Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cal04

(41,505 posts)
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 06:19 AM Jul 2012

President Obama tells lawmakers ‘we’ve got to do more’ to boost job growth

Source: The Hill

President Obama touted the signing of a $105 billion transportation bill and called on GOP lawmakers to take up additional measures he said would help speed up job creation, in his weekly address.

Speaking from Ohio, where Obama was wrapping up a two-day bus tour, the president pushed back against a weak June jobs report, telling Congress ”we've got to do more."

“Our mission isn’t just to put people back to work – it’s to rebuild an economy where that work pays; an economy in which everyone who works hard has the chance to get ahead,” said the president.

(snip)
“For months, I’ve been pushing Congress to pass several common-sense ideas that will help us do that. And on Friday, I signed into law a bill that will do two things for the American people,” he said.

Read more: http://thehill.com/video/administration/236535-obama-tells-lawmakers-weve-got-to-do-more-to-boost-job-growth



WEEKLY ADDRESS: Pushing Congress to Create Jobs, Keep College in Reach for Middle Class

In this week’s address, President Obama spoke to the American people from Ohio about a bill signed on Friday that does two important things: it keeps thousands of construction workers on the job rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure, and it stops interest rates on federal loans from doubling this year for more than seven million students. The President urges Congress to do more to help our economic recovery and create jobs, including taking half the money we’re no longer spending on war and using it to build roads, bridges and wireless networks at home, and expanding financial aid to two million students while giving them the opportunity to learn the skills that businesses need right now. It’s time for our elected officials to come together to help strengthen the middle class.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/07/06/weekly-address-pushing-congress-create-jobs-keep-college-reach-middle-cl
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
President Obama tells lawmakers ‘we’ve got to do more’ to boost job growth (Original Post) cal04 Jul 2012 OP
Clearly, the President "doesn't get it". Denninmi Jul 2012 #1
Who is "they"? Mayflower1 Jul 2012 #2
Rethuglican congress and bItch McConnell. geckosfeet Jul 2012 #3
Well, well said geckosfeet. Bringing the troops home would good for everyone. xtraxritical Jul 2012 #15
Right, That Was All Spelled Out DallasNE Jul 2012 #10
The RepubliCONs had their own anti-inaugeration dinner party get together xtraxritical Jul 2012 #17
Pfft. The GOP ain't interested in lifting a finger on Obama's watch. Beartracks Jul 2012 #4
The Republican job killing agenda uwep Jul 2012 #8
Why yesterday the President signed the "Transportation" bill xtraxritical Jul 2012 #18
He needs to fucking march into the Capitol and read them the riot act on live TV, prime time. onehandle Jul 2012 #5
or quote McConnell's "one-term president" remark in a speech or campaign ad! alp227 Jul 2012 #13
Nothing but the facts ma'am. xtraxritical Jul 2012 #19
Absolutely. Call out each one of them by name who voted in favor of the job-transferring AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #28
Total obstructionists Kyad06 Jul 2012 #6
interesting article on small business tax may3rd Jul 2012 #7
So what do they really want? xtraxritical Jul 2012 #20
They can't compete with the new GLT combo businesses .... L0oniX Jul 2012 #25
Get in the presidential time machine and take all that money we gave to bankers 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #9
If you take interest into account, TARP was paid back. Igel Jul 2012 #12
Amazing he can get anything done. Progressive dog Jul 2012 #11
Because of inaction by congress Herlong Jul 2012 #14
Because American Labor is not competitive with Chinese Prison and Child Labor... lib2DaBone Jul 2012 #16
Bastards xtraxritical Jul 2012 #21
David Brooks never changes his underware. L0oniX Jul 2012 #24
Of Course, The Media Will Largely Ignore... TomCADem Jul 2012 #22
Lawmakers produce jobs? Whodathunkit. I thought they only helped other countries get jobs. L0oniX Jul 2012 #23
Here's the wage-lowering, let's-send-more-jobs-to-foreign-countries free-trade agreements that have AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #27
Nice list. L0oniX Jul 2012 #29
Maybe it would help to not sign any more job-transferring "free-trade" agreements. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #26
as long as jobs are being pimped off to the lowest overseas bidders Skittles Jul 2012 #30

Denninmi

(6,581 posts)
1. Clearly, the President "doesn't get it".
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 06:40 AM
Jul 2012


Jobs for the unemployed are secondary. Fixing our crumbling infrastructure is secondary. Everything is secondary to the goal of making Obama a one-term POTUS.

That has been their ONLY goal from day one of his administration. They want power for the sake of power.

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
3. Rethuglican congress and bItch McConnell.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 07:18 AM
Jul 2012

Not like it's news.

