Senate Judiciary Chair: 'I Would Expect' A Supreme Court Vacancy This Summer
Source: Talking Points Memo
By MATT SHUHAM Published APRIL 20, 2017, 10:00 AM EDT
The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Tuesday that he expected a new vacancy to open on the Supreme Court within months.
I would expect a resignation this summer, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said at a National Association of Manufacturers event in Muscatine, Iowa, the Muscatine Journal reported.
Grassley made the comment in response to a question about the court during a Q&A at the event, according to the paper. He said a resignation was rumored, and that he expected President Donald Trumps next nominee to the high court to be picked from the same list as Justice Neil Gorsuch.
I dont know about racial and ethnic divisions, but theres some very good females on there that would make good Supreme Court Justices as well, he said, according to the paper.
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/chuck-grassley-i-would-expect-supreme-court-vacancy-this-summer
2naSalit
(86,323 posts)So who are they gonna kill?
Orsino
(37,428 posts)...and he is being nudged into retirement.
I'm so tired of this cabal. I wonder if I'll live long enough to see them in shackles.
JudyM
(29,192 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)JudyM
(29,192 posts)cstanleytech
(26,231 posts)been the same unless of course Gorsuch is as skilled a ventriloquist as Scalia and is going to take over the job of having a hand up Clarences ass.
itcfish
(1,828 posts)rid of Ruth. She should have a body guard. God give her good health for many years.
bucolic_frolic
(43,044 posts)Clarence Thomas has timed his intentions for awhile
The coast is clear for them
DrToast
(6,414 posts)Especially since his BFF is gone.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)"I would like to thank the men and females of our great Supreme Court for........" said Chucker Aassleey.
Stupid fuck... all of them......
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)I suspect...
turbinetree
(24,683 posts)advising and consenting while he was sitting on the toilet with it wiping his ....................with it.
FU Grassley, you have no principles ------------none , zilch, nada, zero.
AS far as I can see, any "new" justice will be illegitimate , there was one man that didn't have the opportunity to be advised and consented from the past administration there chuckie, so again FU
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Supposedly he's been talking with friends and family about retiring. As the most moderate of the non-liberals and an occasional swing voter, this will be really bad news if so.
Retiring now would be no act of moderation but rather the placing of a heavy weight on the conservative side of the scale.
Yupster
(14,308 posts)that Kennedy would retire knowing his seat would be replaced by someone similar to his friend.
It didn't make sense to me. If they're such good friends, you'd think he'd want to serve at least one year with him.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Last edited Sun Apr 23, 2017, 08:22 AM - Edit history (1)
cases over many years because he was its most moderate member. Definitely conservative, he nevertheless often enraged the right into excoriating him as a damned liberal. Why would he want to set the court on a hard-right course that deviated so strongly from his own legacy of relative moderation?
Frankly, after having seen the devastating effects on our nation of conservative decisions on election finance and lightening of protections on minorities and employees, plus much else, retiring at this time would seem to suggest that he mostly approved of a fundamental, strong right furn for our nation.
Which is contradicted by some of his latest decisions, and his concept of "dignity" as a guiding principle. And Justice O'Connor on leaving the court admitted, "It's my party that's destroying the country." They've had all the more reason to be sure of that since then.
no_hypocrisy
(46,020 posts)Bayard
(22,005 posts)Vultures waiting for Bader-Ginsberg to kick.
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)But if it's Kennedy or the liberal set than watch out. I think the goal is to get the elderly conservative justices to retire and replace them with youngins
lark
(23,061 posts)He always shows his hand by claiming other people did stuff that he's either done or is planning to do.
Remember how he carried on about Dems killing Scalia, despite Scalia's very bad heart? Was it because he's planning on making sure RBG doesn't continue? I'm sure it really stung as well as pissed off Jabba when the very tiny RBG came out against him and he never lets go of a slight. That's why Repugs are getting so blatant, they think they will have a 6-4 majority and can turn us into the 4th Reich or Teahadistan by controlling every phase of the government.
I hope she and Bryer have some truly great security.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)worth not voting for HRC even though the court was at stake. Especially with Scalia already dead.
But it wasn't enough to deny the White House to Clinton. Comey and the FBI had to rig the election.
bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)Control-Z
(15,682 posts)athena
(4,187 posts)Ugh.
Whenever a man refers to a woman as "a female", I know that he has a hard time seeing women as his equals. I never hear such men refer to a man as "a male". It goes hand in hand with the attitude that women should not have a say over what happens to our bodies.
Baconator
(1,459 posts)Last edited Mon Apr 24, 2017, 03:21 PM - Edit history (1)
It's the discrepancy between men and females that makes it sound so weird in this context I think.
athena
(4,187 posts)It's only when men are referred to as "men", and women are "females" that I get annoyed.
I can understand and respect that the military and the police force might like to systematically use "male" and "female" instead of "man" and "woman".
Calista241
(5,586 posts)I just know it. That bastard.
Baconator
(1,459 posts)He likes lording it over the primary losers.
golfguru
(4,987 posts)Now that is one nomination which deserves full force opposition.