Blunt, Kander locked in close Senate race
Source: STL Post Dispatch
The poll shows Blunt leading among middle-age and older voters and among those living in rural areas of the state. Kander leads among those in the 18-34 age range, and he draws the most support in the St. Louis and Kansas City metropolitan areas.
The now-familiar gender gap is evident, with Blunt holding a double-digit advantage among men and Kander winning by a similar margin among women.
The poll also shows a racial divide: Blacks overwhelmingly favor Kander, while Blunt shows a lead among whites of more than 20 points. Each candidate wins roughly nine of 10 voters in their respective parties, while Blunt has a narrow lead among self-identified independents.
The poll contains two warning signs for Blunt, pollster Brad Coker said. Incumbents who poll under 50 percent are generally viewed to be vulnerable. And while Blunt is far more known than Kander, Blunts roughly 1-1 ratio of voters who are favorable vs. those who are unfavorable toward him pales next to Kanders 2-1 favorable-to-unfavorable ratio.
Read more: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/blunt-kander-locked-in-close-senate-race/article_6a3d3ad3-612d-510e-9ca4-fc41059fddaf.html
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)We lived in Missouri for 2 years, I would never have guessed anyone could beat Blunt.
DarthDem
(5,255 posts). . . for anyone who doesn't have a chance to visit the link.
Great result! Blunt is exactly the sort of dull Republican hatchetman who could get swept out in a wave. And I really like Kander's energy and enthusiasm.
Gamecock Lefty
(700 posts)dicksmc3
(262 posts)Supported the Iraq war, tax breaks for the very wealthy (includes himself) and opposed everything Obama wanted. He's a conservative BIG MONEY man with little or no new ideas..Vote for Kander, a PROGRESSIVE for Missouri...
David__77
(23,364 posts)The Senate results might be great for Democrats.