Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 02:07 PM Jul 2012

California parks director resigns amid scandal

Source: Sacramento Bee

State Parks Director Ruth Coleman resigned this morning and her second in command has been fired after officials learned the department has been sitting on nearly $54 million in surplus money for as long as 12 years.

The moves come in the wake of a scandal, revealed by The Bee on Sunday, in which a deputy director at State Parks carried out a secret vacation buyout program for employees at department headquarters last year. That buyout cost the state more than $271,000.

... The department sat on the money for unknown reasons even as it carried out, over the past year, the unprecedented closure of 70 parks to satisfy state budget cuts.

Most of those closures did not occur because nonprofits and local governments found money to take over the parks. The money could also have prevented drastic cutbacks in hours, staffing and services that have stricken nearly every park in the state over the past two years.

Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/07/20/4645141/state-parks-director-resigns.html

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California parks director resigns amid scandal (Original Post) Newsjock Jul 2012 OP
Wow... that is crushingly lame XemaSab Jul 2012 #1
This is a mind boggler - cannot figure the motivation n/t radhika Jul 2012 #2
She's taking behavioral cues from some of our furry woodland creatures slackmaster Jul 2012 #14
I was thinking the same thing Mrs. Ted Nancy Jul 2012 #43
hypothesis: once parks aren't used or kept up, they're "surplus" state properties that can be sold wordpix Jul 2012 #37
Betcha Coleman and her second are RWers who deliberately sabotaged parks finances. kestrel91316 Jul 2012 #3
Did she have ties to corporations wanting to take over the parks? AnotherDreamWeaver Jul 2012 #4
Bingo. Read this whistleblower interview about a coverup that goes to the top: Liberty Belle Jul 2012 #34
this burns me up! BigWind and BigSolar are almost as bad as BigOil wordpix Jul 2012 #38
$10,000? bluedigger Jul 2012 #5
Mike Thompson's a good guy XemaSab Jul 2012 #8
Then I'm baffled. Somebody is either incompetent or doing some internal sabotage. kestrel91316 Jul 2012 #16
Both her former employees are Dems. dixiegrrrrl Jul 2012 #26
Is this a happy ending? Baitball Blogger Jul 2012 #6
I wonder what the governor will do with that surplus cash AsahinaKimi Jul 2012 #7
Why not use it for, I dunno XemaSab Jul 2012 #9
With that much cash... AsahinaKimi Jul 2012 #10
No, it should go to the parks obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #12
It won't cover a lot 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #25
Yes it will. All but 5 of the 70 parks set for closure have been saved. Liberty Belle Jul 2012 #35
It should be used for the parks! obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #11
I AGREE but thats MUCHO DINERO AsahinaKimi Jul 2012 #13
Well we have a hell of a lot of parks, and they are suffering years of neglect. kestrel91316 Jul 2012 #18
And $22 million of that was needed to forestall closing 70 parks this year. Gormy Cuss Jul 2012 #29
But that is money tagged for the parks obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #21
"...Laird said the discovered funds are xxqqqzme Jul 2012 #15
It should be used for the purpose for which it was collected. bluedigger Jul 2012 #17
It was supposed to operate the parks in the 1st place and should be used that way CreekDog Jul 2012 #19
okay heres a question AsahinaKimi Jul 2012 #20
I imagine the money discovery is the 54 million, there isn't some separate pot of interest CreekDog Jul 2012 #22
Why would any be left over? obamanut2012 Jul 2012 #23
AsahinaKimi tru Jul 2012 #30
Odd 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #24
And how does 54 million not get noticed in the state budget? dixiegrrrrl Jul 2012 #27
They hid it away and didn't report it... Blue_Tires Jul 2012 #31
The question should be Politicalboi Jul 2012 #28
That's why a director has to be honest Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2012 #33
I am still trying to figure out the California State System ... bayareaboy Jul 2012 #32
you won't go to any CA state park because of those actions? CreekDog Jul 2012 #36
give him a break - he volunteered for 8 yrs. wordpix Jul 2012 #39
I tried but it is pretty tough to get a Redwood to hold a pen ... bayareaboy Jul 2012 #42
No, the whole system for the California State Parks has been in chaos for years ... bayareaboy Jul 2012 #41
Hopefully they can do something about Mitchell Caverns State Park aint_no_life_nowhere Jul 2012 #40
jail TeamPooka Jul 2012 #44

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
37. hypothesis: once parks aren't used or kept up, they're "surplus" state properties that can be sold
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 10:56 PM
Jul 2012

and BINGO, we have more gated communities for the 1%

Liberty Belle

(9,534 posts)
34. Bingo. Read this whistleblower interview about a coverup that goes to the top:
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 10:44 PM
Jul 2012
http://eastcountymagazine.org/node/9161

She either ordered, or went along with, a gag order to muzzle state park employees at Anza Borrego Desert State Park from speaking out about damaging impacts of a big energy project proposed on BLM land that shared a 5-mile border with the State Park. So the final EIR for the project including ZERO discussion of impacts on the Park, which is mind-blowing.

