Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,511 posts)
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 06:34 PM Jul 2016

Police may change tactics at protests after Dallas shooting

Source: Associated Press

Police may change tactics at protests after Dallas shooting

Jeff Baenen, Associated Press

Updated 5:19 pm, Sunday, July 10, 2016

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — In the wake of protests in Ferguson, Missouri, where authorities were criticized for what some called heavy-handed tactics against demonstrators, many departments took a more restrained approach.

Now, after the shooting deaths of five officers at a Dallas protest decrying last week's police killings of two more black men, some experts are suggesting it's possible the pendulum could swing from hugs back to flash-bang grenades and mass arrests.

After days of peaceful protests in St. Paul, officers in riot gear met protesters who blocked Interstate 94 late Saturday in the biggest confrontation between police and demonstrators since an officer fatally shot a black man during a suburban Twin Cities traffic stop last week. About 100 people were arrested — half during the highway standoff and the other half early Sunday in another part of St. Paul — and 21 St. Paul police officers and six state troopers were hurt. Police Chief Todd Axtell called the pelting of officers with rocks, bottles, firecrackers and other objects "a disgrace."

Police used smoke bombs to clear the crowd of more than 200 people blocking the interstate. It was a contrast to their approach at protests outside the governor's mansion in the wake of motorist Philando Castile's police shooting death Wednesday in the suburb of Falcon Heights. Gov. Mark Dayton, a Democrat, has praised the calmer demonstrations outside his home and said he won't try to have people removed.


Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/texas/article/Police-may-change-tactics-at-protests-after-8350946.php

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

christx30

(6,241 posts)
3. Probably more like
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 06:41 PM
Jul 2016

"Get off the highway. You have 2 minutes to comply." Follow it up with tear gas, bean bag rounds, arrests.

WHEN CRABS ROAR

(3,813 posts)
8. The cops in this country have been pointing weapons
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 07:58 PM
Jul 2016

at and killing our citizens for well over two centuries and they are unlikely to change anytime soon.

They are obsessed with the rule of law and maintaining the status quo at all costs.

The question is, who is the enemy?

 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
19. No Truth to that statement
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 03:53 PM
Jul 2016

Prior to 1838, you had the "Watch" "Constables" and "Sheriff Deputies". Each has their specific role. The "Watch" was an urban duty, done by volunteers who had no power other then as a ordinary citizen. They checked doors to make sure they were locked and made sure the people on the streets had legitimate reasons to be on the street after dusk, but that was it.

Constables were tied in with Justice of the Peaces, Constables would arrest people once a warrant was issued, but primary job was to serve papers involved in Civil Litigation in front of the Justice of the Peace.

Sheriff Deputies, did the same role as Constables but for Common Pleas Courts.

Boston was the first US City to form a "Police force" in 1838. US police forces were modeled after the then new Police Force in London England (which in turn was model after the Police Force of France, a forced created to suppress dissent in France under the Kings of France in the 1700s).

Now, in the South, you had the "Sheriff's Patrol", Technically this existed in the North, but no one really did it in the North but was tied in with Militia Duties in both North and South. It was UNPAID AND MANDATORY DUTY for any white male. Every white male had to be a member of a "Patrol" that guarded some point (generally an intersection) and checked to make sure anyone crossing that intersection, at night, had a reason to do so. In the north, the main thrust was membership and duties in the Militia, thus during the Colonial time period the New England Militia was the best Militia in the world (and up to the standards of many regular army formations). The Sheriff Patrol was an afterthought that most people just dismissed, it existed on paper but it was rare to set up actual Sheriff's patrols.

On the contrary, in the South, the Militia did little actual drilling, for the main thrust was to find out when you were to do your Sheriff's Patrol. In the South these tended to be called "Slave Patrols" for the main thrust was to prevent any slave from escaping OR forming a Slave revolt. Thus the Militia of the South during the Revolution was considered so bad that Northern Generals had to remind each other of how bad they were compared to the New England Militia.

