Fri Oct 28, 2016, 07:24 AM
HAB911 (8,172 posts)
Judge fears 25,000 voters won't be eligible for Nov. 8 election
Source: Tampa Bay Times
TALLAHASSEE — A federal judge is demanding an explanation from state officials at a hearing today about a backlog in the number of newly registered voters who haven't been verified in time so they can vote in Florida's election. U.S. District Judge Mark Walker has been tracking the number of unverified applicants, which on Thursday was nearly 25,000 out of 125,000 who registered during a weeklong extension the judge granted after Hurricane Matthew this month. "It appears that the amount of voters being processed each day has slowed dramatically," Walker wrote in an order late Thursday. "As of now, almost 25,000 voters may or may not have their vote counted in the 2016 general election." The judge ordered Gov. Rick Scott's top elections official, Secretary of State Ken Detzner, to have his elections division director, Maria Matthews, available to face questions. Read more: http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/elections/by-the-numbers-breaking-down-the-early-voting-and-mail-ballots-across/2300191 The GOP cannot govern
|
26 replies, 3612 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
HAB911 | Oct 2016 | OP |
Jerry442 | Oct 2016 | #1 | |
cynzke | Oct 2016 | #2 | |
BumRushDaShow | Oct 2016 | #4 | |
DK504 | Oct 2016 | #18 | |
BumRushDaShow | Oct 2016 | #24 | |
Igel | Oct 2016 | #25 | |
BumRushDaShow | Oct 2016 | #26 | |
PunksMom | Oct 2016 | #7 | |
jovi | Oct 2016 | #3 | |
Mc Mike | Oct 2016 | #5 | |
Dustlawyer | Oct 2016 | #10 | |
George II | Oct 2016 | #6 | |
Coyotl | Oct 2016 | #8 | |
AllyCat | Oct 2016 | #9 | |
LisaL | Oct 2016 | #11 | |
CentralMass | Oct 2016 | #12 | |
bigbrother05 | Oct 2016 | #13 | |
CentralMass | Oct 2016 | #23 | |
PatSeg | Oct 2016 | #14 | |
cstanleytech | Oct 2016 | #15 | |
HAB911 | Oct 2016 | #16 | |
HAB911 | Oct 2016 | #17 | |
Helen Borg | Oct 2016 | #19 | |
barbtries | Oct 2016 | #20 |
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 07:34 AM
Jerry442 (1,265 posts)
1. "...Slowed dramatically." Who would have thought? NT
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 07:35 AM
cynzke (1,254 posts)
2. These voters will be given provisional ballots.
Response to cynzke (Reply #2)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 07:38 AM
BumRushDaShow (107,880 posts)
4. Exactly what I was going to post.
(by federal law)
|
Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #4)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 09:40 AM
DK504 (3,847 posts)
18. Then the votes won't be counted.
Response to DK504 (Reply #18)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 02:11 PM
BumRushDaShow (107,880 posts)
24. They have to be added to the tally if they are found valid and from valid voters.
SEC. 302. <<NOTE: 42 USC 15482.>> PROVISIONAL VOTING AND VOTING
INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS. (a) Provisional Voting Requirements.--If an individual declares that such individual is a registered voter in the jurisdiction in which the individual desires to vote and that the individual is eligible to vote in an election for Federal office, but the name of the individual does not appear on the official list of eligible voters for the polling place or an election official asserts that the individual is not eligible to vote, such individual shall be permitted to cast a provisional ballot as follows: (1) <<NOTE: Notification.>> An election official at the polling place shall notify the individual that the individual may cast a provisional ballot in that election. (2) The individual shall be permitted to cast a provisional ballot at that polling place upon the execution of a written affirmation by the individual before an election official at the polling place stating that the individual is-- [[Page 116 STAT. 1707]] (A) a registered voter in the jurisdiction in which the individual desires to vote; and (B) eligible to vote in that election. (3) An election official at the polling place shall transmit the ballot cast by the individual or the voter information contained in the written affirmation executed by the individual under paragraph (2) to an appropriate State or local election official for prompt verification under paragraph (4). (4) If the appropriate State or local election official to whom the ballot or voter information is transmitted under paragraph (3) determines that the individual is eligible under State law to vote, the individual's provisional ballot shall be counted as a vote in that election in accordance with State law. (5)(A) At the time that an individual casts a provisional ballot, the appropriate State or local election official shall give the individual written information that states that any individual who casts a provisional ballot will be able to ascertain under the system established under subparagraph (B) whether the vote was counted, and, if the vote was not counted, the reason that the vote was not counted. (B) The appropriate State or local election official shall establish a free access system (such as a toll-free telephone number or an Internet website) that any individual who casts a provisional ballot may access to discover whether the vote of that individual was counted, and, if the vote was not counted, the reason that the vote was not counted. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-107publ252/html/PLAW-107publ252.htm |
Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #24)
Sat Oct 29, 2016, 09:18 AM
Igel (33,319 posts)
