Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,331 posts)
Wed May 24, 2017, 11:30 PM May 2017

Sessions Was Advised Not to Disclose Russia Meetings on Security Forms

Source: New York Times

WASHINGTON — Attorney General Jeff Sessions failed to disclose meetings with Russian officials when he applied for security clearance because he was told not to do so by advisers and the F.B.I., a Justice Department spokesman said Wednesday.

Mr. Sessions met with Sergey I. Kislyak, the Russian ambassador to the United States, at least twice in 2016. But asked on an official government form to note any contact he or family members had with foreign governments or their representatives over the past seven years, Mr. Sessions did not include his encounters with Mr. Kislyak. It is a federal crime to make false statements or withhold relevant information on the background check form.

“As a United States senator, the attorney general met hundreds — if not thousands — of foreign dignitaries and their staff,” Ian Prior, a spokesman for the Justice Department, said in a statement. “The attorney general’s staff consulted with those familiar with the process, as well as the F.B.I. investigator handling the background check, and was instructed not to list meetings with foreign dignitaries and their staff connected with his Senate activities.”

Mr. Sessions filled out two such forms, Mr. Prior said, one last July, as he was first formally vetted by the Trump campaign, and one after the election in November.

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/24/us/politics/jeff-sessions-russia.html



Awkward!
68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sessions Was Advised Not to Disclose Russia Meetings on Security Forms (Original Post) brooklynite May 2017 OP
Could he go to jail please, a private one too. dem4decades May 2017 #1
The FBI told Sessions not to disclose meetings with Russian officials? manicraven May 2017 #2
Huh. furtheradu May 2017 #5
One of his republican underlings Achilleaze May 2017 #23
It shouldn't matter who advised, he knowingly and willingly LIED! ATL Ebony May 2017 #17
Yeah, like on an income tax form, they make it clear that Tanuki May 2017 #21
No and no. former9thward May 2017 #26
Per IRS Tanuki May 2017 #31
I guess you don't read what you post. former9thward May 2017 #37
If you are in collusion with the "advisor" and know damn well you are omitting Tanuki May 2017 #40
No atreides1 May 2017 #34
I know what a SF-86 requires. I have filled them out myself. former9thward May 2017 #38
A lie is a lie and collusion is collusion - PERIOD! ATL Ebony May 2017 #45
An FBI agent is NOT 'the' FBI Maeve May 2017 #33
Write this one up and investigate what happened MiddleClass May 2017 #53
The dog ate my homework. Eyeball_Kid May 2017 #41
Is this being floated as a way to make Sessions be absolved of omission? Or walk him deeper into FailureToCommunicate May 2017 #3
Sessions repeatedly denied it in open hearings, too. Gimme a break, Prior. nt greyl May 2017 #4
Absolutely a certified criminal. ATL Ebony May 2017 #46
Yes but..... Yes but... magicarpet May 2017 #48
I guess they forgot about that. njhoneybadger May 2017 #51
He met them as a campaign surrogate and not as a Senator. That is why Trump chose him for AG. Freethinker65 May 2017 #6
+1, the wording " connected with his Senate activities" is the key here ... Sessions still bold face uponit7771 May 2017 #20
The meetings we know about were on capital hill in his Senate offices. Calista241 May 2017 #24
Why are you sticking up for this man? Why? George II May 2017 #56
Because I think we lose credibility when people claim conspiracy about everything. Calista241 May 2017 #57
Sorry, I disagree. He did not fully disclose his contacts with the Russians (that's a nice way... George II May 2017 #58
I disagree. I think he absolutely would have been confirmed. Calista241 May 2017 #61
I guess I'm not a Sessions, and de facto trump, apologist. George II May 2017 #62
Neither am I. Just a realist. Calista241 May 2017 #63