We know the gag order wasn't issued locally. It came from Sacramento. The State Parks director had to be complicit; if she had any backbone she should have insisted that comments be submitted for the EIR on this damaging project.

Who gained? A huge wind company owned by an oil company.

State Parks and the Governor officially denied the gag order. So then why was not comment submitted for the EIR, even though staff spent months preparing one? The gag order claimed by this whistleblower, the park's former superintendent, was later confirmed by another newspaper, the Borrego Sun, which found multiple sources who confirmed the coverup. (The Sun is a print-only, no online edition.)

Here is what the desert next to the park looks like now; the project is not yet completed but they have destroyed thousands of square miles of once pristine desert land. Soon 100+ turbines each 450 feet tall with bladespans the size of football fields will be going up, complete with flashing lights, noise, etc. What a wilderness experience. The land dissects endangered bighorn sheep habitat so Secretary Salazar issued a take permit that allows them to be killed.

This is what excavation for just one turbine pad looks like; over a hundred more are planned; note how it dwarfs the mountains in the background:



wordpix

(18,652 posts)
38. this burns me up! BigWind and BigSolar are almost as bad as BigOil
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 11:01 PM
Jul 2012

I've been a major solar, wind, conservation and biomass advocate for years, but these huge mega projects miles from cities are just plain stupid. Why not have a small wind turbine in every backyard or solar panels on every roof, instead of destroying the environment for MegaWind & Solar projects?

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
5. $10,000?
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 02:28 PM
Jul 2012

"Before coming to State Parks, Ms. Coleman worked in the state capitol as Policy Director for Assemblywoman Helen Thomson, and Legislative Director for State Senator Mike Thompson focusing on environmental legislation such as, salmon and steelhead restoration, the protection of the Headwaters Forest, park bonds, water bonds, agriculture policy and water policy.

Ms. Coleman also has worked for the Air Resources Board in the electric vehicle program and the Office of the Legislative Analyst, focusing on fiscal and policy issues in the natural resources area, particularly the Department of Parks and Recreation and the Department of Fish and Game. Prior to her work in Sacramento, she spent three years as a Peace Corps Volunteer in Swaziland, Southern Africa."
http://www.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=22217

"Helen MacLeod Thomson is a member of the Yolo County Board of Supervisors and a former Democratic assemblywoman from California's 8th Assembly district. Thomson was first elected to the assembly in 1996 and served three two-year terms. She was the first of what have become three consecutive women from Davis to be elected to this seat, followed by Lois Wolk and Mariko Yamada."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Thomson

"Thompson is the co-founder and co-chair of the bipartisan Congressional Wine Caucus, which consists of over 215 U.S. Senators and House members. He is also a member and former co-chair of the Congressional Sportsmen's Caucus. He is also a member of the Blue Dog Coalition, which is composed of moderate Democrats committed to bipartisan problem solving."
http://mikethompson.house.gov/Biography/

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
7. I wonder what the governor will do with that surplus cash
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 02:34 PM
Jul 2012

Lets hope he uses some of it for California infrastructure.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
10. With that much cash...
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 02:39 PM
Jul 2012

maybe AFTER THE FUCKING PARKS ... they can put some to California Infrastructure...ya think?

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
25. It won't cover a lot
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:04 PM
Jul 2012

when their state deficit is in the billions.

Like finding a twenty in your pocket when your house is being foreclosed on. Nice . .. but it won't make any real impact

Liberty Belle

(9,534 posts)
35. Yes it will. All but 5 of the 70 parks set for closure have been saved.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 10:47 PM
Jul 2012

Use it to save the last 5. The other 65 had nonprofits or community groups that raised money to keep the parks open.

The amount to save a park isn't much. We helped save Palomar State Park. It only took $60,000 to keep the doors open, and that's a park on top of a mountain with heavy snows, so lots of maintenance and snow plowing needed. Some that are just little museums could be kept running, perhaps with reduced hours, for a fraction of this sum.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
13. I AGREE but thats MUCHO DINERO
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 02:42 PM
Jul 2012

There should be enough for other things as well. $54 million is a hell of a lot.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
29. And $22 million of that was needed to forestall closing 70 parks this year.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:53 PM
Jul 2012

It's unlikely that the funding fairy is going be any kinder to the parks in the next couple of years. Either it should be used to increase infrastructure now or to keep the gates open next year -- no way this money should go back into the general fund.

xxqqqzme

(14,887 posts)
15. "...Laird said the discovered funds are
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 02:45 PM
Jul 2012

"one-time" money and it will be up to the Legislature to decide how to use it. It should go to the parks.

