Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Drum

(9,154 posts)
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 03:33 PM Apr 2017

U.S. Said to Weigh Military Responses to Syrian Chemical Attack

Source: New York Times

WASHINGTON — Senior Defense Department officials are developing options for a military strike in response to the Syrian government’s chemical weapons attack that killed dozens of civilians on Tuesday, officials said on Thursday.

The top-level consultations about military options involve Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as well as military officers at the United States Central Command.

Mr. Mattis is traveling to Florida, where he is expected to discuss the crisis in Syria with President Trump. Officials said no decisions had been made.

American intelligence has established with high confidence that a Syrian government aircraft carried out the attack, a senior American official said.

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/world/middleeast/us-said-to-weigh-military-responses-to-syrian-chemical-attack.html

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Said to Weigh Military Responses to Syrian Chemical Attack (Original Post) Drum Apr 2017 OP
"American intelligence"? Must be a hoax. #MAGA! Cattledog Apr 2017 #1
Exact same options Obama had. yallerdawg Apr 2017 #2
Let's See Gymbo Apr 2017 #3
Don't they realize... atreides1 Apr 2017 #4
+1 FailureToCommunicate Apr 2017 #5
food for thought bluestarone Apr 2017 #6
What would a bombing accomplish? Yavin4 Apr 2017 #7
Breaking on MSNBC right now: 50 Tomahawk missiles hit a Syrian airfield. Hayabusa Apr 2017 #8

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
2. Exact same options Obama had.
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 03:45 PM
Apr 2017

Except there are a lot more Russians now!

Gorsuch and Xi. The power of distraction.

Or inability to maintain more than one thought at a time?

Gymbo

(133 posts)
3. Let's See
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 03:47 PM
Apr 2017

Falling poll numbers, Russian questions, failed agenda, no health care solution, pulled promises, of course we're going to bomb and we are going to bomb soon.

atreides1

(16,072 posts)
4. Don't they realize...
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 03:56 PM
Apr 2017

...that within 24 hours of briefing Trump, Putin will have all of the same information...which means Assad will know in 36 hours!!!

bluestarone

(16,906 posts)
6. food for thought
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 08:38 PM
Apr 2017

Just thinking, Wouldn't it be just like Putin to Capture (kill) Assad?? Making him (Putin) a good boy to Trump!!! And wouldn't that be something?? Wouldn't surprise me at all.

Yavin4

(35,437 posts)
7. What would a bombing accomplish?
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 09:03 PM
Apr 2017

Okay, so you bomb Syria. Then what? Assad will still be in power. Won't change a damn thing.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Said to Weigh Milita...