Russia is sending weapons to Taliban, top U.S. general confirms
Source: Washington Post
Russia is sending weapons to Taliban, top U.S. general confirms
By Thomas Gibbons-Neff April 24 at 12:56 PM
KABUL The general in charge of U.S. forces in Afghanistan appeared to confirm Monday that Russia is sending weapons to the Taliban, an intervention that will likely further complicate the 15-year-old war here and the Kremlins relations with the United States. ... When asked by reporters, Gen. John Nicholson did not dispute claims that the Taliban is receiving weapons and other supplies from the Russians.
We continue to get reports of this assistance, Nicholson said, speaking to reporters alongside Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. We support anyone who wants to help us advance the reconciliation process, but anyone who arms belligerents who perpetuate attacks like the one we saw two days ago in Mazar-e Sharif is not the best way forward to a peaceful reconciliation.
{While the U.S. wasnt looking, Russia and Iran began carving out a bigger role in Afghanistan}
A senior U.S. military official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence on the issue, said the Russians have increased their supply of equipment and small arms to the Taliban over the past 18 months. The official said the Russians have been sending weapons, including medium and heavy machine guns, to the Taliban under the guise that the material would be used to fight the Islamic State in eastern Afghanistan. Instead, the official said, the weapons were showing up in some of Afghanistans southern provinces, including Helmand and Kandahar both areas with little Islamic State presence.
Any weapons being funneled here from a foreign country would be a violation of international law unless they were coming to the government of Afghanistan, Mattis said, speaking during his first visit to Afghanistan as defense secretary. He added that it would have to be dealt with as such.
....
Thomas Gibbons-Neff is a staff writer and a former Marine infantryman. Follow @Tmgneff
https://twitter.com/Tmgneff
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2017/04/24/russia-is-sending-weapons-to-taliban-top-u-s-general-confirms/
"Confirms" does not equal "appeared to confirm" or "we continue to get reports."
There are several earlier threads at DU that discuss this prospect.
lies
(315 posts)The US is also willing to negotiate with them, and has been for ages...
cstanleytech
(26,224 posts)can pull out otherwise if they continue to supply weapons the US might decide to do the same to Russia in areas its having or had problems with such as Chechnya.
Blanks
(4,835 posts)In the arctic too.
They've got their moron in office here and they're taking advantage.
bluestarone
(16,853 posts)RUSSIA is killing our troops
Throck
(2,520 posts)DemoTex
(25,390 posts)NewRedDawn
(790 posts)That I believe Russia is giving support to terrorists to attack liberal democratic countries, especially around election times in these countries to give the Far Right kooks running a chance to win or sow chaos.
keithbvadu2
(36,644 posts)But the Russians are such good friends that republicans do not want to investigate their relationships with the Trump gang.
FairWinds
(1,717 posts)and shifted the whole Afghan resistance against the
Russian occupation in the direction of the most radical
Islamist extremists (such as OBL) . . .
you people were fine with it, but now you are outraged.
What we have here is the essence of US exceptionalism
in all its steaming stink.
Think instead about joining Veterans for Peace
That is what I did.
maxsolomon
(33,240 posts)really constructive. tell me how that's not a broad brush?
FairWinds
(1,717 posts)was a horrible mistake that a few of us saw coming and
raised objections. We were ignored.
The double standard hypocrisy of American exceptionalism
is real and very much alive.
Writing that something is a "broad brush" is not very constructive.
It really does not mean anything.
And BTW, I'd wait for the veteran intelligence professionals for sanity
to weigh in on the "Russian arms to the Taliban" issue.
Unlike most of the national security state, the VIPS are truth tellers.
maxsolomon
(33,240 posts)but you "you peopled" DU - an accusation of collective guilt. I'm sick of the hyperbole around here and I'm calling it out. that's what "broad brush" means to me.
I'd estimate 30% of America wasn't even alive when the US government armed the Taliban.
NewRedDawn
(790 posts)And I am not fine with the fucking Russians now either!
vkkv
(3,384 posts)red dog 1
(27,757 posts)Another example of Putin violating international law...and getting away with it!
rolypolychloe
(56 posts)I remember when Obama announced his intention to bring defense spending down to pre WWII levels and I remember thinking, "Wow, I don't see how the defense industry could take that sitting down." The next day, Russia invaded Crimea. It is like Major General Smedley Butler said. All war is a racket. He was the General Prescott Bush (georges granddaddy) and others tried to recruit for a military coup to take over the US. He said this in 1935, but it is just as true today. The billionaires have been trying to take over our country ever since. They came close with George W., but with Trump, they have finally succeeded.
NCDem777
(458 posts)The people had the chance to be rid of the Taliban and the theocrats forever after we got rid of them the first time.
But the Afghanis let the Talis waltz right back in.
I say let them live under Putin's boot for a good decade or so. No refugees. They think the West is the great Satan? Fuck that. I say we let Vlad teach them what a devil really is.
NewRedDawn
(790 posts)dalton99a
(81,391 posts)Russia's Double Game with Islamic Terror
Even as Washington touts its counterterrorism partnerships with Moscow, evidence points to Putin's intelligence service practically helping the Islamic State.
Michael Weiss
08.23.15 1:00 PM ET
NewRedDawn
(790 posts)Look above & earlier in the week on another thread I mused that Putin maybe sending terrorists into countries in Europe to destabilize & get a puppet govt. to his liking.