Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:55 PM Jul 2016

A curveball in Trump’s Veep search: He’s seriously considering a retired general

Source: The Washington Post

By Robert Costa July 9 at 12:49 PM

After weeks of focusing on a group of current and former elected officials in his search for a running mate, Donald Trump is increasingly intrigued by the idea of tapping retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn in order to project strength and know-how on national security, according to four people familiar with the vetting process.

Flynn, 57, a registered Democrat but fierce critic of President Obama, previously ran the Defense Intelligence Agency.

-snip-

The turn toward a military figure is being driven by Trump himself rather than by his advisers, the people said, and comes as the real estate mogul is telling his friends that national unrest may demand a “tough and steady” presence alongside him on the ticket.

In Flynn, they added, Trump believes he would have a partner whom he trusts, based on their close working relationship over the course of the campaign on policy. And he likes the image of a businessman and a general coming to Washington as outsiders.

-snip-

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/07/09/a-curveball-in-trumps-veep-search-hes-seriously-considering-a-retired-general/?postshare=6911468082970714&tid=ss_tw

53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A curveball in Trump’s Veep search: He’s seriously considering a retired general (Original Post) DonViejo Jul 2016 OP
or not, considering that this is Robert Costa Mass Jul 2016 #1
By his standards, this would not be a bad pick Cosmocat Jul 2016 #2
He's a loose cannon with a loose mouth just like Trump, praising Putin, etc. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #19
possibly Cosmocat Jul 2016 #43
Flynn's sort of an anti-Obama hack, and did not leave DIA on good terms emulatorloo Jul 2016 #3
It's very hard to take the WaPost seriously on such things after this cycle in which Bluenorthwest Jul 2016 #4
Then try reading Politico.... DonViejo Jul 2016 #6
Who am I? Why am I here? andym Jul 2016 #5
Stockdale redux. My first thought too. nt TeamPooka Jul 2016 #10
I heard he was chummy with Newt. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2016 #7
tRump: "I watch the generals on the shows"... I guess he actually has now met one. LOL winstars Jul 2016 #8
Proceed.... Wounded Bear Jul 2016 #9
Though apparently they got elected... nt MisterFred Jul 2016 #36
If Flynn turns out to be Trump's running mate, Hillary will need Tulsi Gabbard. forest444 Jul 2016 #11
Wall Street Wall Street Wall Street...bla bla bla. Please change the recording. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #16
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #20
It's not really a recording when... Chan790 Jul 2016 #42
You've got a real point there, forest444. We've all been likely to expect them every 4 years. n/t Judi Lynn Jul 2016 #40
We don't need to add an Islamaphobe to our ticket geek tragedy Jul 2016 #46
Where would you get the impression Tulsi Gabbard is an Islamophobic bigot? Judi Lynn Jul 2016 #48
Here geek tragedy Jul 2016 #49
Hmmmmm. That's quite a load to see all at once. Had never heard a peep about any of it earlier. Judi Lynn Jul 2016 #50
Cheers nt geek tragedy Jul 2016 #51
Nobody wants to run w/Trump Botany Jul 2016 #12
"Donald Trump is increasingly intrigued..." chapdrum Jul 2016 #13
IMHO If this happens it's because Newt turned him down NWCorona Jul 2016 #14
No way Newt would turn down even a remote chance to moonscape Jul 2016 #33
Agreed! NWCorona Jul 2016 #34
Not surprising really Mz Pip Jul 2016 #15
Flynn was with Huckabee before he jointed team trump Charlie Brown Jul 2016 #17
Wes Clark is probably an exception to that. RBInMaine Jul 2016 #21
Wesley Clark would be a very good VP pick. roamer65 Jul 2016 #23
"they don't know how to speak, debate, etc. " former9thward Jul 2016 #29
Ok, I corrected it. Charlie Brown Jul 2016 #35
If military experience was important to voters stopbush Jul 2016 #18
most generals support Clinton so it wouldn't really matter JI7 Jul 2016 #22
Trump said he has two generals on his 10-person VP short list red dog 1 Jul 2016 #24
Mills GeorgeGist Jul 2016 #26
General Mills? red dog 1 Jul 2016 #28
Dollar truthisfreedom Jul 2016 #30
No one knew who Sarah Palin was Cosmocat Jul 2016 #45
I'd be thrilled with that Happyhippychick Jul 2016 #25
I was kind of hoping that he would pick Allen West. Tal Vez Jul 2016 #27
Let us know pressbox69 Jul 2016 #31
Isn't That what Bill Kristol Wants? Night Watchman Jul 2016 #32
Generals are not outsiders. lastlib Jul 2016 #37
I think it would be smart for him to pick a non-politician. David__77 Jul 2016 #38
I agree Cosmocat Jul 2016 #44
George Wallace picked Curtis LeMay. rug Jul 2016 #39
exactly dembotoz Jul 2016 #41
Flynn is an explicit Islamaphobic bigot who has advocated geek tragedy Jul 2016 #47
had it not been for that one little incident, Petraeus would have been way up there. rurallib Jul 2016 #52
The betting markets aren't buying it Doctor Jack Jul 2016 #53

