Sanders delegates exploring challenge of Kaine selection
Source: Politico
PHILADELPHIA Supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders are moving toward a challenge of Sen. Tim Kaines selection as presumptive vice presidential nominee, accusing Hillary Clinton of failing to roll back some of the worst neo-liberal policies with her choice of running mate.
Theres serious interest right now and exploration as we speak of a formal challenge, Norman Solomon, a California delegate and national coordinator for the Bernie Delegates Network, said at a news conference Monday. The network represents about 1,250 of the 1,900 delegates that have pledged support for Sanders.
Kaines selection riled Sanders supporters, who accuse the Virginia Democrat of being too closely tied to Wall Street and fault him for his past strong support for trade deals.
This past weekend, a Kaine spokeswoman confirmed the senators opposition to the Trans-Pacific Partnership in its current form, reflecting the same position as Clinton on the pending deal.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/tim-kaine-vp-challenge-convention-226125
Shouldn't the candidate be able to choose their own VP?
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)That is why they are doing it.
RandySF
(58,706 posts)It's well within the rules to call a vote.
Blue State Bandit
(2,122 posts)I can tell you flat out, it's the ONLY WAY to pull this back. There is too much animosity and mistrust, and there is more outrage to come. A peace offering would go a long way, and give a big chunk of Berners some skin in the game. HRC may not get all Bernie's supporters, but you may keep them from actively organizing against her. Give them something and maybe they will just stay home. Cast them out and ridicule them for their righteous indignation, and they will rush into the Green Party like a tsunami and Hillary will lose.
I was in Philly and watched Jill convert Berners everywhere she goes. She'll be on that debate stage, and will suck the Dem vote to the bone if nothing is done... here and now.
I'm not here promoting another candidate v/ Clinton, I'm just offering some advice across the battle line.
Just remember, and I'm not saying this to you in particular, a respected Berner may come out for HRC in November (+1), disaffected Berner may stay home (-1), but an insulted Berner has a multiplying effect (x?), and maybe we can get through this.
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)That Sanders supporters should chose the VP?
David__77
(23,367 posts)I think the convention delegates choose the VP. I would be surprised if this is someone other than the person indicated by the presidential nominee. In the olden days, I think that these things were more fluid.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)angstlessk
(11,862 posts)after all they shut down the mics of his dissenters
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)They're doing EXACTLY what he loves.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)This is a very few vocal anti-Democrat whiners from the "Not Hillary" Party trying to take over the process & make it easier for Donald Trump to win. They should be disavowed by Bernie Sanders, stripped of their credentials & booted from the convention. They can go fuck themselves.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)MBS
(9,688 posts)stopbush
(24,395 posts)on national primetime TV than it is to have it voted down in a back room?
OK. Whatever floats your boat.
C_U_L8R
(44,997 posts)Just because you played doesn't mean you win a prize.
We love you and we love Bernie too. Please let's work
together on what matters.
George II
(67,782 posts)markj757
(194 posts)If they mount a challenge, they are just as frustrated as I am, and I'm not even a Bernie supporter.
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)markj757
(194 posts)she makes choices that just makes it difficult for me to support her, unless I'm backed into a corner and don't have a choice.
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)markj757
(194 posts)But I do think he would have been an excellent VP selection for Warren if she had run and won the nomination.
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)markj757
(194 posts)and it makes it that much harder for them to unite and move forward. I was a reluctant Hillary supporter, and it was hard for me to accept she didn't pick Warren to give some balance to the ticket, and show the millions of Bernie supporters I heard your voices. I think before you reach out to white men, you need to make sure you can excite your base first, because that's where you are going to lose when they don't show up to vote. And if she gets a more moderate Republican in 4 yrs like Kasich, she is going to be a one term President. Trump is a gift to the Democratic Party and she still may have a hard time beating him because of her VP choice.
comradebillyboy
(10,143 posts)Clinton or her supporters wanted. The winner gets to pick her running mate and not be saddled with the choice of disgruntled losers.
markj757
(194 posts)so I won't disagree with that point.
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)To win general national elections, I believe it is wise to pivot to the middle. You disagree and call her decision " tone deaf ". I believe her hearing, instincts and advise are spot on. Don the Con and his followers would have loved for her to choose someone more to the left IMHO.
markj757
(194 posts)without the excitement from the base and 46% of primary voters who voted for Bernie.
rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)markj757
(194 posts)and if the Republicans come to their senses in 4 yrs, and nominates someone like Kasich, Romeny, or Jeb Bush, Hillary will be in trouble if she wins this election.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)I take it you are aware that Bernie is NOT the Dem nominee, and he and his supporters are owed nothing.
I also take it you're aware that "the base" is comprised of those who reliably vote Democratic in every election, and do not withhold their votes contingent on having their demands met.
It's hard for you to accept that she didn't pick Warren? Why should she? Bernie supporters threw Warren under the bus months ago when she didn't endorse Bernie before the Massachusetts primary. They used that bus to run over her yet again when she campaigned with HRC - and the myth that choosing Warren as a VP would assuage the BS supporters went under that same bus with her.