They have continued the bUsh policy of raping the country and giving it to the rich. Despite their efforts the country has had positive job growth and a slowly improving economy since president Obama took office. Imagine what would happen if everyone that worked in congress had the same goal - helping the country.

:not-sarcasm:

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
10. Right, That Was All Spelled Out
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 01:06 PM
Jul 2012

In a meeting Frank Luntz conducted with Republican leaders on January 20, 2009. It could best be summarized as "Republicans determined to strike inside the US" as it called for obstructing every piece of legislation Obama proposed. We saw it in practice less than one month after the President came into office on the stimulus bill. Obama's first proposal was hit by a Republican filibuster in the Senate, forcing Obama to restructure it with generous tax cut that finally won over Spector, Snowe and Collins. The traditional honeymoon ended on January 20, 2009.

 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
17. The RepubliCONs had their own anti-inaugeration dinner party get together
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 07:02 PM
Jul 2012

in down town D,C. This is where McConnell stood up and said that the party's (R) number one priority should be making President Obama a one term president. There noncooperation started immediately. Even so, President Obama's accomplishments. Stick with Democrats.



Beartracks

(12,797 posts)
4. Pfft. The GOP ain't interested in lifting a finger on Obama's watch.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 07:54 AM
Jul 2012

The headline might as well read "President Pisses Into Wind Again."

(Sub-headline: "GOP Fears Trickledown During Obama's Term&quot



=====================

uwep

(108 posts)
8. The Republican job killing agenda
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 08:42 AM
Jul 2012

Why is there no mention of the Republicans killing all of the President's job bills? This Republican minority in the senate and the majority in the house has derailed all of the bills that the President presented. Do you remember the party of "NO" and how they ran the car in the ditch. Tell me that, that did not have something to do with the unemployment rate being so HIGH. The CBO said that if the latest job bill presented by the President had passed that there would have been up to 4 million jobs. I do not believe this cannot be repeated enough. Every post should remind the American public who killed their jobs, from outsourcing to killing bills that would have created more jobs. There is only one word "REPUBLICANS!!!!!!"

 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
18. Why yesterday the President signed the "Transportation" bill
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 07:06 PM
Jul 2012

but I think you're right, the house tabled the American Jobs Act which is the centerpiece of the Presidents jobs initiatives.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
5. He needs to fucking march into the Capitol and read them the riot act on live TV, prime time.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 07:58 AM
Jul 2012

Call them out each by name to their face and tell the American people exactly what they have been doing to destroy America.

 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
19. Nothing but the facts ma'am.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 07:11 PM
Jul 2012

He needs to power point the ratio of federal taxes collected per state to federal dollars collected by individual states. Then he could correlate red blue.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
28. Absolutely. Call out each one of them by name who voted in favor of the job-transferring
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 03:28 PM
Jul 2012

"free-trade" agreements.

There are wealthy Senators who approved of the following job-transferring "free-trade" agreements:
1994 - North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
2001 - Jordan – United States Free Trade Agreement
2004 - Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement
2004 - Chile - United States Free Trade Agreement
2004 - Singapore – United States Free Trade Agreement
2006 - Bahrain – United States Free Trade Agreement
2006 - Morocco - United States Free Trade Agreement
2006 - Oman – United States Free Trade Agreement
2007 - Peru – United States Trade Promotion Agreement
2005 - Dominican Republic–Central America Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA; incl. Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and the Dominican Republic)
2011 - Panama - United States Trade Promotion Agreement
2011 - Colombia - United States Trade Promotion Agreement
2011 - Republic of Korea (South Korea) - United States Free Trade Agreement

Of course, if President Obama is in favor of "free-trade" agreements, shouldn't we overlook the job-transferring aspect of this and also be in favor of such "free-trade" agreements?

Shouldn't we be in favor of the pending one as well? Rmoney is.

Trans-Pacific negotiations have been taking place throughout the Obama presidency. The deal is strongly supported by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the top lobbying group for American corporations. Obama's Republican opponent in the 2012 presidential elections, Mitt Romney, has urged the U.S. to finalize the deal as soon as possible.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/13/obama-trade-document-leak_n_1592593.html

Kyad06

(127 posts)
6. Total obstructionists
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 08:18 AM
Jul 2012

I'm really surprised the Highway bill and student Loan bill got passed. What were the trade offs ?

 

may3rd

(593 posts)
7. interesting article on small business tax
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 08:27 AM
Jul 2012
Roll-your-own cigarette stores going up in smoke


On Friday, President Barack Obama is expected to sign into law a federal highway bill with a section that redefines tobacco manufacturers to include any business with a roll-your-own cigarette machine and taxes those products at the same rate as packaged smokes.....


http://www.suntimes.com/photos/galleries/13589276-417/roll-your-own-cigarette-stores-going-up-in-smoke.html


New Law Blamed For Closing Smoke Shop

YANKTON, SD -
A Yankton businessman blames a new law going into effect Sunday for forcing him to close the doors of his roll-your-own cigarette shop.

