CNN/ORC polls: Trump's national gains extend to Florida, Ohio
Source: CNN
Washington (CNN)With eight weeks to go before Election Day, Donald Trump holds a narrow lead over Hillary Clinton in Ohio and the two are locked in a near-even contest in Florida, according to new CNN/ORC polls in the two critical battleground states.
Among likely voters in Ohio, Trump stands at 46% to Clinton's 41%, with 8% behind Libertarian Gary Johnson and 2% behind Green Party nominee Jill Stein. In Florida, likely voters split 47% for Trump to 44% for Clinton, within the poll's 3.5 percentage point margin of error, and with 6% behind Johnson and 1% backing Stein.
In both states, Trump's support increases as a result of the likely voter screen, among all registered voters, Clinton edges Trump 45% to 44% in Florida, and in Ohio, Trump tops Clinton 43% to 39% with Johnson at 12%.
The polls come as other national and battleground state polls suggest a sharply tightened contest compared with mid-August. While Clinton emerged from her convention with the advantage in surveys in both states and nationwide, more recent surveys suggest a closer contest and an enthusiasm gap that tilts in Trump's favor. A Bloomberg Politics survey of Ohio voters released Wednesday morning found Trump ahead by five points, identical to the margin in this survey of Ohio voters, and Quinnipiac University surveys released shortly after Labor Day showed an even contest in Florida with Trump up four points in Ohio.
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/14/politics/cnn-orc-poll-florida-ohio-donald-trump-hillary-clinton/index.html?adkey=bn
There is still almost two months to go. Plenty of time for voting Americans to come to the realization that they might be electing a madman!
Farmgirl1961
(1,493 posts)Wake up people!!!!!!
vadermike
(1,415 posts)After all the shit ha has said they still want him I don't think there is anything he can say or do at this point he is Teflon I am in despair
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)NeoConsSuck
(2,544 posts)Wringing one's hands does nothing to turn around an election. Like you wrote: Donate. Make Calls. Canvass. VOTE.
Democat
(11,617 posts)There are so many accounts coming out of the woodwork today to say the exact same thing:
Trump is teflon.
Clinton is going to lose.
Anyone else see a pattern?
adigal
(7,581 posts)He is beating her handily in Ohio. Wtf?????? Florida is tied. We are in trouble. How can 1/2 this country go for a carnival barker?? I am ready to pull. My hair out of my head.
adigal
(7,581 posts)This is how you lose elections. Refuse to look at reality.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Intelligent replies would be wasted.
Democat
(11,617 posts)And then there are trolls.
DU has a troll problem for the last few days.
adigal
(7,581 posts)Democat
(11,617 posts)But it's not you. Sorry if it wasn't clear.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)blm
(113,039 posts)If you did then you are a 'likely voter' in 2016 and they will include you in their poll.
If you didn't vote in off-year races, you were not included.
This is why I never panic over Likely Voter polls, and the corporate media knows damn well how specific 'likely voter' polls are yet they tout them anyway during presidential election years.
kcjohn1
(751 posts)This particular poll, there is no difference between registered & likely in Ohio. Trump is up 43-39 among registered voters.
FL its 45-44 Clinton.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)this same poll had major flaws last week with the makeup of their sampling........
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)But I agree with you. WHAT kind of polling methodology is cooked into THIS poll?
What are the cross tabs etc.?
machomaas
(8 posts)Besides the bias towards older people I also notice very few respondents from the Cleveland area!
Divine Discontent
(21,056 posts)That matters a lot! It's BS when they do polls that are slanted and try to push them as accurate in their methodology.
machomaas
(8 posts)Besides the likely voter screen which uses some Proprietary(?) formula that isn't fully described, the demos of the people who are described as likely might have something to do with these numbers. For one thing, Almost all of the likely voter respondents are over 50. Also seems strange to me that the Don has the same support among white women as he does among white men. Maybe it's because of the old thing. This is for Florida poll BTW, haven't looked at Ohio poll yet.
bucolic_frolic
(43,121 posts)What am I not understanding?
It's the Evangelicals? The manufactured Benghazi damage?
Faux News?
What will we do if this Devil takes office? America cannot survive this.
We will be a Friendly Dictatorship for the Monied Interests
videohead5
(2,171 posts)Staggering into her vehicle all weekend on all the news channels.Hillary just released more medical information.the media is also finally attacking Trump.
BumRushDaShow
(128,740 posts)so most of the people contacted wouldn't have seen that.
PSPS
(13,587 posts)LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)CNN with their 2nd or 3rd poll in a row in which they change the metrics yet again to KEEP this year's presidential race a "horse race."
The internals tell the story so clearly.
Yeah, I'll work hard in any way I CAN to get Hillary elected from the GREAT state of California, and Stick with Sam Wang then Nate.
