Sanders says leaked DNC emails don't change his support for Clinton
Source: The Hill
Bernie Sanders said he will still support Hillary Clinton for president despite leaked emails that showed Democratic Party leaders privately planned to undermine his presidential campaign.
"No, no, no," Sanders said in response to a question on NBC's "Meet the Press" about whether the emails affect his support of the presumptive Democratic nominee. "We are going to do everything we can to protect working families in this country. What a campaign is about is not about Hillary Clinton, it's not about Donald Trump. It's about the people of this country."
Sanders called Clinton, whom he formally endorsed earlier this month, a "far, far superior candidate" to Trump. "We're going to focus on defeating the worst Republican candidate I've seen in a lifetime. We've got to elect Secretary Clinton."
Emails leaked Friday by WikiLeaks reignited talks of party favoritism for Clinton just ahead of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia next week. In one May 21 email, DNC press secretary Mark Paustenbach writes to communications director Luis Miranda about planting a narrative to the media that Sanderss campaign was a mess.
###
Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/289010-sanders-says-dnc-email-leak-doesnt-change-his-support-for
jonno99
(2,620 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)annavictorious
(934 posts)If DWS were to be fired, wouldn't it be Obama doing the firing?
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Hillary is our candidate, and we look to her for leadership of the political process.
This is an opportunity for her to show the doubters that she can be an ethical leader.
calimary
(81,194 posts)The highest-ranking individual in the party IS the leader of the party, as I understand it. In our case, we have a STILL-sitting President, and it's rather difficult to imagine anybody more high-ranking in our party than he is.
Donald Trump is now the head of the GOP because he's now the official GOP nominee. Just as Mitt Romney was, four years ago at approximately the same time. John McCain was NOT, because at that point, we were still blighted by a CON in the White House, and like it or not, that individual was the party leader.
cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)any cleaning.
Clinton will have enough of a problem doing more important things like nominating new SCOTUS judges and hopefully finally cleaning up the remaining mess from the Bush administration that Barack was unable to clean because of Republican obstruction.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)to Barack who will have the time to deal with it once he is no longer president.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)and actually do some pragmatic delegating.
Orrex
(63,199 posts)Bravo, Senator.
A lesser figure might have taken this opportunity for a bit of self-serving grandstanding, but Sanders' response is thoughtful and constructive.
obamanut2012
(26,064 posts)malthaussen
(17,184 posts)The man is not a cretin.
-- Mal
michaz
(1,352 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)monmouth4
(9,694 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Where is Crow City? Not being cheeky, but I work in a city where the crow (bird) population is huge and has been featured in National Geographic. I lived there until 6 months ago but moved to the country where there are far more deer than crow.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Just guessing, but you're in favor of the Tubman Twenty, too?
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Urchin
(248 posts)But Hillary seems willing enough to benefit from it. Has she complained about the DNC acting unfairly?
Bernie, I bet, would refuse the nomination had Hillary been cheated out of it by the DNC.
bekkilyn
(454 posts)And why I voted for Bernie in the primaries. He upholds his convictions and yet does what he says he will do. I voted for Bernie because I support his goals, but if Hillary ends up being the person who meets some of those goals, then that's fine. It's not about Bernie or Hillary, but about what they want to do for the country. It really doesn't matter who does it as long as it gets done. The Democrat platform is stronger now because of both of them.
I do like that Bernie has requested that Debbie Wasserman Schultz step down. She's been to the DNC what Arne Duncan has been to education.
Raspol
(20 posts)and Trump.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)He understands that the job at hand is to do EVERYTHING to stop Trump, one of the biggest dangers to our Democracy in my lifetime.
We have enough time later to purge the Democratic Party of all the underhanded, third-way "moderate" DINO's.
turbinetree
(24,688 posts)and control of the Congress-------------------get it , got it
Democracy is not a spectator sport get involved----------------tag your it------------------Bernie Sanders to Thom Hartmann
Honk------------------for a political revolution
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)He also knows that division in a most important election smells of defeat.
Kathy M
(1,242 posts)Democrats need to stick together to defeat Republicans and their divisive tactics .
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)Kare no kokoro o hanashimasu 彼の心を話します
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)ほんと です よ もちろん
wisteria
(19,581 posts)The past is the past. The time has come to elect Hillary Clinton and defeat Donald Trump.
Chakaconcarne
(2,439 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Vinca
(50,255 posts)The general election is between a sane candidate and one who is mad as a hatter. Even if you despise Hillary with every fiber of your being, the thought of enabling Trump by not voting for her is totally out of the question.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)Sanders called Clinton, whom he formally endorsed earlier this month, a "far, far superior candidate" to Trump. "We're going to focus on defeating the worst Republican candidate I've seen in a lifetime. We've got to elect Secretary Clinton."
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)I believed some of the claims later in the primaries that he was full of himself or wanted to make this all about him. I was dead wrong. He's a great guy and might be better than we deserve.
cannabis_flower
(3,764 posts)I'm ready to move on and support Bernie.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, however needs to go. She needs to lose the chairmanship of the DNC and she needs to lose her seat in the House.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)The relevance is not whether Sanders is publicly personally offended. It's whether the DNC conducted itself according to its own rules and its stated course of action.
Which it appears it did not.
PoliticalMalcontent
(449 posts)I think we definitely missed out on a very thoughtful, PRAGMATIC, individual with Sanders. I'm going to love and follow his lead for the rest of his days in politics.
videohead5
(2,171 posts)I really did not care if he was or was not but no one used it against Bernie... but I guarantee you Trump would have.the Rthugs would have broadcast it from coast to coast.
wryter2000
(46,032 posts)Makes you wonder if the hangers-on ever really supported him or had a very different agenda.
By this I don't mean the huge majority who now back Hillary.