(John Laird - secretary of the state Natural Resources Agency, which oversees State Parks)

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
17. It should be used for the purpose for which it was collected.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 02:49 PM
Jul 2012

Given that a big chunk of it was in the OHV fund I would guess she was fine with collecting fees, but disapproved of the uses which they were authorized for.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
19. It was supposed to operate the parks in the 1st place and should be used that way
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 02:52 PM
Jul 2012

it may be the difference in keeping some parks open and were that surplus not hidden, those slated for closure need not have been threatened.

For what it's worth, 50 million only buys this much infrastructure:

about 1% of the new eastern span of the Bay Bridge.

OR

less than 5% of the Chinatown subway.

OR

about 10% of the Oakland AIRBART extension.

OR

about 1% of the new planned LA Metro subway line from downtown LA to Santa Monica.

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
20. okay heres a question
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 02:57 PM
Jul 2012

That money was kept some where right? I would imagine that money might have made some interest? And..Yes I do want to see it go for the parks, but if there was enough left over, shouldn't SOME OF IT it go to other things California desperately needs? I guess as an above poster previously stated, it will be up to the State Legislature. Thy will be done..... I guess.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
22. I imagine the money discovery is the 54 million, there isn't some separate pot of interest
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:00 PM
Jul 2012

if there was, unless this has been going on for decades, i can't imagine it's very much, what with interest rates being low in recent years.

obamanut2012

(26,068 posts)
23. Why would any be left over?
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:02 PM
Jul 2012

I doubt that is enough to come close to improving the infrastructure of the parks, as well as everything else the state parks need.

 

tru

(237 posts)
30. AsahinaKimi
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 04:37 PM
Jul 2012

There will be no money "left over." Do you have any idea how parks and natural areas have been starved for funds for years, and how much money they will need in the future?

The state legislature and anyone else who wants to steal this money from the parks is playing into the hands of rightwingers.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
24. Odd
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 03:03 PM
Jul 2012

why sit on that much when they're closing parks?

A rainy-day fund I could see, but it was raining.

Oh I get it now: State Parks Director Ron Swanson . . .

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
31. They hid it away and didn't report it...
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 04:45 PM
Jul 2012

Maybe someone was setting up for a secret transfer to an offshore account?

bayareaboy

(793 posts)
32. I am still trying to figure out the California State System ...
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 04:48 PM
Jul 2012


When I retired I worked for years as a volunteer at State Parks from the bay area to Humboldt County. After eight years I had an accident tearing out a rotator cuff. The Office staff did not want to record the accident. They did not want to cover the accident on Workers Comp. Well I got my way and was asked to leave the park ASAP.

I like the Parks, having spent a lot of my life there and even enjoy most of the workers there, and always like the Camping folks that I met.

But it will be a cold day, if I ever go in a California State Park again

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
39. give him a break - he volunteered for 8 yrs.
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 11:07 PM
Jul 2012

He deserved Workman's Comp for being injured on the job. Can't blame him for being a little irritated.

OTOH, it's not the parks' fault.

bayareaboy

(793 posts)
42. I tried but it is pretty tough to get a Redwood to hold a pen ...
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 10:44 PM
Jul 2012

After all they don't have opposible thumbs!

bayareaboy

(793 posts)
41. No, the whole system for the California State Parks has been in chaos for years ...
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 10:39 PM
Jul 2012

Ever since RR put a bunch of wing nuts into the system it has become a problem. Do you recall that?

Perhaps not, right!

It hasn't gotten any better, especially after the State Dept of Rec. bought a bunch of land all over the state without any figuring what to do with the lands, so much more money is spent trying to keep those lands in check for further "maybe" Parks.

I could go on but it seems that you really didn't read my first post, this is probably enough, this time.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
40. Hopefully they can do something about Mitchell Caverns State Park
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 11:25 PM
Jul 2012

The park has been closed for awhile now because of the California budget problems. The park only had two rangers living near the cavern entrance but they couldn't even afford to continue that. Not long ago, vandals broke into the caverns' visitor center and stole or destroyed things, including stealing the generators and wiring for the lighting system. They did $100,000 worth of damage. Fortunately, none of the rare and beautiful formations of the caverns were destroyed. But the caverns remain very vulnerable with no one around, in a remote section of the Mojave Desert. They're the only limestone show caverns in the California state park system.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»California parks director...