The "base" IS excited. The "base" voted for HRC in the primaries, and made her the nominee. The "base" will show up in November to elect HRC as the next POTUS.
The "base" does not say, "I will only vote for the Dem, if the Dem does what I want."
markj757
(194 posts)but I agree, Bernie is not the nominee and Hillary has a right to pick whoever she chooses.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... that the "liberal base" of the Party is something different than "the base" of the Party, you obviously haven't been paying attention.
The "base" is Democrats who support the Party. That includes liberals, far-leftists, middle-of-the-roaders, conservative Dems, progressive Dems - Dems of all stripes.
Like it or not, THAT is "the base". Always has been, always will be.
If you want to keep pretending that "certain Dems" waffle in their Party allegiance depending on what labels are applied to them, feel free to do so. But the fact remains that "the base" is consistently loyal to the Party - which is why they're called "the base".
Laser102
(816 posts)markj757
(194 posts)I'm sure Obama was a big Kaine supporter as well.
rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)markj757
(194 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)It seemed necessary.
Democat
(11,617 posts)About Trump not getting a convention bounce perhaps?
sofa king
(10,857 posts)still_one
(92,116 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Good luck finding one!
Native
(5,939 posts)REALforever
(69 posts)Can we ever get to THE ISSUES?
Kablooie
(18,625 posts)You may disagree strongly with a lot of decisions and choices but if you cause confusion and chaos you may be giving the election to Trump.
If Clinton wins you can continue to fight for what you believe in while she's president and in another 4 years try elect someone more sympathetic to your views.
If Trump wins, the 2020 election could have so many new issues that need urgent addressing that your current priorities will seem small potatoes and be lost in the melee.
Who knows, if Trump has his way the Constitution and the whole structure of our democratic process could be collapsing and you'd never get a chance to change things again.
It would be prudent to bite your tongue right now until we get past this deadly Trump hump.
LisaM
(27,800 posts)Didn't they listen to his speech the other day?
olddad56
(5,732 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)latino children are speaking ,,,,,, geeez. Real Classy!
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Sanders LOST. They don't get to decide Hillary's VP.
The nerve of these people!!!!
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)on their proudest day. Ridiculous.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)These fools are trying to indirectly guarantee that Trump is elected. Are they so damn stupid not to be afraid of this fascist, dictator wannabe????????
I have disliked plenty of Republicans, but I am actually afraid of what Trump would do to the nation if he were to become president.
I blame Sanders for the whole mess. In 2008, despite Obama winning by a very small margin, Hillary did the classy thing by releasing her delegates so that Obama could be nominated by acclamation. Sanders promised a fight all the way to the convention and wouldn't even endorse Hillary until recently. This only encouraged his delegates to act up.
DinahMoeHum
(21,783 posts)n/t
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)It will be another futile effort
RandySF
(58,706 posts)There's nothing wrong with that.
awake
(3,226 posts)Do belive in their Bull Sh*t
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)They might as well be booing. Not going to fall for 'legitimate' arguments. This is all bullshit.
epreic01
(12 posts)When I was young I was playing a board game with a friend. I won. He flipped the board over and said I cheated. I didn't.
He is on Facebook insisting Bernie or Bust. Some things never change.
niyad
(113,229 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Warren, Booker and Sheerod Brown would be replaced by Republican Governors. What good is the presidency if the Senate and the House are both controlled by Republicans ?
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)Sen. Sanders took the high road. He knows that not winning California was the writing on the wall. The DNC really had no effect. I believe most everyone is familiar with Bernie, especially here.
Maybe it was the issues which decided it. What a concept.
These protesters are really pissing me off. They are making headlines for the wrong reasons.
BigDemVoter
(4,149 posts)ENOUGH. First of all, the choice of VP amounts to a bunch of hooey as far as what the role involves. It's the US version of royalty cutting ribbons, basically. And YES, the candidate chooses his/her VP.
But let's not give the fucking republicans what they want by making a cluster fuck out of this entire thing. Yes, I voted for Bernie. And yes, I am fucking pissed off, but let's give this a break, please. All we need to do is to start a goddamned fight right now, at the worst goddamned time.
I already had to sit through Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Bush I, Bush II, and I do NOT want to unnecessarily have to watch this country go off the rails with this NUT job.
Hillary will do. In fact, she will more than do. Ms. Wasserman-Schultz can go take a hike. She's gone. The selection of VP has been made. WHY make a scene now?
Once everything is said & done, we can bitch then. "Yeah", you think, "What good will it do?" Well, what fucking good is it going to do now other than cost us votes against these crazy fuckers? And yes, they are C-R-A-Z-Y. They are ALL crazy. Something is really, seriously wrong with them. And we do NOT want them in charge.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)A big thank you to FLOTUS for showing us the way forward, and in such a clear, concise way.
In her speech, she turned the tide and made the Sanders or Bust crowd exactly what they didn't want to be - irrelevant.
This isn't to diminish Sanders' pull on the party. He made a mark that will play out over time. The protestors, to paraphrase Shakespeare, are only full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.