So who was this mystery FBI person who gave him false info about the forms? pnwmom May 2017 #7
That is what Jeffery Toobin wanted to know LeftInTX May 2017 #12
Pres. Obama did it -- disguised as FBI agent. (Everyone knows NCjack May 2017 #52
The FBI told him to lie on a federal form? pecosbob May 2017 #8
That strains credibility Merlot May 2017 #10
NY field office? I wonder. Qutzupalotl May 2017 #11
+1 uponit7771 May 2017 #18
Doesn't matter. The little twerp lied and it's a felony. Eyeball_Kid May 2017 #42
Yep, those tRumpsters are pretty gullible. elmac May 2017 #13
Exactly. That was the Nuremberg defense, I was only following orders. Session's still_one May 2017 #28
He should have reported the person who told him to lie Dream Girl May 2017 #9
He shouldn't have falsefied the form. He is in violation of federal law still_one May 2017 #30
I'm sorry! Sessions is supposedly the top Attorney in our nation... VigilantG May 2017 #14
Hey, sometimes you get bad advice. Doesn't absolve you of guilt. eggplant May 2017 #15
Anyone associated with Trumpy is awash in lies. Eyeball_Kid May 2017 #43
Ignorance isn't a defense. Especially from a lawyer. OnDoutside May 2017 #16
Especially from the Attorney General C_U_L8R May 2017 #27
Yeah, here's the stinger ".... connected with his Senate activities.... " uponit7771 May 2017 #19
This DeminPennswoods May 2017 #22
The two meetings we know about, both happened in his Senate offices on capital hill. Calista241 May 2017 #25
One meeting happened at the GOP Convention and one in his office. n/t tammywammy May 2017 #35
That's true. Eyeball_Kid May 2017 #44
Were his advisors Jared and Ivanka? The tight cabal livetohike May 2017 #29
Well, if he's such a sap he takes advice that amounts to committing a crime, what the heck Vinca May 2017 #32
i love your logic! KewlKat May 2017 #49
Let's see his emails! MGKrebs May 2017 #36
purposeful errors of ommissions is considered the same as lying, except when conservatives do it beachbum bob May 2017 #39
Per Sessons orders.. Maxheader May 2017 #47
This man knows better. He lied several times! Sunlei May 2017 #50
"thousands of foreign dignitaries". . . . . really? busy boy, eh? niyad May 2017 #54
I don't think Russia should be our adversary, but these guys trying to cover it up... yurbud May 2017 #55
Well, Russia IS. Russian oligarchs would love to destroy Western democracies. Why else do you think WinkyDink May 2017 #60
How do you think they got the oligarchs? Our banks told the collapsing Soviet Union to privatize yurbud May 2017 #66
Russia's military budget is a sixth of ours and their economy is a seventh. yurbud May 2017 #67
Trump is a fuckwit, and if the Russians bought him, they are probably looking for the receipt yurbud May 2017 #68
I don't believe any of this claim. NO FBI guy would have so advised; and NO "Justice Department WinkyDink May 2017 #59
At one time, like in 2016, xxqqqzme May 2017 #64
Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III is a lawyer, he knows very well what the law means bigtime May 2017 #65

manicraven

(901 posts)
2. The FBI told Sessions not to disclose meetings with Russian officials?
Wed May 24, 2017, 11:37 PM
May 2017
Attorney General Jeff Sessions failed to disclose meetings with Russian officials when he applied for security clearance because he was told not to do so by advisers and the F.B.I., a Justice Department spokesman said Wednesday.

furtheradu

(1,865 posts)
5. Huh.
Wed May 24, 2017, 11:48 PM
May 2017

We believe this cuz..? Who~ at FBI~ said this?
hmmmm. I have NO reason to believe sessions.
At all. Ever.
Freakin JERK.
Can't wait till he is sent away to the big house.
JUSTICE, Baby!

Achilleaze

(15,543 posts)
23. One of his republican underlings
Thu May 25, 2017, 06:58 AM
May 2017

Old Man Achilleaze would never accept the "he told me to do it" excuse. That would only piss him off even more.

"I suppose if I told you to go jump in the lake," he would respond, "you'd be dumb enough to do it."

OK, pop.