TomCADem
(17,387 posts)Insisting that the polls leading up to the election are wrong leads to embarrassment. I think the bigger issue is not the polls, but the actions of the media in skewing coverage against Hillary such as making up a scandal about the Clinton Foundation, but ignoring the actual bribery with the Trump foundation:
machomaas
(8 posts)http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/images/09/14/floridapoll.pdf
Columns with N/A correspond to less than ~140 respondents
TexasBushwhacker
(20,165 posts)Blue cities and red rural areas in both states. Push voter registration and GOTV in the cities makes it a lot easier than having to campaign statewide.
SansACause
(520 posts)I understand the South voting for Trump (same as it ever was), but what's with Ohio? Spillover from Kentucky or something?
SansACause
(520 posts)LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)Pretty soon, ORO/CNN will be polling the most conservative, made-dominated, uneducated counties in California where there are STILL some died-in-the-wool conservatives who long for a RED California, and they'll get the kind of polling numbers they want and then the headlines will read "Trump sharply closing the gap with Clinton in California."
I live here in California and the last few solid polls had tRump trailing Hillary by some 20 points here in California. In other words, these polls are crafting a horse race narrative. Not to say that we should be complacent or that we shouldn't be working to GOTV like we're behind 10 points, but at some point we have to forget about these horse race polls some of these pollsters are crafting and do OUR thing, because these polls are being crafted to KEEP the networks from losing $$$ via viewer ship. IF these polls showed Hillary with continued solid leads over tRump, do you think people would be watching CNN?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Appalling numbers of white nationalists out there.
Really ashamed to be white these days.
Barf.
MisterFred
(525 posts)Going beyond the complexity of how to define race, you shouldn't ever feel ashamed of what other people do, unless you have somehow encouraged that action.
Slaves crossing the Atlantic had no reason to be ashamed because members of their "race" sold them into slavery. Americans with Chinese ancestry are not responsible for the actions of the Taiwanese government. And you are not responsible for white supremacists, unless you fail to oppose them when you meet them or otherwise give support.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)but its' very real and there's no dissociating myself from it.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Former New Yorker. I would vote for Mickey Mouse before I ever voted for Donald Trump. Are Americans really this gullible? Yes, I will vote for Hillary solely because she ISN'T Donald Trump. Sorry, if this upset Hillary fans, but a vote is a vote no matter the reason.
Skittles
(153,138 posts)seriously
ffr
(22,668 posts)Greywing
(1,124 posts)Now that's what I call a misleading poll. Morale is don't be so quick to believe a poll.
muntrv
(14,505 posts)Old Vet
(2,001 posts)First I cant believe the people I know backing trump, Wow. Second, Every Bernie supporter that's backing Gary Johnson because they feel ripped off will do more harm then then people are discussing. Third, What happened to Mr Sanders support to not let Trump get elected? Just saying....................
ffr
(22,668 posts)Whoopsie.
Relax. Keep up the good work, if you're part of the HRC GOTV
Old Vet
(2,001 posts)Greywing
(1,124 posts)Florida poll. I don't feel very panicked in looking at this poll at all after looking at the polling data
MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)Not enough sample size for less that 50 years in LV
They appear magically in RV, so they are saying young people are less enthusiastic to vote.
Florida poll has not enough sample size in Tampa Bay Area for LV.. So people in Tampa bay donot care to vote.
MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)In a poll dataset of 700 even 35 voters can create a 5percent noise
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Look, I know there are a lot of "deplorables" here, but we also have a lot of hispanics and women who gave this state to Obama twice. I honestly feel the reasons these polls are chanted is because if there is some trickery, it will be accpeted. This is the state where Pam Bondi got CAUGHT being a crook!
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)Hillary is no Obama. If she can get that magic sauce going it is a lock but I have my doubts, look at her events nothing like the enthusiasm I remember going to Obama rallies, and the Bernie rallies I attended, that's the problem she's just a good campaigner, a high bar following some of the greatest campaigners including her husband.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)racism and misogyny now feel free to let their true colors show.
Racism IS as American as cherry pie.
TomCADem
(17,387 posts)Well, the fact that the media's hobby is to tear down Hillary and build up Trump has something to do with it.
http://www.vox.com/2016/6/20/11949860/media-coverage-hillary-clinton
Fox News ran 330 stories about Hillary Clinton in 2015. About 300 of them were overtly negative, according to new research.
Fox News may have hit Clinton harder than any other news outlet, but its hardly been alone in treating her candidacy with extra scrutiny. Harvards Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy released a report this week that says the top news outlets hammered Clinton in 2015 far more than any other presidential candidate.
According to the report, eight of Americas most influential news outlets wrote coverage "negative in tone" about Clinton 84 percent of the time compared to just 43 percent for Donald Trump, and 17 percent for Bernie Sanders.
Divine Discontent
(21,056 posts)brush
(53,763 posts)Last edited Thu Sep 15, 2016, 06:58 PM - Edit history (1)
DownriverDem
(6,227 posts)CNN reported that they under polled those under 50. WTF?????????
BigDemVoter
(4,149 posts)to push back hard.