Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,516 posts)
Thu Sep 29, 2016, 11:31 PM Sep 2016

Officer's lawyer: Jury should hear about auditory exclusion

Source: Associated Press

Officer's lawyer: Jury should hear about auditory exclusion

Sean Murphy, Associated Press

Updated 9:12 pm, Thursday, September 29, 2016

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — A lawyer for a white Oklahoma police officer charged in an unarmed black man's death says she was so hyper-focused on the situation that she didn't hear other officers arrive on the scene or even the deadly gunshot she fired.

Tulsa officer Betty Shelby, who is expected to plead not guilty to first-degree manslaughter at her arraignment on Friday, experienced what is commonly called "auditory exclusion," a condition in which people in high-stress situations often don't hear sounds around them, said her attorney, Scott Wood.

"She didn't hear the gunshot, didn't hear the sirens coming up behind her just prior to the shot," Wood said Thursday. "And it's not only a common phenomenon described in literature, but it's the No. 1 perceptual distortion by people I have represented who have been involved in shootings — diminished sound or complete auditory exclusion."

He said that while Shelby's defense won't hinge on whether she was aware of other officers when she shot 40-year-old Terence Crutcher on Sept. 16, it would be important for jurors to know.

Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/crime/article/Officer-s-lawyer-Jury-should-hear-about-auditory-9455897.php

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Officer's lawyer: Jury should hear about auditory exclusion (Original Post) Judi Lynn Sep 2016 OP
Then she shouldn't be a police officer. LiberalFighter Sep 2016 #1
I hope that she's successful in her claim Orrex Sep 2016 #2
Oh, depending on the jurisdiction, it might apply to some civilians… regnaD kciN Sep 2016 #5
Next they'll say her hangnail made her do it. Feeling the Bern Sep 2016 #3
It's just another term for "she panicked". brush Sep 2016 #4
She OUGHT to go to jail, and for more than manslaughter… regnaD kciN Sep 2016 #6
The whole country saw the video. They can't hid this one. JAIL in her future. brush Sep 2016 #7
What a BS excuse GummyBearz Sep 2016 #8
I don't have Coolest Ranger Sep 2016 #9
Not defending her melm00se Sep 2016 #10
Hence, either she was not trained, or she is making an excuse. LanternWaste Sep 2016 #16
So what? truthisfreedom Sep 2016 #11
BULLSHIT! Odin2005 Sep 2016 #12
'Cause her diminished hearing made him appear to have a weapon. n/t egeorgequi Sep 2016 #13
Would anyone in law enforcement accept this christx30 Sep 2016 #14
Maybe she had something else - Attentional Control atreides1 Sep 2016 #15
She still didn't grab her taser first TexasBushwhacker Sep 2016 #17
... Crepuscular Sep 2016 #18
Did she request backup, via radio? Zo Zig Sep 2016 #19

Orrex

(63,201 posts)
2. I hope that she's successful in her claim
Thu Sep 29, 2016, 11:51 PM
Sep 2016

Because then every single person who suffers a confrontation with cops can thereafter claim that they were "so hyper-focused on the situation" that they didn't hear the cops yelling orders at them.

Or does this "auditory exclusion" phenomenon only manifest in cops?

regnaD kciN

(26,044 posts)
5. Oh, depending on the jurisdiction, it might apply to some civilians…
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 12:09 AM
Sep 2016

…if they're WHITE, that is.

regnaD kciN

(26,044 posts)
6. She OUGHT to go to jail, and for more than manslaughter…
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 12:11 AM
Sep 2016

…but I'm betting the Oklahoma jury will come to see things her way. After all, Blue Lives Matter!


 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
8. What a BS excuse
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 12:35 AM
Sep 2016

If you can't handle the job then find one you can handle. This sounds like my BS excuse when I say I didn't hear my wife ask me to vacuum

Coolest Ranger

(2,034 posts)
9. I don't have
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 07:20 AM
Sep 2016

faith in this city to do the right thing. I just don't. This cop is going to walk just like so many others

melm00se

(4,990 posts)
10. Not defending her
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 07:49 AM
Sep 2016

but I know that in highly stressful situations people can manifest "tunnel vision". If you summon the google, you will find quite a few articles on stress related tunnel vision like this one.

She and her counsel can present any (supportable) defense at trial (in fact it is their right to do so). Whether or not the jury accepts or rejects that defense is one question and the bigger one (as mentioned above) is what are the implications/repercussions of this being a successful defense.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
16. Hence, either she was not trained, or she is making an excuse.
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 04:19 PM
Sep 2016

The purpose of effective training is to overcome instances of stressful biases. Hence, either she was not trained (unlikely, as all police cadets undergo training), or she is simply making an excuse.

truthisfreedom

(23,145 posts)
11. So what?
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 07:57 AM
Sep 2016

Lock her up! Let her serve her deserved time. She's useless as a cop and she's a murderer. Why did she apply for the job if she can't keep her shit together? Why didn't they stress-test her?

She should go to prison as an example to those who would apply to be cops but don't have the fortitude to do the job.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
14. Would anyone in law enforcement accept this
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 11:41 AM
Sep 2016

as an excuse from someone that's not a cop? Me? I'm not trained to deal with stressful situations. I know it would happen to me, and if someone died as a result, I'd be in prison (and rightly so) for killing an innocent person.

Now, she's supposed to be a trained law enforcement officer. She's been trained. She's supposed to be better than that. Lock her up.

atreides1

(16,072 posts)
15. Maybe she had something else - Attentional Control
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 03:48 PM
Sep 2016

Attentional control refers to an individual's capacity to choose what they pay attention to and what they ignore.

Perhaps she chose to ignore the other officers while choosing to fire on the victim, and failed to realize that her backup had already tazed Mr. Crutcher!

It's also known as selective attention!

It's something that the prosecutor can rebut the defense with.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,173 posts)
17. She still didn't grab her taser first
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 04:39 PM
Sep 2016

Perhaps if she hadn't grabbed her gun first she wouldn't have had this panic induced deafness.

I predict they will plead this one down to second degree manslaughter. That was the charge against the "reserve deputy" in Tulsa who "accidently grabbed his gun instead of his taser and killed a man. He's 73 and they still gave him the maximum; 4 years.

Crepuscular

(1,057 posts)
18. ...
Fri Sep 30, 2016, 04:55 PM
Sep 2016

If she is smart she will ask for a bench trial instead of a jury. Won't be at all surprised if she is acquitted of the manslaughter charge.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Officer's lawyer: Jury sh...