ATL Ebony

(1,097 posts)
17. It shouldn't matter who advised, he knowingly and willingly LIED!
Thu May 25, 2017, 04:11 AM
May 2017

So he knew he was committing a crime but lied anyway?? LOCK HIM UP

Tanuki

(14,914 posts)
21. Yeah, like on an income tax form, they make it clear that
Thu May 25, 2017, 04:44 AM
May 2017

even if you had help preparing it, your signature attests to it being true and correct. You can't pin the blame on someone else. Jeff Sessions knows better than try to pull a silly "somebody told me to do it this way" defense.

former9thward

(31,935 posts)
26. No and no.
Thu May 25, 2017, 07:14 AM
May 2017

You commit fraud when you knowingly and intentional deceive the IRS. If a professional prepares your return and makes an error you have committed no crime by signing it. You certainly can rely on advice from the FBI when filing out national security forms.

Tanuki

(14,914 posts)
31. Per IRS
Thu May 25, 2017, 07:24 AM
May 2017
https://www.irs.gov/uac/tax-return-preparer-fraud-2
Tax Return Preparer Fraud
FS-2008-10, January 2008
Return preparer fraud generally involves the preparation and filing of false income tax returns by preparers who claim inflated personal or business expenses, false deductions, unallowable credits or excessive exemptions on returns prepared for their clients. Preparers may manipulate income figures to fraudulently obtain tax credits, such as the Earned Income Tax Credit.
"In some situations, the client, or taxpayer, may not have knowledge of the false expenses, deductions, exemptions and/or credits shown on his or her tax return.
However, when the IRS detects the false return, the taxpayer — not the return preparer — must pay the additional taxes and interest and may be subject to penalties.
The IRS Return Preparer Program focuses on enhancing compliance in the return-preparer community by investigating and referring criminal activity by return preparers to the Department of Justice for prosecution and/or asserting appropriate civil penalties against unscrupulous return preparers.
While most preparers provide excellent service to their clients, the IRS urges taxpayers to be very careful when choosing a tax preparer. Taxpayers should be as careful as they would be in choosing a doctor or a lawyer. It is important to know that even if someone else prepares a tax return, it is the taxpayer who is ultimately responsible for all the information on the tax return."


former9thward

(31,935 posts)
37. I guess you don't read what you post.
Thu May 25, 2017, 07:55 AM
May 2017

Of course you are responsible for additional taxes if someone does not fill out your return properly. But it is not a criminal matter. Try again.

Tanuki

(14,914 posts)
40. If you are in collusion with the "advisor" and know damn well you are omitting
Thu May 25, 2017, 08:26 AM
May 2017

critical information, as appears to be the case AG Sessions, it would certainly be a criminal matter. Spare me your unearned condescension next time. It has worn thin.

atreides1

(16,066 posts)
34. No
Thu May 25, 2017, 07:35 AM
May 2017

Standard Form 86 (SF-86), requires full disclosure.


https://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/download/116390


Also, his meetings with Kisylak were done in his position as a Trump campaign adviser, not as a sitting Senator!

former9thward

(31,935 posts)
38. I know what a SF-86 requires. I have filled them out myself.
Thu May 25, 2017, 08:00 AM
May 2017

I also know that you follow the directions of the people who vet the forms. I don't know what the position of Session's was in the meetings. That is a state of mind and only one person knows that. It is impossible for a prosecutor to prove any differently.

ATL Ebony

(1,097 posts)
45. A lie is a lie and collusion is collusion - PERIOD!
Thu May 25, 2017, 09:44 AM
May 2017

He knew he would be committing a crime, so what they agreed for him to lie and commit collusion -- he was still a US Senator with judicial background and absolutely knew better. You can't dress it up in a nice little box with a pretty bow. By asking if he should omit the contacts he was pretty much asking for cover if he lied -- they (whoever else is involved) colluded. LOCK HIM UP.

Maeve

(42,271 posts)
33. An FBI agent is NOT 'the' FBI
Thu May 25, 2017, 07:34 AM
May 2017

WHO told him that? 'Some guy who works over there'??? I don't think so!

MiddleClass

(888 posts)
53. Write this one up and investigate what happened
Thu May 25, 2017, 12:46 PM
May 2017

Place it on the top of the ongoing investigations of the Trump presidency mounting pile.

