wherever the reason.

tavernier

(12,380 posts)
45. He said hello in the airplane
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 05:01 PM
Jun 2016

and they exchanged chit chat about the grandkids. He just had a new one, so I'm sure she asked. All of this is per her.

What am I missing here?

renate

(13,776 posts)
46. appearances
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 05:57 PM
Jun 2016

It was a private meeting, so there's no way to contradict Republican claims that they talked about the FBI investigation. I'm sure they didn't... well, it's Bill, so who knows, but I hope and assume that they didn't. But it certainly doesn't look good.

Plus, even if it was only a friendly conversation about grandkids, that's not great. Talking about personal things with someone makes most people feel more warmly towards that person.

I think most lawyers are saying that was a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad idea for him to create even the appearance of favoritism or any kind of personal relationship. And I think they're right.

Bill just has no restraining bolt.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bill Clinton and AG Loret...