Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

El Supremo

(20,365 posts)
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 07:18 PM Jul 2012

Cameras denied for Aurora theater shooting suspect's next court date

Source: Denver Post

....Eighteenth Judicial District Chief Judge William Sylvester on Tuesday denied a request for video and still cameras to document the hearing this coming Monday at the Arapahoe County courthouse. Sylvester's order says he weighed whether allowing cameras in the courtroom would interfere with Holmes' right to a fair trial or would be too disruptive.

In making his decision, Sylvester said he considered the objection of Holmes' attorneys to the presence of cameras. It's unclear what the attorneys wrote in their motion because it is sealed, along with the rest of the case file.

The hearing, "is open to the media and to the general public, so the media and public will have ready access to the proceeding," Sylvester wrote in his order.

One video and one still camera were permitted in the courtroom Monday when Holmes made his first appearance before a judge. Images of Holmes with a blank expression on his face, occasionally spreading his eyes wide or appearing to dose off, led to widespread debate about whether Holmes is mentally unwell, drugged or faking.

Read more: http://www.denverpost.com/theatershooting/ci_21148057/cameras-denied-aurora-theater-shooting-suspects-next-court



He cannot get a fair trial in Arapahoe County. I know. I live here. Too many people are already convinced he's guilty.

If he is found competent to stand trial, it will be in some other county.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cameras denied for Aurora theater shooting suspect's next court date (Original Post) El Supremo Jul 2012 OP
The elite media must be hysterical and beside themselves bluestateguy Jul 2012 #1
THAT is good news Jessy169 Jul 2012 #2
Do you mean the public has no right to see the trial unless they're there in person? lunatica Jul 2012 #5
It's still up to the judge's discretion on what he allows in his courtroom... Blue_Tires Jul 2012 #6
I don't have a problem with that lunatica Jul 2012 #7
Apparently only the cameras are banned. Remmah2 Jul 2012 #8
Its a serious matter - not a poppy show. dipsydoodle Jul 2012 #3
Post removed Post removed Jul 2012 #4
Reduction in media hype. Remmah2 Jul 2012 #9

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
1. The elite media must be hysterical and beside themselves
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 07:27 PM
Jul 2012

And anything that pisses off the corporate, establishmentarian media I am all for.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
5. Do you mean the public has no right to see the trial unless they're there in person?
Wed Jul 25, 2012, 07:13 AM
Jul 2012

Trials are public. They're not supposed to be hidden or privatized or kept secret behind closed doors. If they allow the general public and trial artists in then why not cameras, especially when they're kept stationary? Gawking has nothing to do with it. We live in an age where the general public is all over the world and connected digitally to what interests them.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
7. I don't have a problem with that
Wed Jul 25, 2012, 08:59 AM
Jul 2012

Since that has always been the case and is an established rule.

But aside from the gawking or media circus there are hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people who want to watch these high profile trials, because they're interested in the process and how it works. It's educational and informative and heaven knows the people can use some education in this country. Otherwise you would have one group of elites knowing the laws and the process and another group calling for lynchings with nothing in between.

 

Remmah2

(3,291 posts)
8. Apparently only the cameras are banned.
Wed Jul 25, 2012, 09:02 AM
Jul 2012

Looks like reporters are allowed.

Time for the courtroom sketch artist.

Response to El Supremo (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Cameras denied for Aurora...