Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,200 posts)
Fri Jan 27, 2017, 02:37 PM Jan 2017

Russia parliament votes 380-3 to decriminalize domestic violence

Source: usaToday




Doug Stanglin , USATODAY Published 9:33 a.m. ET Jan. 27, 2017 | Updated 3 hours ago
Play

A bill would eliminate criminal liability for domestic violence in Russia. Elizabeth Keatinge (@ekeatinge) has more. Buzz60
Russian Dumadomestic violence

(Photo: Alexander Zemlianichenko, AP)

Russia's parliament voted 380-3 on Friday to decriminalize domestic violence in cases where it does not cause "substantial bodily harm" and does not occur more than once a year.

The move, which eliminates criminal liability in such cases, makes a violation punishable by a fine of roughly $500, or a 15-day arrest, provided there is no repeat within 12 months.

The bill now goes to the rubber-stamp upper chamber, where no opposition is expected. It then must be signed by President Vladimir Putin, who has signaled his support.
..........................................
According to Russian government statistics from the Interior Ministry, 40% of all violent crimes are committed within the family. The figures correlate to 36,000 women being beaten by their partners every day and 26,000 children being assaulted by their parents every year.

Read more: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/01/27/russian-parliament-decrimiinalizes-domestic-violence/97129912/



This is disgusting!
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Russia parliament votes 380-3 to decriminalize domestic violence (Original Post) riversedge Jan 2017 OP
I fear for those three, whoever they are. LisaM Jan 2017 #1
maggots MFM008 Jan 2017 #2
Wow Lucky Luciano Jan 2017 #3
Sitting here myself saying WOW also.........What could possibly go wrong? Old Vet Jan 2017 #13
A glimpse into our own future. johnp3907 Jan 2017 #4
Yes it is. pangaia Jan 2017 #6
Which I'm sure will be wrapped in a bible verse Blue Idaho Jan 2017 #7
"Hey Bannon, get to work on something like this will ya?" tenorly Jan 2017 #5
Don't even joke about that. pangaia Jan 2017 #8
How could a human-sized man allow himself to look like that? Judi Lynn Jan 2017 #20
Good question, Judi. We reflect our emotional age, I suppose. tenorly Jan 2017 #21
I'm shocked Lokilooney Jan 2017 #9
Something else for trump to admire about the Russians. (nt) Paladin Jan 2017 #10
Why? IronLionZion Jan 2017 #11
I wonder if the 3 parliamentarians who had the courage to vote against True Dough Jan 2017 #12
How about you may beat your wife... malthaussen Jan 2017 #14
Thats the new procedure I think. drray23 Jan 2017 #15
Government is often a reflection of the family and vice versa Phoenix61 Jan 2017 #16
So I guess that will mean an immediate drop in crime in Russia 7962 Jan 2017 #17
Beyond disgusting. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2017 #18
Doesn't seem possible. If it passes, expect a female exodus, and god help those who don't leave. n/t Judi Lynn Jan 2017 #19

Judi Lynn

(160,525 posts)
20. How could a human-sized man allow himself to look like that?
Fri Jan 27, 2017, 06:21 PM
Jan 2017

It's a four-hundred pound two year old.

Hideous.

tenorly

(2,037 posts)
21. Good question, Judi. We reflect our emotional age, I suppose.
Fri Jan 27, 2017, 06:38 PM
Jan 2017

As you've no doubt noticed, we guys tend to take longer to mature than ladies - so our emotional age tends to lag already as it is (yours truly, for example).

Now, if you have someone who reached adulthood as an emotional toddler, and then had his every whim catered to for decades and decades, that person will probably be a real brat no matter how old or important they are - and the more important they are, the worse it probably gets (especially as old age begins to set in).

Hence, Trump!

[center]

Careful now. Big Baby's watching you.[/center]

IronLionZion

(45,433 posts)
11. Why?
Fri Jan 27, 2017, 03:08 PM
Jan 2017



In November, prosecutors began investigating a police officer who took a call from a woman complaining about her boyfriend’s aggressive behavior. Instead of offering help, the officer reportedly told the woman that the police would only come if she got killed. Shortly afterward the man beat the woman to death.


Oh I see that the RW politicians claim it's for family values. And that criminalizing domestic violence is anti-family somehow.

Would it be different if feminists beat their husbands?

True Dough

(17,303 posts)
12. I wonder if the 3 parliamentarians who had the courage to vote against
Fri Jan 27, 2017, 03:27 PM
Jan 2017

this disgusting piece of legislation will face consequences?

What a backwards country!

drray23

(7,627 posts)
15. Thats the new procedure I think.
Fri Jan 27, 2017, 04:15 PM
Jan 2017

We first pass a law in the douma, then it gets passed in the US house and senate for Trump to sign it..

Phoenix61

(17,003 posts)
16. Government is often a reflection of the family and vice versa
Fri Jan 27, 2017, 04:38 PM
Jan 2017

Our first society is our family. In a patriarchy, power is held by one. Discussion about decisions may occur but with an understanding that differing points of view may or may not be taken into consideration. Once a decision is made, it is to be obeyed not questioned. This early programming fits in with the goals of a totalitarian government.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russia parliament votes 3...