On the other hand, the attitude that a white man could kill a black man was part of the South's Sheriff's Patrol. It was expected to be done every so often and a system of reimbursement to the owner of the slave was part of the system (Thus the actual killer of a slave did not have to pay for the slave NOR show that he had cause to kill the slave, the killer received no punishment and the owner of the slave was paid the value of the slave).

The key to the above was NONE OF THE ABOVE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS WERE PAID TO DO THEIR JOBS. Constables and Sheriff's deputies were paid on a fee for service basis, but that was the only pay made to these law enforcement officers. During actual riots (and slave revolts) it was the Militia that put them down, not the Constables, Members of the Watch or Sheriff's Deputies.

Just pointing out it will have to be 2038 before we have two centuries of police work in the US and thus as of today we have had less then two centuries of police, let alone police pointing guns at people.

More on the history of the Police:

http://plsonline.eku.edu/insidelook/history-policing-united-states-part-1

More than crime, modern police forces in the United States emerged as a response to "disorder." What constitutes social and public order depends largely on who is defining those terms, and in the cities of 19th century America they were defined by the mercantile interests, who through taxes and political influence supported the development of bureaucratic policing institutions. These economic interests had a greater interest in social control than crime control. Private and for profit policing was too disorganized and too crime-specific in form to fulfill these needs. The emerging commercial elites needed a mechanism to insure a stable and orderly work force, a stable and orderly environment for the conduct of business, and the maintenance of what they referred to as the "collective good" (Spitzer and Scull 1977). These mercantile interests also wanted to divest themselves of the cost of protecting their own enterprises, transferring those costs from the private sector to the state.


Please note a lot of City Police Forces like tracing themselves to the "Watch" but "Watch" never had the power of arrest other then as a citizen (A citizen arrest), thus you read that Philadelphia had a police force in 1751, but in reality did not have a Police Force till 1855.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police#Early_modern_policing

Now, private police forces did exist in the 1800s, the most infamous was the Pennsylvania "Coal and Iron Police". It has been called the only true terrorist group ever to exist in the US.

1915 testimony of the PA State Police and the Coal and Iron Police:

http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5661

http://home.earthlink.net/~hilltj/ColverPolice.html

ACLU report of 1928 about the Coal and Iron Police:

http://debs.indstate.edu/a505s5_1928.pdf

Just a comment that the US had no "Police" till 1838 and thus the US has NOT had police "for well over two centuries" and thus the Police could NOT have "been pointing weapons at and killing our citizens for well over two centuries". Not that the police have not done so since 1838, that is true, but that is LESS THEN TWO CENTURIES.

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
2. There should be rules of engagement for protesters and cops
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 06:39 PM
Jul 2016

*No throwing things
*No spitting at cops
*No blocking the freeway
*No vandalism with anything other than chalk
*No assaulting police or anyone else

If protesters follow these rules, the cops stay cool, leave the riot gear off, and don't arrest anyone.

 

Chakab

(1,727 posts)
13. From what I understand, none of the behavior that you're describing happened in Dallas. The problem
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 08:42 PM
Jul 2016

was with the murderous asshole who had access to military grade weaponry and body armor as a civilian.

But they're not going to crack down on that shit, so I guess the next best option is try to limit free speech and the freedom to assemble.

Jopin Klobe

(779 posts)
6. Here's how far the "pendulum" can go ...
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 07:24 PM
Jul 2016


... Kent State ... it's happened before ...

... and without any prudent, mature leaders for this country ...

... it will happen again ...

Locrian

(4,522 posts)
14. nah - too difficult
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 08:43 PM
Jul 2016

NOBODY is going to look at economics and challenge the status quo of unregulated capitalism and the impact on communities.

So now they can talk "tactics" and strategy and avoid any analysis of root cause.

 

Chakab

(1,727 posts)
12. This doesn't even make any sense. It was a peaceful protest. The protesters weren't the problem here
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 08:40 PM
Jul 2016

unless they're blaming them for exercising their first amendment rights.

tclambert

(11,085 posts)
18. I presume you mean like this:
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 01:48 PM
Jul 2016




What Donald Trump would call "the good old days." I'm sure his formula for "making America great again" includes dogs and firehoses.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Police may change tactics...