Donald Trump Wasn't Told About Unverified Russia Dossier, Official Says
Source: NBC News
President-elect Donald Trump was not told about unverified reports that Russia has compromising information on him during last week's intelligence briefing, according to a senior intelligence official with knowledge of preparations for the briefing.
A summary of the unverified reports was prepared as background material for the briefing, but not discussed during the meeting, the official said. During Trump's press conference Wednesday morning, the president-elect said he was made aware of the information "outside that meeting."
A 35-page dossier published by BuzzFeed on Tuesday includes claims that the Russian government has been cultivating, supporting and assisting Trump for five years even obtaining compromising information in an effort to blackmail him. The document, which was not prepared by the U.S. government, contains obvious errors. It was originally generated as part of opposition research by anti-Trump Republicans and then shopped by Democrats.
...
According to the senior official, the two-page summary about the unsubstantiated material made available to the briefers was to provide context, should they need it, to draw the distinction for Trump between analyzed intelligence and unvetted "disinformation."
The briefers also had available to them unvetted "disinformation" about the Clinton Foundation, although that was not orally shared with Trump.
Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/trump-cites-nazi-germany-rejects-dossier-alleged-russia-dealings-n705586
atreides1
(16,072 posts)They always seem to appear when the leadership needs plausible deniability!!!
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)How does he know what 's in it?
BainsBane
(53,029 posts)Stick a summary at the end but don't discuss it with him. Plus they must know Trump doesn't read anything.
MFM008
(19,804 posts)Gives him heartburn is a plus.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)During Trump's press conference Wednesday morning, the president-elect said he was made aware of the information "outside that meeting."
He got the message "outside THAT meeting" - so what! - He got the info...
Eyeball_Kid
(7,430 posts)It was to discredit the authenticity of the addendum to the report. The official ALMOST said that the additional document that had "salacious" material was a fictitious sampling of what can go wrong with unverified, unsubstantiated information, and may have almost said it to give a kind of allowance for anyone to believe it.
But, substantively, the official said a big nothing. He neither confirmed nor denied the authenticity of the addendum.