Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zing Zing Zingbah

(6,496 posts)
Sun Sep 25, 2016, 06:48 PM Sep 2016

For the first time, it looks like Maine’s electoral votes will be split

Source: Portland Press Herald

"Trump is leading by double digits in rural regions, while Clinton has the same lock on the more urban south."



Read more: http://www.pressherald.com/2016/09/25/maine-voters-appear-poised-to-render-historic-electoral-college-vote-split-in-2016-election/



I'm disgusted with this. I live in the second district, but just barely. My city is more southern Maine, but grouped in with the 2nd district. I can't believe people are this stupid.
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
For the first time, it looks like Maine’s electoral votes will be split (Original Post) Zing Zing Zingbah Sep 2016 OP
Time to make sure he hasn't sold out to anyone for money... onecent Sep 2016 #1
What else do you expect? aeroman Sep 2016 #2
It's disappointing for me Zing Zing Zingbah Sep 2016 #4
That is why Stephen King is upset about the whole situation in Maine. It would still_one Sep 2016 #5
It's even worse that it would be the first time splitting the electoral vote Zing Zing Zingbah Sep 2016 #7
That is why call banking to mobilze Democrats to get out the vote is so important still_one Sep 2016 #11
Especially since there is a reasonable 269-269 scenario out there aeroman Sep 2016 #12
There is a Clinton 270 - Trump 268 exboyfil Sep 2016 #27
and increasingly old and uneducated. jpak Sep 2016 #24
I was up north in Orono this weekend and there were tons of Hillary signs there Zing Zing Zingbah Sep 2016 #3
Unfortunately, I see mostly Trump signs when I drive mainer Sep 2016 #19
Me too. jpak Sep 2016 #25
Well, you do have Governor Dufus too! WhiteTara Sep 2016 #6
Nobody in Maine needs reminding about LePage Zing Zing Zingbah Sep 2016 #8
How's the GOTV going for Dems in Maine? Farmgirl1961 Sep 2016 #9
Nate Silver still has the probability of Maine going to Hillary still_one Sep 2016 #10
This will set a dangerous precedent if a blue state splits its EVs. LonePirate Sep 2016 #13
Agree - it should be every state or no state doing this. Unfortunately, it's up to each state to 24601 Sep 2016 #21
Seems simple enough to me... Heeeeers Johnny Sep 2016 #14
I'm still skeptical of polling from congressional districts. They're generally less reliable... Drunken Irishman Sep 2016 #15
"They're generally less reliable..." BumRushDaShow Sep 2016 #17
Maine only has two congressional districts Zing Zing Zingbah Sep 2016 #20
I didn't say it didn't make sense - I said it's still less reliable. Drunken Irishman Sep 2016 #26
Maine elected Paul LePage as their governor DFW Sep 2016 #16
driving to Unity, Maine, I was so depressed mainer Sep 2016 #18
Sad, indeed. TryLogic Sep 2016 #22
i live in the 2nd District and there are Trump signs everywhere - and virtually no Hillary signs jpak Sep 2016 #23

Zing Zing Zingbah

(6,496 posts)
4. It's disappointing for me
Sun Sep 25, 2016, 06:58 PM
Sep 2016

because I grew up in the area and people seem to have become increasing stupid and bat shit over the years. It was different when I was a kid. Poor people voting to keep themselves poor it seems.

still_one

(92,060 posts)
5. That is why Stephen King is upset about the whole situation in Maine. It would
Sun Sep 25, 2016, 07:01 PM
Sep 2016

be a great idea for one of his books, but as I believe he has said, too terrifying to even contemplate


Zing Zing Zingbah

(6,496 posts)
7. It's even worse that it would be the first time splitting the electoral vote
Sun Sep 25, 2016, 07:06 PM
Sep 2016

and it has to be for that asshole.

still_one

(92,060 posts)
11. That is why call banking to mobilze Democrats to get out the vote is so important
Sun Sep 25, 2016, 07:23 PM
Sep 2016

It also will help those who are very nervous about what is going on because they are actually doing something positive It is positive for the caller, and for the campaign

aeroman

(64 posts)
12. Especially since there is a reasonable 269-269 scenario out there
Sun Sep 25, 2016, 07:24 PM
Sep 2016

Would be hard to take if Trump got to 270 with that one EC. :~

exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
27. There is a Clinton 270 - Trump 268
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 04:22 PM
Sep 2016

that I found on the 270 to win website. That assumed the Maine vote was not split.

269/269 and all hell will break loose. Four years of Pence as VP (assuming the Dems take the Senate).

Zing Zing Zingbah

(6,496 posts)
3. I was up north in Orono this weekend and there were tons of Hillary signs there
Sun Sep 25, 2016, 06:55 PM
Sep 2016

but that's a big college town and probably outside of the norm for northern and eastern Maine.

mainer

(12,017 posts)
19. Unfortunately, I see mostly Trump signs when I drive
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 07:18 AM
Sep 2016

and I live on the mid-coast. I think Hillary supporters are just afraid to display their signs.

We're one of the few who displays a Hillary bumper sticker.

jpak

(41,756 posts)
25. Me too.
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 03:37 PM
Sep 2016

Even in former mill towns where there were tons of signs for Dem candidates in previous elections.

Very different than in Caucus season...

WhiteTara

(29,692 posts)
6. Well, you do have Governor Dufus too!
Sun Sep 25, 2016, 07:06 PM
Sep 2016

(Sorry I can't remember his name...) but you all are the lucky ones with him!

