FBI director: Hackers 'poking around' voter systems
Source: CNN
The FBI director is telling states to make sure they are on top of their voter registration systems, saying would-be hackers are "poking around."
While James Comey testified Wednesday to Congress that there haven't been any additional successful hacks, there have been scans and attempts that indicate "bad actors" are trying to see where they can get in.
"There have been a variety of scanning activities, which is a preamble for potential intrusion activities as well as some attempted intrusions at voter database registrations beyond those we knew about in July and August," Comey told a House committee during an FBI oversight hearing.
Comey was being asked about a warning the FBI sent to states in June, and two successful intrusions into voter registration databases in Illinois and Arizona.
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/28/politics/fbi-james-comey-election-cyberattacks/index.html
Keep an eye on Putin.
Foggyhill
(1,060 posts)Clinton should pound him on this relentlessly, she's being too nice on this.
This is abominable that this Russian sockpuppet is allowed to thrive.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)with no paper trail.
Such a great idea.
Should have gone with optical scan with ballots audited against vote totals.
Igel
(35,300 posts)Voter registration systems.
Crash2Parties
(6,017 posts)It's really not difficult to require, build, test, buy and implement voting systems that are secure and can pass a audit. We do it every day in other situations. Instead we've decided the free market is the best way to run our elections...or worse, in a not insignificant number of states mandated known insecure systems.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)"James Comey testified Wednesday to Congress that there haven't been any additional successful hacks"
But the truly successful ones would not get detected, right? The problem is that if there is doubt...
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)I could be wrong...
hedda_foil
(16,372 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,451 posts)Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)because they want to disrupt the election. The information contained in those databases may be very useful to certain cyber-criminals.
groundloop
(11,518 posts)I'm betting a large number of people, if faced with the prospect of needing to jump through the hoops of trying to prove that they're registered, would simply say to hell with it and not cast a ballot.