Trump pays IRS a penalty for his foundation violating rules with gift to aid Florida attorney genera
Source: Washington Post
Donald Trump paid the IRS a $2,500 penalty this year, an official at Trump's company said, after it was revealed that Trump's charitable foundation had violated tax laws by giving a political contribution to a campaign group connected to Florida's attorney general.
The improper donation, a $25,000 gift from the Donald J. Trump Foundation, was made in 2013. At the time, Attorney General Pam Bondi was considering whether to investigate fraud allegations against Trump University. She decided not to pursue the case.
Earlier this year, The Washington Post and a liberal watchdog group raised new questions about the three-year-old gift. The watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, filed a complaint with the IRS noting that, as a registered nonprofit, the Trump Foundation was not allowed to make political donations.
In that year's tax filings, The Post reported, the Trump Foundation did not notify the IRS of this political donation. Instead, Trump's foundation listed a donation also for $25,000 to a Kansas charity with a name similar to that of Bondi's political group. In fact, Trump's foundation had not given the Kansas group any money.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/09/01/trump-pays-irs-a-penalty-for-his-foundation-violating-rules-with-gift-to-florida-attorney-general/
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)Maeve
(42,279 posts)But then, it's ok if you're a Republican't
patsimp
(915 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)than the rest of us do. Bernie Madoff only went to jail because he ripped off other rich people, instead of just raiding pension funds, etc.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)There is no way he wouldn't be in jail for fraud.
vkkv
(3,384 posts)LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP!
BumRushDaShow
(128,748 posts)BRIBE.
riversedge
(70,182 posts)there is some vetting, but not enough.
BumRushDaShow
(128,748 posts)It is in the nature of jesters to speak their minds when the mood takes them, regardless of the consequences. They are neither calculating nor circumspect, and this may account for the "foolishness" often ascribed to them. Jesters are also generally of inferior social and political status and are rarely in a position (and rarely inclined) to pose a power threat. They have little to gain by caution and little to lose by candorapart from liberty, livelihood, and occasionally even life, which hardly seems to have been a deterrent. They are peripheral to the game of politics, and this can reassure a king that their words are unlikely to be geared to their own advancement. Jesters are not noted for flattery or fawning. The ruler can be isolated from his courtiers and ministers, who might conspire against him. The jester too can be an isolated and peripheral figure somehow detached from the intrigues of the court, and this enables him to act as a kind of confidant.
<...>
The jester is also perceived as being on the side of the people, the little man fighting oppression by the powerful. By fooling wisely ("en folastrant sagement" , the jester often won favor among the people ("gaigna de grace parmy le peuple" . In the folk perception of southern India a king was hardly considered a king without his jester, and the continuing appeal of the court jester in India, in stories and comic books, is perhaps equaled only in Europe. He may have disappeared from the courts and corridors of power, but he still has a powerful hold on the collective imagination. Yet he is no rebel or revolutionary. His detached stance allows him to take the side of the victim in order to curb the excesses of the system without ever trying to overthrow ithis purpose is not to replace one system with another, but to free us from the fetters of all systems:
Under the dissolvent influence of his personality the iron network of physical, social and moral law, which enmeshes us from the cradle to the grave, seemsfor the momentnegligible as a web of gossamer. The Fool does not lead a revolt against the Law, he lures us into a region of the spirit where, as Lamb would put it, the writ does not run.
<...>
http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/640914.html
so he has never been taken seriously, and is why he has gotten this far evading punishment. IMHO, as I have posted before, he doesn't really want or need the Presidency. He can fly where he wants and stay where he wants, when he wants, and have hoards of fawning people following him around while he bilks them of every dime they have. It is those who are power-hungry around him who have hitched a ride to him in search of the great riches they believe are inherent in a Presidency.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)It's good to see the IRS was able to extract something from the Trumpster.
George II
(67,782 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)paid a bribe to a judge.
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,110 posts)turbinetree
(24,688 posts)lets not forget that this is what Les Moonves said about this hypocrite
https://theintercept.com/2016/02/29/cbs-donald-trump/
https://theintercept.com/2016/03/16/trump-campaign-ads/
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,378 posts)SleeplessinSoCal
(9,110 posts)And a little PBS Newshour along the way.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)Not even a slap on the wrist.
Unless this is made an issue every time he mouths off about "election fraud" and "rigged election".
jpak
(41,757 posts)Lock him up.
NBachers
(17,098 posts)turbinetree
(24,688 posts)and everyone in the media is screaming about the Clinton foundation, do I have this right. And then he filed a false IRS form and he only had to pay a 10% penalty, really.
Bartlette and Steele, David Cay Johnston got it completely right in there books, about the "haves" and the 'have nots", and Johnston about Trump
They_Live
(3,231 posts)and probably some other states as well.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)not just pay a 10% tax 'penalty'.