I live in blood red Arkansas, so I can sympathize. We have Taliban Tom Cotton as our senator! Sigh.

still_one

(92,060 posts)
10. Nate Silver still has the probability of Maine going to Hillary
Sun Sep 25, 2016, 07:21 PM
Sep 2016
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromo

Nevada, Florida, Ohio, and North Carolina are also very much in play

A few day after the first debate between Romney and President Obama, Gallop had Romney up by +6 points, and just before the election it was even with President Obama up by +1.

The polls seem to be experiencing a lot of fluctuation. I know some pollsters have changed their models, and are basing likely voters on previous Presidential election years. I am not sure if those are applicable models this election. They are also changing the way they do polling, less land lines, more cells, and more online surveys, and while that makes sense, I am not sure with caller ID's just how many people pick up the phone with an unrecognized number since there is now so much more spamming that goes on.

Of course there are people who will pick up the phone regardless if they recognize the caller ID or not. My question is, how many are in the other category that won't pick up the phone for an unrecognized number? If there is enough of a percentage in the group that won't answer the phone for an unrecognized number, that could affect the poll.

I suspect that an older demographic would be more inclined to pick up an unrecognized number than a younger demographic, but I don't know.



LonePirate

(13,407 posts)
13. This will set a dangerous precedent if a blue state splits its EVs.
Sun Sep 25, 2016, 07:36 PM
Sep 2016

It's not at all like Obama taking the Omaha EV in deep red NE. Repubs will renew their push to expand the Maine system to other blue states they control like Michigan. Of course, they will never do this in states like FL or TX. They will do anything for an electoral advantage.

24601

(3,955 posts)
21. Agree - it should be every state or no state doing this. Unfortunately, it's up to each state to
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 09:06 AM
Sep 2016

determine how to allocate the EV.

Heeeeers Johnny

(423 posts)
14. Seems simple enough to me...
Sun Sep 25, 2016, 07:44 PM
Sep 2016
Neither candidate is well liked.

This election isn't going to be decided on politics or the issues... it's going to be decided on perception, and whom is least
despised.


With only seven weeks remaining before the election, only 59 percent of voters said they definitely know who they’ll vote for, up only eight points from the newspaper’s poll in June, when 51 percent of voters said they had made up their minds.

Andrew Smith, director of the University of New Hampshire Survey Center, which conducted the poll, said voter indecision is high for mid-September, when about 70 percent of voters normally say they’ve made up their minds. Smith said the low commitment level reflects the unpopularity of both of the top candidates.
 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
15. I'm still skeptical of polling from congressional districts. They're generally less reliable...
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 02:52 AM
Sep 2016

...than statewide polling simply because you're dealing with a smaller sample size and therefore, have a potential for a larger MOE.

BumRushDaShow

(128,417 posts)
17. "They're generally less reliable..."
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 06:17 AM
Sep 2016

and not just due to smaller sample size... It can be deceptive due to gerrymandering! Like here in PA -the 7th Congressional District that had recently gone purple, when Democrat Adm. Joe Sestak won the seat in 2006 and landslided the seat by 20 points in 2008. That didn't go over well with the state GOP and the district was subsequently spider-webbed after the 2010 election and census when the GOP took over the PA State Senate & governor's office, going from this -



to this -



which resulted in creating a red seat once more after PA lost 2 congressional seats, by running the district through 5 counties and excluding most of the smaller urban areas within those 5 counties. I.e., they excluded Reading, Norristown, Pottstown, Coatesville, and split Chester City (which is 75% black).

So when the analysts see the gerrymandering that helped put the GOP in congress, but ignore that this was the ONLY reason why they got there, then they get confused when the GOP loses in statewide and/or in national elections (governorships, U.S. Senators, Presidents).

Zing Zing Zingbah

(6,496 posts)
20. Maine only has two congressional districts
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 07:21 AM
Sep 2016

and it does make sense in Maine to do presidential election polling by congressional district because Maine is one of the few states that can split electoral votes for president according to congressional district.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
26. I didn't say it didn't make sense - I said it's still less reliable.
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 04:13 PM
Sep 2016

You're still dealing with a very small sample size and a larger MOE than you'd receive in a state-wide poll.

The MOE is greater in those congressional district polls compared to their state poll (4 to 6 - with six being an extremely high MOE for a poll). The statewide numbers are 513 likely voters -and you know less than half of that is this one congressional district (since it's less populated and more rural), which means, at best, it polled roughly 256 people at most. That's an extremely small sample size.

DFW

(54,272 posts)
16. Maine elected Paul LePage as their governor
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 04:43 AM
Sep 2016

SOMEBODY up there must like the way Trump conducts himself. I ran into LePage at the Zumwalt christening at the Bath Ironworks 2 years ago. A more offensive, ignorant oaf I can't imagine, especially since the only other governor of Maine I ever met is Angus King, who is everything LePage is not.

mainer

(12,017 posts)
18. driving to Unity, Maine, I was so depressed
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 07:16 AM
Sep 2016

Went to the Common Ground Fair over the weekend (organic farmers' fair) and I passed Trump yard sign after Trump yard sign, almost always displayed in front of rundown houses. I felt I'd accidentally wandered out of the state I thought I knew. Then I got to the fair, and thank god at least there the cars had Bernie and Hillary bumper stickers. The dearth of Hillary signs in northern/central Maine is really grim.

jpak

(41,756 posts)
23. i live in the 2nd District and there are Trump signs everywhere - and virtually no Hillary signs
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 03:34 PM
Sep 2016

Most of the Trump signs are also accompanied by "No on 3" signs.

No on 3 = reject universal gun background checks.

I wonder how their wives are going to vote...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»For the first time, it lo...