Mass

(27,315 posts)
1. or not, considering that this is Robert Costa
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 01:59 PM
Jul 2016

So it may be pure BS that has been fed to Costa to cover whoever he wants. Who knows?

This said, if it is Flynn, expect the GOP to explode completely, and the guy is a perfect racist (which some may not like at all)

Cosmocat

(14,559 posts)
2. By his standards, this would not be a bad pick
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 02:06 PM
Jul 2016

It would help firm up frayed Rs who might not be in his pocket, but are looking for a reason to vote for him/against Hillary.

Would probably be viewed favorable by the media.

emulatorloo

(44,066 posts)
3. Flynn's sort of an anti-Obama hack, and did not leave DIA on good terms
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 02:08 PM
Jul 2016

Unfortunate Costa didn't do any more research.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
4. It's very hard to take the WaPost seriously on such things after this cycle in which
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 02:09 PM
Jul 2016

they just made shit up to attack the candidate they did not like. I consider it to be a very biased if not bigoted paper. They might just be lax and lazy but they look pernicious to me.

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
6. Then try reading Politico....
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 02:14 PM
Jul 2016
Trump's favorite general

Michael Flynn is more than a valued adviser to the presumptive GOP nominee. He's also a potential VP candidate.

By Bryan Bender and Shane Goldmacher

07/08/16 05:51 AM EDT



Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/donald-trump-general-michael-flynn-vp-225253#ixzz4Dw8CSWUJ

forest444

(5,902 posts)
11. If Flynn turns out to be Trump's running mate, Hillary will need Tulsi Gabbard.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 02:36 PM
Jul 2016

I realize Wall Street is pressuring her to choose a TPPer like Tim Kaine or Joaquín Castro; but Hillary will need her military chops, as well as her almost unique ability to unify the party.

Flynn, moreover, shouldn't be underestimated - especially if some incident along the lines of the USS Cole bombing happens to take place in (of course) October.

Response to RBInMaine (Reply #16)

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
42. It's not really a recording when...
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 07:37 AM
Jul 2016

there has been at least one article a day for the last two weeks which includes some variation on the theme of "Wall Street's insiders and power-brokers are saying that unless Clinton chooses Kaine, they will cut off the money they have pledged to donate to her general election campaign." in a major US news-publication.

Don't blame us for it if that's what Wall St. is actually saying.

Personally, as no great fan or supporter of Hillary holding my nose to vote for her in 2016 and fairly-committed to pushing to see her primaried out of office for 2020, it would improve my opinion of her dramatically (enough to actually consider supporting her in 2020) if she'd explicitly-state that Kaine is no longer in consideration solely because Wall St. can bugger off if they think they can bully her. It would set a good precedent that she will not be pushed or bullied by special interests and that doing so will result in whatever these interests want being burned to ashes. It would end the allegations that she's beholden to all those interests ahead of the American public, the Democratic party and the American left-of-center.

1.) No Kaine.
2.) Explicitly because that's who the assholes want.
3.) Because Hillary won't be threatened or bullied.

Judi Lynn

(160,450 posts)
48. Where would you get the impression Tulsi Gabbard is an Islamophobic bigot?
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 09:21 AM
Jul 2016

Have absolutely NEVER heard that about this completely exceptional person.