Day 126, 11 massive scandals, 22 major scandals, 44 big scandals, 49 scandals, (exaggeration for effect)
next, the FBI will be bigger than social security


. I say, investigate, find out exactly what was said by whom, in what capacity, and fire, or suspend accordingly.

Write a public report and let the people know so they can make up their mind on what to do next election

magicarpet

(14,119 posts)
48. Yes but..... Yes but...
Thu May 25, 2017, 10:07 AM
May 2017

..... At the congressional hearings a senator whispered in Session's ear that Russian contacts were exempt from having to be mentioned during his testimony because he was only playing a friendly game of chess with Kislyak and was in no way colluding with the Russians to trash the presidential election and rig it in favor of tr-dump. Jeff is a good boy, a law abiding citizen, and sang in the church choir. End of story.

Freethinker65

(9,999 posts)
6. He met them as a campaign surrogate and not as a Senator. That is why Trump chose him for AG.
Wed May 24, 2017, 11:51 PM
May 2017

Sessions lied to Franken and lied on his clearance documents. Unfortunately, proving it may be difficult to near impossible.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
20. +1, the wording " connected with his Senate activities" is the key here ... Sessions still bold face
Thu May 25, 2017, 04:39 AM
May 2017

... lied

Calista241

(5,585 posts)
24. The meetings we know about were on capital hill in his Senate offices.
Thu May 25, 2017, 07:10 AM
May 2017

With his Senate aides in attendance. If we're going to prove he met them as a campaign surrogate, we're going to have a little proof.

Calista241

(5,585 posts)
57. Because I think we lose credibility when people claim conspiracy about everything.
Fri May 26, 2017, 09:47 PM
May 2017

Is what Sessions did suspicious? Hell yeah. Does it warrant investigation? Yep. Is it enough to jail him, impeach him or force him into early retirement? Not even close.

George II

(67,782 posts)
58. Sorry, I disagree. He did not fully disclose his contacts with the Russians (that's a nice way...
Fri May 26, 2017, 09:54 PM
May 2017

...of putting it, i.e., he LIED about it), which in itself would have been enough to not confirm him as Attorney General. Had he not been confirmed based on false information we would not be discussing this at all.

Calista241

(5,585 posts)
61. I disagree. I think he absolutely would have been confirmed.
Fri May 26, 2017, 10:06 PM
May 2017

He'd have said he met with them in the course of normal Senate business. He'd have reported that he bitched and moaned to Kislyak about the war in Ukraine, and possibly even Iran or Syria. Maybe they even discussed Israel.

Every Republican up there would have reported their own meetings with various ambassadors about whatever various topics. They'd have pointed to twitter messages, public schedules, maybe even some photos from Democrats meeting with different ambassadors. He'd still have gotten 52 votes. Guaranteed.

pnwmom

(108,955 posts)
7. So who was this mystery FBI person who gave him false info about the forms?
Thu May 25, 2017, 12:11 AM
May 2017

Why shouldn't he have listed all his foreign contacts, just like everyone else who fills them out?

Did the same person tell him not to bother mentioning these contacts at his Senate confirmation hearings?

Merlot

(9,696 posts)
10. That strains credibility
Thu May 25, 2017, 12:17 AM
May 2017

We'll need to find this FBI agent who advises lying on back ground check forms.

This sink hole keeps getting bigger.

Qutzupalotl

(14,286 posts)
11. NY field office? I wonder.
Thu May 25, 2017, 12:25 AM
May 2017

That was my first thought when I heard FBI. Someone is compromised there, probably several.

still_one

(92,061 posts)
28. Exactly. That was the Nuremberg defense, I was only following orders. Session's
Thu May 25, 2017, 07:18 AM
May 2017

by lying on that form has committed a crime, and is subject to a fine, and possible imprisonment for up to five years

VigilantG

(374 posts)
14. I'm sorry! Sessions is supposedly the top Attorney in our nation...
Thu May 25, 2017, 12:52 AM
May 2017

He knows what he should have disclosed! I am so tired of this Administration getting cut slack because they're new or not experienced or not politicians!!!

