California parks director resigns amid scandal
Source: Sacramento Bee
State Parks Director Ruth Coleman resigned this morning and her second in command has been fired after officials learned the department has been sitting on nearly $54 million in surplus money for as long as 12 years.
The moves come in the wake of a scandal, revealed by The Bee on Sunday, in which a deputy director at State Parks carried out a secret vacation buyout program for employees at department headquarters last year. That buyout cost the state more than $271,000.
... The department sat on the money for unknown reasons even as it carried out, over the past year, the unprecedented closure of 70 parks to satisfy state budget cuts.
Most of those closures did not occur because nonprofits and local governments found money to take over the parks. The money could also have prevented drastic cutbacks in hours, staffing and services that have stricken nearly every park in the state over the past two years.
Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/07/20/4645141/state-parks-director-resigns.html
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)Shame on her!
radhika
(1,008 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Mrs. Ted Nancy
(462 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)and BINGO, we have more gated communities for the 1%
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)AnotherDreamWeaver
(2,850 posts)Liberty Belle
(9,534 posts)She either ordered, or went along with, a gag order to muzzle state park employees at Anza Borrego Desert State Park from speaking out about damaging impacts of a big energy project proposed on BLM land that shared a 5-mile border with the State Park. So the final EIR for the project including ZERO discussion of impacts on the Park, which is mind-blowing.
We know the gag order wasn't issued locally. It came from Sacramento. The State Parks director had to be complicit; if she had any backbone she should have insisted that comments be submitted for the EIR on this damaging project.
Who gained? A huge wind company owned by an oil company.
State Parks and the Governor officially denied the gag order. So then why was not comment submitted for the EIR, even though staff spent months preparing one? The gag order claimed by this whistleblower, the park's former superintendent, was later confirmed by another newspaper, the Borrego Sun, which found multiple sources who confirmed the coverup. (The Sun is a print-only, no online edition.)
Here is what the desert next to the park looks like now; the project is not yet completed but they have destroyed thousands of square miles of once pristine desert land. Soon 100+ turbines each 450 feet tall with bladespans the size of football fields will be going up, complete with flashing lights, noise, etc. What a wilderness experience. The land dissects endangered bighorn sheep habitat so Secretary Salazar issued a take permit that allows them to be killed.
This is what excavation for just one turbine pad looks like; over a hundred more are planned; note how it dwarfs the mountains in the background:
wordpix
(18,652 posts)I've been a major solar, wind, conservation and biomass advocate for years, but these huge mega projects miles from cities are just plain stupid. Why not have a small wind turbine in every backyard or solar panels on every roof, instead of destroying the environment for MegaWind & Solar projects?
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)"Before coming to State Parks, Ms. Coleman worked in the state capitol as Policy Director for Assemblywoman Helen Thomson, and Legislative Director for State Senator Mike Thompson focusing on environmental legislation such as, salmon and steelhead restoration, the protection of the Headwaters Forest, park bonds, water bonds, agriculture policy and water policy.
Ms. Coleman also has worked for the Air Resources Board in the electric vehicle program and the Office of the Legislative Analyst, focusing on fiscal and policy issues in the natural resources area, particularly the Department of Parks and Recreation and the Department of Fish and Game. Prior to her work in Sacramento, she spent three years as a Peace Corps Volunteer in Swaziland, Southern Africa."
http://www.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=22217
"Helen MacLeod Thomson is a member of the Yolo County Board of Supervisors and a former Democratic assemblywoman from California's 8th Assembly district. Thomson was first elected to the assembly in 1996 and served three two-year terms. She was the first of what have become three consecutive women from Davis to be elected to this seat, followed by Lois Wolk and Mariko Yamada."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Thomson
"Thompson is the co-founder and co-chair of the bipartisan Congressional Wine Caucus, which consists of over 215 U.S. Senators and House members. He is also a member and former co-chair of the Congressional Sportsmen's Caucus. He is also a member of the Blue Dog Coalition, which is composed of moderate Democrats committed to bipartisan problem solving."
http://mikethompson.house.gov/Biography/
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,699 posts)Do we now have the money to save California parks?
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)Lets hope he uses some of it for California infrastructure.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)THE FUCKING PARKS?!?!?!
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)maybe AFTER THE FUCKING PARKS ... they can put some to California Infrastructure...ya think?