Judi Lynn

(160,450 posts)
50. Hmmmmm. That's quite a load to see all at once. Had never heard a peep about any of it earlier.
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 10:00 AM
Jul 2016

Anyone who would even consider agreeing with Bill Maher on his grotesque Islamophobic ravings is not entirely OK, after all. Never, never would have guessed.

Sheldon Adelson. Jesus.

Never would have guessed. Thanks for the info. I am disappointed. Hope she rethinks her position as soon as she can wake up.

Botany

(70,447 posts)
12. Nobody wants to run w/Trump
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 02:45 PM
Jul 2016

And if the General cares about his image or reputation he will not run w/Trump either.

 

chapdrum

(930 posts)
13. "Donald Trump is increasingly intrigued..."
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 02:50 PM
Jul 2016

Thank you Washington Post for the helpful color commentary.

Mz Pip

(27,431 posts)
15. Not surprising really
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 02:59 PM
Jul 2016

I've always thought he'd go for some retired military person. Superficially, it adds some foreign policy and national security creeds to the ticket.

Charlie Brown

(2,797 posts)
17. Flynn was with Huckabee before he jointed team trump
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:34 PM
Jul 2016

That doesn't give him a lot of credibility as a sane, sensible voice.

Beyond that, military people are great candidates. They know how to speak, debate, etc. superlatively.

Does anyone remember Stockdale, that Admiral who ran with Perot in '92? Sheesh.

former9thward

(31,940 posts)
29. "they don't know how to speak, debate, etc. "
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 05:01 PM
Jul 2016

Maybe they need someone to feed them baby food and change their diapers. Your insult of people in the military is noted.

red dog 1

(27,771 posts)
24. Trump said he has two generals on his 10-person VP short list
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 03:59 PM
Jul 2016

according to an article posted yesterday on BBC.com

From the article, about Flynn:
"A shoot-from-the-hip outsider with a penchant for questioning authority might not be the best way to complement Trump...And while Flynn is developing a loyal following, he has no name recognition...There's also no way of knowing how effective he'd be on the stump."
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-36678388


(I wonder who the other general is)

Cosmocat

(14,559 posts)
45. No one knew who Sarah Palin was
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 08:33 AM
Jul 2016

before McCain picked her.

But, the Rs and the "liberal media" absolutely FAWNED over her for a month or so until it became obvious to the point of not being able to deny she was a moron the likes of which we had not seen in politics (pre trump).

The same thing WILL happen if this guy is the pick. Rs will get all moist in the groin over him, the media will say how great of a pick it is, and he will spun BIG time to try to get Trump into the game.

Now, how he holds up over time will be the question, but honestly, if he was general, he can't possibly be Palin bad.

I am not saying it means trump wins the election because of it, but given how ridiculously stupid Trump is, this would be a real solid pick by his standards.

 

Night Watchman

(743 posts)
32. Isn't That what Bill Kristol Wants?
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 05:34 PM
Jul 2016

Hey, Trump should do whatever Kristol says, since Bill has never been right about anything!

lastlib

(23,155 posts)
37. Generals are not outsiders.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 08:46 PM
Jul 2016

They don't get those stars by not playing the political games that make much of Washington what it is. And to give the military more political power than it has now is a serious recipe for disaster. As electing Trump in itself would be.

David__77

(23,334 posts)
38. I think it would be smart for him to pick a non-politician.
Sat Jul 9, 2016, 08:50 PM
Jul 2016

A general would be a smart pick, because it might be seen as politically more difficult to make the case that the person cannot handle foreign affairs and defense. If Trump picks a Republican politician as his running mate, he will be more easily ran against with a sort of standard anti-Republican campaign, in my opinion.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
47. Flynn is an explicit Islamaphobic bigot who has advocated
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 08:38 AM
Jul 2016

Dresden-style bombing campaigns as well as re-occupying Iraq and invading Syria.

And he's very possibly on Putin's payroll.

Doctor Jack

(3,072 posts)
53. The betting markets aren't buying it
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 12:05 PM
Jul 2016

They have him placed at the 8th most likely choice, behind several people that already said they don't want the job.

The problem with this guy is that he is pro-gay marriage, pro-choice, and as of a year ago, was a registered democrat. News that he is on Trump's shortlist has only been floating around for 1 day and already the media is finding information that will end up being a massive headache for the republicans. There is no way the republicans let him on the ticket.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»A curveball in Trump’s Ve...