Here are the lies Paul Ryan told about Obamacare during his town hall meeting
Source: LATimes
Michael HiltzikContact Reporter
We know that House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wisc.) is desperate to repeal the Affordable Care Act. What he never has been able to explain adequately is why.
http://www.trbimg.com/img-587951c2/turbine/la-1484330964-rhlfpu7pur-snap-embed/480/480x270
Arizona Republican Jeff Jeans confronts Ryan about Obamacare replacement during Thursday's town hall.
--Premium increases. Ryan maintains that premium increases for ACA plans are unsupportable for American families. He expounded on this issue in response to a question from Jeff Jeans, a member of the town hall audience. (See accompanying video.) Jeans described himself as a small business owner and Republican who had been dead set against Obamacare until he was diagnosed with cancer at age 49.
Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, Im standing here today alive, he said. I want to thank President Obama from the bottom of my heart, because I would be dead if not for him.
But when Jeans mentioned that he lived in Arizona, Ryan thought he had a gotcha. Pulling a note card from his pocket, he reeled off the premium increases for Arizona and a few other states for 2017. Arizona this year, the premium increases for people on Obamacare, 116%, he said. Oklahoma, Tennessee and Minnesota also had double-digit premium increases......................
A few points need to be made here. First, premiums and deductibles were rising before the ACA, and in many cases, the post-ACA increases are lower than before. Moreover, the four states Ryan mentioned were those with the highest increases in benchmark silver plans the figures Ryan was using -- for 2017. What he didnt mention was that increases in many other states were much lower. Arkansas, Ohio and New Hampshire 2%. In Massachusetts and Indiana, rates actually dropped. ...............
Read more: http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-obamacare-ryan-townhall-20170113-story.html
The LA headline actually called them LIES!!
TWEET
Los Angeles Times ?@latimes 2h2 hours ago
Here are the lies Paul Ryan told about Obamacare during his town hall meeting http://lat.ms/2itKRrq pic.twitter.com/2YYPPIYDDk
71 replies 723 retweets 544 likes
http://www.trbimg.com/img-5879175c/turbine/la-mhiltzik-1484330899-snap-photo/650/650x366
Ryan
House Speaker Paul Ryan, dancing as fast as he can during Thursday's town hall to explain why he's in such a hurry to repeal the Affordable Care Act. (CNN)
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)probably not.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)elmac
(4,642 posts)repeal will save the uber rich fascists about 15 million bucks a year or abour 2% of their income in taxes. They would murder to save a buck. They are a worse enemy then ISIL ever was.
myrna minx
(22,772 posts)Rustyeye77
(2,736 posts)elleng
(130,773 posts)He should live so long!
Maynar
(769 posts)But that's ok.
I get it.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)He will never live that long.
LittleGirl
(8,280 posts)I will be moving back to the states (jobless) in March and signed up for Obamacare to have some health insurance. I choose the silver plan because the premium plan is more expensive. (For AZ).
My rates:
670 bucks a month
4,600 deductible
8200 out of pocket max.
How is that affordable? My spouse will be in Europe with local healthcare here and it is no where near as expensive as this plan of mine. After the 2500 deductible, the insurance pays 90% of the costs. This for only 250 a month. Now, that's affordable.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,148 posts)and drug prices. Hospitals and clinics are non-profit (really non-profit).
LittleGirl
(8,280 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)FOR THE RIGHT while supposedly comparing a list of proposed pub health plan points to the ACA's. She explained, in a quick toss-off, that the pub's item "BARE-BONES COVERAGE" kinda just meant that people who didn't need it wouldn't be paying for maternity care.
Of course, BARE-BONES is just what it sounds like. Severely limited coverages for sure, plus they'd likely only kick in after significant deductibles are met and require purchasers to may high coinsurance percentages.
Camerota's "maternity" thing was meant to trigger approval among the ignorant. Right-wing scoundrels have been feeding them a lie that having healthy young people in their risk pools, the kind who may need maternity care but little else, raises premiums for older people with a whole host of problems. As in, "I'm 64. Why should I have to pay for people to have babies?"
Camerota when she was on Fox (obviously)
?itok=W_xjUNwU
riversedge
(70,095 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)reputable companies did/do sell honest bare-bones policies. Mostly to young, healthy people of course. A really scary option for others who couldn't afford more appropriate coverage, and those pub tax credits would guarantee millions of those.
DeminPennswoods
(15,265 posts)That's what people need to start asking because Congress' plan is the same as all federal gov't employees have, FEHB (fed emp health benefits). FEHB is exactly the same as the ACA market and very similar to the Medicare suppliment/advantage market. In fact, the ACA was modeled on FEHB. FEHB has national plans and state specific plans. Anyone can join one of their state's plans or any of the national plans.