25. But urban myth!
A lot of folks think provisional ballots are only processed if ... Well, perhaps never, perhaps only if the race is close, perhaps only if they are for sure from the correct political party, etc.
They're often the ones that think voter rolls should never be purged. So my uncle John, who died in 2008, should still be on the rolls where he lived (in every place that he lived, actually) unless he took steps to remove himself. Like that ever happened. |
Response to Igel (Reply #25)
Sat Oct 29, 2016, 09:30 AM
BumRushDaShow (107,880 posts)
26. Exactly. nt
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 07:37 AM
jovi (61 posts)
3. those left over must have registered as a democrat
it is FL after all. And I live on the treasure coast.
|
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 07:41 AM
Mc Mike (9,059 posts)
5. A Rick Scott / Ken Detzner joint endeavor.
As dRumpf backers, they should be sentenced to the federal pen for this felony election tampering.
|
Response to Mc Mike (Reply #5)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 08:24 AM
Dustlawyer (10,310 posts)
10. And they should track the slow down order to find where the buck stops and throw the
book at them!
|
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 07:49 AM
George II (67,782 posts)
6. Only in states with republican administrations. Unbelievable.
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 08:16 AM
Coyotl (15,262 posts)
8. How very Republican of them.
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 08:21 AM
AllyCat (13,890 posts)
9. They cannot win on their merits. They can only cheat.
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 08:29 AM
LisaL (44,674 posts)
11. Gore lost FL by less than a 1,000.
To put this into perspective.
|
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 08:34 AM
CentralMass (14,527 posts)
12. Yes, but there is no such thing as a rigged election, so no worries
Response to CentralMass (Reply #12)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 08:38 AM
bigbrother05 (5,995 posts)
13. Only rigged if Trump loses?
![]() ![]() |
Response to bigbrother05 (Reply #13)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 12:35 PM
CentralMass (14,527 posts)
23. I think or electoral process has integrity issues.
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 08:49 AM
PatSeg (44,561 posts)
14. Florida, Florida!
Can't run an election without major issues. They've become America's embarrassing eccentric uncle.
|
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 09:17 AM
cstanleytech (24,565 posts)
15. Well yeah we already know they can't govern well but the question we need to ask is
this an accident and thus another example of them being bad at governing or are they doing it deliberately to try and suppress voters? If they are doing it deliberately then its not an issue of being bad at governing it's an issue of them being criminal at it.
|
Response to cstanleytech (Reply #15)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 09:22 AM
HAB911 (8,172 posts)
16. We already know they are crooks from the redistricting case
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/politics/political-pulse/os-judge-ruling-senate-redistricting-case-post.html
but putting any in jail is the problem |
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 09:26 AM
HAB911 (8,172 posts)
17. Not to mention the last Amendment 1 they ignore still
http://floridawaterlandlegacy.org/sections/news/556e045d75c9a1e47e000004
They are all crooks and liars and cheats |
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 09:53 AM
Helen Borg (3,963 posts)
19. Oh no! Florida again!
![]() |
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Fri Oct 28, 2016, 10:11 AM
barbtries (27,087 posts)
20. hell they don't even want to
based on the last 8 years of bullshit.
|