Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 12:48 PM Jan 2017

Spox: Federal Ethics Chief 'Silly' To Criticize Trump's Confict-of-Interest Plan

Source: Talking Points Memo


By MATT SHUHAM Published JANUARY 12, 2017, 11:44 AM EDT

Incoming White House press secretary Sean Spicer on Thursday said it was "silly" for the director of the Office of Government Ethics to criticize Donald Trump’s plan to sever himself from his business.

Spicer was asked about Walter Shaub, Jr.’s criticism on a conference call with reporters. In a speech at the Brookings Institution Wednesday, the OGE director called Trump’s plans to separate himself from his business “wholly inadequate.”

“I don’t know how many times it can be stated,” Spicer began in response. “The president, by law, doesn’t have conflicts. I mean, it’s somewhat of a silly discussion."

"Second, and foremost, I think that Sheri Dillon just did a phenomenal job yesterday of outlining the additional steps—the unnecessary steps, frankly—that he is going to show the American people how focused he wants to be on moving the country forward," he added.

Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/sean-spicer-oge-director-trump-criticism-silly

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Spox: Federal Ethics Chief 'Silly' To Criticize Trump's Confict-of-Interest Plan (Original Post) DonViejo Jan 2017 OP
Because what you're saying is a bald faced lie. It doesn't matter what you say asshole me: onecaliberal Jan 2017 #1
"The president, by law, doesnt have conflicts" NYC Liberal Jan 2017 #2
He's bluffing! machoneman Jan 2017 #3
IT needs to go to the SCOTUS ASAP! lark Jan 2017 #5
I didn't realize Lindsay Jan 2017 #4
Follow up question should be: How did that work out for President Nixon? blm Jan 2017 #6
Gaslighting... Lithos Jan 2017 #7
As well as violations to RICO. BumRushDaShow Jan 2017 #9
It's just silly he can manipulate the stock market with a tweet. forgotmylogin Jan 2017 #8
The President can not have conflicts of interest does not mean everything is legal if Thor_MN Jan 2017 #10

machoneman

(3,999 posts)
3. He's bluffing!
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 12:53 PM
Jan 2017

Just wait until it gets to the Supreme Court asshole. They'll make mince-meat out of that silly lawyer.

lark

(23,065 posts)
5. IT needs to go to the SCOTUS ASAP!
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 12:57 PM
Jan 2017

Get this there before Drumpf can install his sister, hopefully one of the Repugs will actually have a conscience, although I know that's a lot to ask.

Lithos

(26,403 posts)
7. Gaslighting...
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 01:08 PM
Jan 2017

The issue is that Trump's conflicts of interests are so deep that he will be in violation of the Constitution's Emoluments clause day one as many of the international companies he works with are state owned agencies, or agents of the state owners.

Also, Bribery remains a crime.

L-

forgotmylogin

(7,521 posts)
8. It's just silly he can manipulate the stock market with a tweet.
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 01:11 PM
Jan 2017

And crash the stocks of companies he has grudges against with a fake piece of info.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
10. The President can not have conflicts of interest does not mean everything is legal if
Thu Jan 12, 2017, 09:05 PM
Jan 2017

you are the President. It means you can't be President if you have conflicts of interest.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Spox: Federal Ethics Chie...