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)when their state deficit is in the billions.
Like finding a twenty in your pocket when your house is being foreclosed on. Nice . .. but it won't make any real impact
Liberty Belle
(9,534 posts)Use it to save the last 5. The other 65 had nonprofits or community groups that raised money to keep the parks open.
The amount to save a park isn't much. We helped save Palomar State Park. It only took $60,000 to keep the doors open, and that's a park on top of a mountain with heavy snows, so lots of maintenance and snow plowing needed. Some that are just little museums could be kept running, perhaps with reduced hours, for a fraction of this sum.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)There should be enough for other things as well. $54 million is a hell of a lot.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)It's unlikely that the funding fairy is going be any kinder to the parks in the next couple of years. Either it should be used to increase infrastructure now or to keep the gates open next year -- no way this money should go back into the general fund.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)Not for anything else. It should be used for the parks.
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)"one-time" money and it will be up to the Legislature to decide how to use it. It should go to the parks.
(John Laird - secretary of the state Natural Resources Agency, which oversees State Parks)
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)Given that a big chunk of it was in the OHV fund I would guess she was fine with collecting fees, but disapproved of the uses which they were authorized for.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)it may be the difference in keeping some parks open and were that surplus not hidden, those slated for closure need not have been threatened.
For what it's worth, 50 million only buys this much infrastructure:
about 1% of the new eastern span of the Bay Bridge.
OR
less than 5% of the Chinatown subway.
OR
about 10% of the Oakland AIRBART extension.
OR
about 1% of the new planned LA Metro subway line from downtown LA to Santa Monica.
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)That money was kept some where right? I would imagine that money might have made some interest? And..Yes I do want to see it go for the parks, but if there was enough left over, shouldn't SOME OF IT it go to other things California desperately needs? I guess as an above poster previously stated, it will be up to the State Legislature. Thy will be done..... I guess.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)if there was, unless this has been going on for decades, i can't imagine it's very much, what with interest rates being low in recent years.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)I doubt that is enough to come close to improving the infrastructure of the parks, as well as everything else the state parks need.
tru
(237 posts)There will be no money "left over." Do you have any idea how parks and natural areas have been starved for funds for years, and how much money they will need in the future?
The state legislature and anyone else who wants to steal this money from the parks is playing into the hands of rightwingers.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)why sit on that much when they're closing parks?
A rainy-day fund I could see, but it was raining.
Oh I get it now: State Parks Director Ron Swanson . . .
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Maybe someone was setting up for a secret transfer to an offshore account?
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Is how can one person have this much control without oversight?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)[img][/img]
bayareaboy
(793 posts)When I retired I worked for years as a volunteer at State Parks from the bay area to Humboldt County. After eight years I had an accident tearing out a rotator cuff. The Office staff did not want to record the accident. They did not want to cover the accident on Workers Comp. Well I got my way and was asked to leave the park ASAP.
I like the Parks, having spent a lot of my life there and even enjoy most of the workers there, and always like the Camping folks that I met.
But it will be a cold day, if I ever go in a California State Park again
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)He deserved Workman's Comp for being injured on the job. Can't blame him for being a little irritated.
OTOH, it's not the parks' fault.
bayareaboy
(793 posts)After all they don't have opposible thumbs!
bayareaboy
(793 posts)Ever since RR put a bunch of wing nuts into the system it has become a problem. Do you recall that?
Perhaps not, right!
It hasn't gotten any better, especially after the State Dept of Rec. bought a bunch of land all over the state without any figuring what to do with the lands, so much more money is spent trying to keep those lands in check for further "maybe" Parks.
I could go on but it seems that you really didn't read my first post, this is probably enough, this time.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)The park has been closed for awhile now because of the California budget problems. The park only had two rangers living near the cavern entrance but they couldn't even afford to continue that. Not long ago, vandals broke into the caverns' visitor center and stole or destroyed things, including stealing the generators and wiring for the lighting system. They did $100,000 worth of damage. Fortunately, none of the rare and beautiful formations of the caverns were destroyed. But the caverns remain very vulnerable with no one around, in a remote section of the Mojave Desert. They're the only limestone show caverns in the California state park system.
TeamPooka
(24,221 posts)resignations won't keep you out of it.