Jeff Sessions gets NO leniency--he should be scrutinized even more--held to THE standard of being an attorney!

DeminPennswoods

(15,265 posts)
22. This
Thu May 25, 2017, 06:27 AM
May 2017

“The attorney general’s staff consulted with those familiar with the process, as well as the F.B.I. investigator handling the background check, and was instructed not to list meetings with foreign dignitaries and their staff connected with his Senate activities.

We know this is a lie. Sessions met with Kislyak in his capacity as a Trump campaign advisor, not as part of his "Senate activities". It's why he had to amend his confirmation hearing testimony since he tried that same "senate activities" line there and it didn't fly.

Calista241

(5,585 posts)
25. The two meetings we know about, both happened in his Senate offices on capital hill.
Thu May 25, 2017, 07:14 AM
May 2017

His Senatorial aides were in attendance. If we are going to say he was acting as a campaign surrogate at the time, we're going to have to present a little proof.

And we're also going to have to ask if other Senators did the same thing, both Repub and Dem.

livetohike

(22,121 posts)
29. Were his advisors Jared and Ivanka? The tight cabal
Thu May 25, 2017, 07:18 AM
May 2017

in the White House will be passing notes to one another in prison.

Vinca

(50,236 posts)
32. Well, if he's such a sap he takes advice that amounts to committing a crime, what the heck
Thu May 25, 2017, 07:24 AM
May 2017

is he doing in his position in the first place??

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
39. purposeful errors of ommissions is considered the same as lying, except when conservatives do it
Thu May 25, 2017, 08:07 AM
May 2017

I guess.

I would have my secret classifications revoked and faced charges if I done anything like this when I was in the military

Maxheader

(4,370 posts)
47. Per Sessons orders..
Thu May 25, 2017, 09:57 AM
May 2017

Using the harshest methods available for both the investigation
and the penalty...
Cuz jeffy would want it that way....

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
55. I don't think Russia should be our adversary, but these guys trying to cover it up...
Thu May 25, 2017, 02:20 PM
May 2017

sure as hell makes it seem something wrong was going on.

If they had contacts with Israel, Britain, or India, I assume they wouldn't hesitate to mention it unless they worked as a foreign lobbyist.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
60. Well, Russia IS. Russian oligarchs would love to destroy Western democracies. Why else do you think
Fri May 26, 2017, 09:58 PM
May 2017

Putin's Puppet threatens NATO leaders and calls modern Germany "evil"?

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
66. How do you think they got the oligarchs? Our banks told the collapsing Soviet Union to privatize
Sat May 27, 2017, 06:00 PM
May 2017

everything or no loans.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
68. Trump is a fuckwit, and if the Russians bought him, they are probably looking for the receipt
Sat May 27, 2017, 06:02 PM
May 2017

to get a refund.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
59. I don't believe any of this claim. NO FBI guy would have so advised; and NO "Justice Department
Fri May 26, 2017, 09:56 PM
May 2017

spokesman" would say anything remotely like this, either.

"...he was told not to do so by (unnamed) advisers and the (vague, non-individual) F.B.I., a(n) unnamed) Justice Department spokesman said Wednesday."

Credible. Not.



xxqqqzme

(14,887 posts)
64. At one time, like in 2016,
Fri May 26, 2017, 10:20 PM
May 2017

an Attorney General was called the top lawman of the country. As such, jeffy beau has now lied TWICE.. Why he was not forced to resign after lying at his confirmation hearing can only be chalked up to IOKIYAR.


Thirty or 40 years ago, in some states, a law school graduate from a state university law school was exempt from taking the bar. That graduate could go straight into practice. I know some southern states and a few western states did this. Wonder if jeffy beau ever had to take a bar exam?

bigtime

(724 posts)
65. Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III is a lawyer, he knows very well what the law means
Fri May 26, 2017, 10:45 PM
May 2017

He must have a lot to hide if he's going to cringe beneath the figleaf of "i got bad advice". Ooh what a liar.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sessions Was Advised Not ...