John Muilenburg's dream of owning his own roll-your-own cigarette shop has gone up in smoke in less than nine months.

&quot I'm) devastated, you know? It's our last day. We don't know what to do. We're done. They just took our livelihood away," Muilenburg said.

He's closing Mullies Cigarette Shop one day before a new state law classifies the business as a cigarette manufacturer, taxing customers more than $15 per box.
.....


http://www.keloland.com/News/NewsDetail6371.cfm?Id=133827


It could easily be argued this is a tax on the poor and a victory for the tobacco lobby

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
25. They can't compete with the new GLT combo businesses ....
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 02:48 PM
Jul 2012

the all in one Guns, Liquor and Topless bar.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
9. Get in the presidential time machine and take all that money we gave to bankers
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 11:20 AM
Jul 2012

and lobbyists and put it towards a CCC type program.

What, we don't have bridges, power plants, dams, roads, and so on that need to be built or maintained?

Igel

(35,274 posts)
12. If you take interest into account, TARP was paid back.
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 04:09 PM
Jul 2012

TARP's still in the hole, though, for two reasons.

Not all banks and financial orgs that were bailed out returned to profitability. They've paid interest but haven't repaid capital. Those are in the minority.

After money came back into TARP it was loaned out for purposes that the law didn't say were okay. A lot of those extra-legal loans are still outstanding.

So, for the most part, you don't need to go in a time machine. All you have to do is take the money--finding authority for using it in other ways--and spend it. Of course, if you do that you increase the deficit for previous years because the repayment wasn't counted as income (it shouldn't have been) but as reimbursement. That's one reason that the 2009 deficit isn't larger than the CBO says.

 

Herlong

(649 posts)
14. Because of inaction by congress
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 05:07 PM
Jul 2012

Last edited Thu Jul 12, 2012, 12:33 AM - Edit history (1)

Most of our current problems are the result of Bush and republican policies.

 

lib2DaBone

(8,124 posts)
16. Because American Labor is not competitive with Chinese Prison and Child Labor...
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 06:52 PM
Jul 2012

David Brooks just on TV saying American workers are not smart enough or dont work hard wnough to compete with China.

Our elected leaders make sure the playing field is always skewed (against American workers ) as the flow of cheap-Chinese-Junk into the U.S continues.

These major corporations will continue to make sure they get HUGE tax breaks while they cut all benefits and punish Senior Citizens.

Republicans call this "Good Business".

TomCADem

(17,382 posts)
22. Of Course, The Media Will Largely Ignore...
Sat Jul 7, 2012, 09:48 PM
Jul 2012

...Any effort to hold Republicans accountable. Taxes remain at historic lows. Government spending has shrunk. Yet, the corporate media still pushes right wing talking points about how we need more of the same.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
27. Here's the wage-lowering, let's-send-more-jobs-to-foreign-countries free-trade agreements that have
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 03:21 PM
Jul 2012

been signed so far:

1994 - North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
2001 - Jordan – United States Free Trade Agreement
2004 - Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement
2004 - Chile - United States Free Trade Agreement
2004 - Singapore – United States Free Trade Agreement
2006 - Bahrain – United States Free Trade Agreement
2006 - Morocco - United States Free Trade Agreement
2006 - Oman – United States Free Trade Agreement
2007 - Peru – United States Trade Promotion Agreement
2005 - Dominican Republic–Central America Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA; incl. Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and the Dominican Republic)
2011 - Panama - United States Trade Promotion Agreement
2011 - Colombia - United States Trade Promotion Agreement
2011 - Republic of Korea (South Korea) - United States Free Trade Agreement

I wonder how many American jobs have been transferred to foreign countries as a result.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
26. Maybe it would help to not sign any more job-transferring "free-trade" agreements.
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 03:18 PM
Jul 2012

Rmoney is in favor of the pending wage-lowering, anti-union, let's-send-even-more-jobs-to-foreign-countries "free-trade" agreement.

If we want more jobs in this country, shouldn't we be opposed to that? Shouldn't Obama be opposed to that?

Yet, here's Rmoney's position as well as the Chamber of Commerce.

Trans-Pacific negotiations have been taking place throughout the Obama presidency. The deal is strongly supported by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the top lobbying group for American corporations. Obama's Republican opponent in the 2012 presidential elections, Mitt Romney, has urged the U.S. to finalize the deal as soon as possible.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/13/obama-trade-document-leak_n_1592593.html


If there is a better way to benefit wealthy stockholders and ruin what is left of the American middle-class, what is it?

Yet how many are going to agree with Rmoney, the Chamber of Commerce, and Republicans who want to benefit wealthy stockholders?
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»President Obama tells law...