Poll: Voters resist pre-existing condition opt-out
Source: Politico
By STEVEN SHEPARD 05/03/17 06:20 AM EDT
When it comes to overhauling the Affordable Care Act, there's one thing voters in both parties can agree on: They oppose weakening federal protections for those with pre-existing medical conditions.
A new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll shows resistance to the new measures most controversial provision, with half of all voters opposing allowing states to decide whether to opt-out of requiring health insurance companies to cover Americans with pre-existing conditions. It's a key offering from GOP House leadership to conservatives wary that the partys previous Obamacare replacement didnt go far enough in unwinding the law.
Only 38 percent of voters surveyed support allowing states to opt-out of these protections a figure that underscores the struggle House Republicans and President Donald Trump are having in corralling votes from GOP members who represent districts that lean toward Democrats or are evenly divided.
Despite the sharp partisan divide over the bill with some centrist Republicans joining the entire Democratic conference in opposition there is little difference by party in the poll on state exemptions for pre-existing conditions. More voters in both parties oppose those exemptions than support them. "Fifty-two percent of Democrats and 48 percent of Republicans oppose allowing states to opt-out of requiring insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions," said Kyle Dropp, Morning Consult's co-founder and chief research officer. "In this polarized political climate, this is one issue where Democrats and Republicans largely agree."
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/03/obamacare-repeal-preexisting-conditions-237902
I'm amazed its that low.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)Ligyron
(7,624 posts)Had it backwards.
Haven't had enough caffine yet?
Skittles
(153,142 posts)knightmaar
(748 posts)38% of Americans support saying "Fuck you" to people who are already sick?
That's not a good thing. That position should be limited to the 5-10% asshole libertarian base.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Locrian
(4,522 posts)but are hands down stupid "suckers" for the medical / insurance industry.
What do they think they'll never will get sick? (probably)
They also probably think that the "free market" will miraculously produce cheap health care.
who want to say FU to people already sick, but that think nothing will ever happen to them. I could be the most selfish person ever, and I wouldn't agree to get rid of that.
FakeNoose
(32,626 posts)The opt-out gives insurance companies the wiggle room to avoid insuring certain high-cost members, while taking the premiums from the low-cost members who don't need the insurance anyway.
Once they get the wiggle room, we'll see insurance companies taking more & more profits, while providing less & less healthcare to those who need it. Yes that's pretty much what we've had all along - pre-Obama.
Obama's plan isn't perfect and there are problems that still need to be worked out. But it is light-years better than anything suggested by the GOP so far.
Remember that the insurance industry has made *unconscionable profits* from us for the last 50+ years. It's time for that to end, and if they're screaming about it, that's a good thing!
riversedge
(70,185 posts)women. chip chip chip. Red states on the whole are worse--the same is--has been happening with ACA
FakeNoose
(32,626 posts)ProfessorGAC
(64,990 posts)Substantial majority opposes elimination of the PEC ban, but then 62% of dems and 48% of r's oppose state exemptions. So, there are questions about two very different topics being reported in kind of a slap-dash manner.
Grins
(7,205 posts)If a majority of Americans agree there should be federal protections for those with pre-existing medical conditions, are they also saying that universal health care is a right?
And the reason I ask is a good number of conservatives say "No!" to that question.
The UN says it is. Most European nations say health care for everyone is a right. So does Japan. So does China (Taiwan). It is in the Constitution of Italy. The United States dose not (unless you are in prison, a metaphor just begging to be used). We allow thousands of our fellow citizens to die every year from treatable diseases.
There are many other questions on the how, and the degree, and more, but if we can't answer this question, true universal health care in this country will forever be under attack.
And you say...?